BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37858High confidence

fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.31% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.135-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-37858 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 42 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-37858
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-14134

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 << l2agsize in dbExtendFS(). When l2agsize exceeds 31 (possible with >2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 << l2agsize in dbExtendFS(). When l2agsize exceeds 31 (possible with >2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/jfs: Prevent integer overflow in AG size calculation The JFS filesystem calculates allocation group (AG) size using 1 << l2agsize in dbExtendFS(). When l2agsize exceeds 31 (possible with >2TB aggregates on 32-bit systems), this 32-bit shift operation causes undefined behavior and improper AG sizing. On 32-bit architectures: - Left-shifting 1 by 32+ bits results in 0 due to integer overflow - This creates invalid AG sizes (0 or garbage values) in sbi->bmap->db_agsize - Subsequent block allocations would reference invalid AG structures - Could lead to: - Filesystem corruption during extend operations - Kernel crashes due to invalid memory accesses - Security vulnerabilities via malformed on-disk structures Fix by casting to s64 before shifting: bmp->db_agsize = (s64)1 << l2agsize; This ensures 64-bit arithmetic even on 32-bit architectures. The cast matches the data type of db_agsize (s64) and follows similar patterns in JFS block calculation code. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0670Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0650Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37842 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019217Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.237 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.181 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.135 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.3 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:16 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-14134
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37858 · cve.blacktree.nl