BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37786High confidence

net: dsa: free routing table on probe failure

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13037

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: free routing table on probe failure If complete = true in dsa_tree_setup(), it means that we are the last switch of the tree which is successfully probing, and we should be setting up all switches from our probe path. After "complete" becomes true, dsa_tree_setup_cpu_ports() or any subsequent function may fail. If that happens, the entire tree setup is in limbo: the first N-1 switches have successfully finished probing (doing nothing but having allocated persistent memory in the tree's dst->ports, and maybe dst->rtable), and switch N failed to probe, ending the tree setup process before anything is tangible from the user's PoV. If switch N fails to probe, its memory (ports) will be freed and removed from dst->ports. However, the dst->rtable elements pointing to its ports, as created by dsa_link_touch(), will remain there, and will lead to use-after-free if dereferenced. If dsa_tree_setup_switches() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, which is entirely possible because that is where ds->ops->setup() is, we get a kasan report like this: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 Read of size 8 at addr ffff000004f56020 by task kworker/u8:3/42 Call trace: __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x20/0x30 mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 mv88e6xxx_setup+0xebc/0x1eb0 dsa_register_switch+0x1af4/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Allocated by task 42: __kasan_kmalloc+0x84/0xa0 __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x298/0x490 dsa_switch_touch_ports+0x174/0x3d8 dsa_register_switch+0x800/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Freed by task 42: __kasan_slab_free+0x48/0x68 kfree+0x138/0x418 dsa_register_switch+0x2694/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 The simplest way to fix the bug is to delete the routing table in its entirety. dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() has no problem in regenerating it even if we deleted links between ports other than those of switch N, because dsa_link_touch() first checks whether the port pair already exists in dst->rtable, allocating if not. The deletion of the routing table in its entirety already exists in dsa_tree_teardown(), so refactor that into a function that can also be called from the tree setup error path. In my analysis of the commit to blame, it is the one which added dsa_link elements to dst->rtable. Prior to that, each switch had its own ds->rtable which is freed when the switch fails to probe. But the tree is potentially persistent memory.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: free routing table on probe failure If complete = true in dsa_tree_setup(), it means that we are the last switch of the tree which is successfully probing, and we should be setting up all switches from our probe path. After "complete" becomes true, dsa_tree_setup_cpu_ports() or any subsequent function may fail. If that happens, the entire tree setup is in limbo: the first N-1 switches have successfully finished probing (doing nothing but having allocated persistent memory in the tree's dst->ports, and maybe dst->rtable), and switch N failed to probe, ending the tree setup process before anything is tangible from the user's PoV. If switch N fails to probe, its memory (ports) will be freed and removed from dst->ports. However, the dst->rtable elements pointing to its ports, as created by dsa_link_touch(), will remain there, and will lead to use-after-free if dereferenced. If dsa_tree_setup_switches() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, which is entirely possible because that is where ds->ops->setup() is, we get a kasan report like this: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 Read of size 8 at addr ffff000004f56020 by task kworker/u8:3/42 Call trace: __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x20/0x30 mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 mv88e6xxx_setup+0xebc/0x1eb0 dsa_register_switch+0x1af4/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Allocated by task 42: __kasan_kmalloc+0x84/0xa0 __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x298/0x490 dsa_switch_touch_ports+0x174/0x3d8 dsa_register_switch+0x800/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Freed by task 42: __kasan_slab_free+0x48/0x68 kfree+0x138/0x418 dsa_register_switch+0x2694/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 The simplest way to fix the bug is to delete the routing table in its entirety. dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() has no problem in regenerating it even if we deleted links between ports other than those of switch N, because dsa_link_touch() first checks whether the port pair already exists in dst->rtable, allocating if not. The deletion of the routing table in its entirety already exists in dsa_tree_teardown(), so refactor that into a function that can also be called from the tree setup error path. In my analysis of the commit to blame, it is the one which added dsa_link elements to dst->rtable. Prior to that, each switch had its own ds->rtable which is freed when the switch fails to probe. But the tree is potentially persistent memory.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: free routing table on probe failure If complete = true in dsa_tree_setup(), it means that we are the last switch of the tree which is successfully probing, and we should be setting up all switches from our probe path. After "complete" becomes true, dsa_tree_setup_cpu_ports() or any subsequent function may fail. If that happens, the entire tree setup is in limbo: the first N-1 switches have successfully finished probing (doing nothing but having allocated persistent memory in the tree's dst->ports, and maybe dst->rtable), and switch N failed to probe, ending the tree setup process before anything is tangible from the user's PoV. If switch N fails to probe, its memory (ports) will be freed and removed from dst->ports. However, the dst->rtable elements pointing to its ports, as created by dsa_link_touch(), will remain there, and will lead to use-after-free if dereferenced. If dsa_tree_setup_switches() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, which is entirely possible because that is where ds->ops->setup() is, we get a kasan report like this: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 Read of size 8 at addr ffff000004f56020 by task kworker/u8:3/42 Call trace: __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x20/0x30 mv88e6xxx_setup_upstream_port+0x240/0x568 mv88e6xxx_setup+0xebc/0x1eb0 dsa_register_switch+0x1af4/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Allocated by task 42: __kasan_kmalloc+0x84/0xa0 __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x298/0x490 dsa_switch_touch_ports+0x174/0x3d8 dsa_register_switch+0x800/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 Freed by task 42: __kasan_slab_free+0x48/0x68 kfree+0x138/0x418 dsa_register_switch+0x2694/0x2ae0 mv88e6xxx_register_switch+0x1b8/0x2a8 mv88e6xxx_probe+0xc4c/0xf60 mdio_probe+0x78/0xb8 really_probe+0x2b8/0x5a8 __driver_probe_device+0x164/0x298 driver_probe_device+0x78/0x258 __device_attach_driver+0x274/0x350 The simplest way to fix the bug is to delete the routing table in its entirety. dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() has no problem in regenerating it even if we deleted links between ports other than those of switch N, because dsa_link_touch() first checks whether the port pair already exists in dst->rtable, allocating if not. The deletion of the routing table in its entirety already exists in dsa_tree_teardown(), so refactor that into a function that can also be called from the tree setup error path. In my analysis of the commit to blame, it is the one which added dsa_link elements to dst->rtable. Prior to that, each switch had its own ds->rtable which is freed when the switch fails to probe. But the tree is potentially persistent memory.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56657 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56719 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0328Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

n.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/03/msg00002.html Bulletin de sécurité Debian LTS DLA-4499-1 du 13 mars 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/03/msg00003.html Référence CVE CVE-2022-50516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50516 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0291Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

on Bulletin de sécurité Debian DSA-6162-1 du 12 mars 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00072.html Bulletin de sécurité Debian DSA-6163-1 du 12 mars 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00071.html Référence CVE CVE-2023-53424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26822 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < 51df5513cca6349d0bea01bab95cd96cf869976e; c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < 6c20894d21600ca1e8549086dfbb986e277bf8a6; c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < fb12b460ec46c9efad98de6d9ba349691db51dc7; c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < 5c8066fbdb9653c6e9a224bdcd8f9c91a484f0de; c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < a038f5f15af455dfe35bc68549e02b950978700a; c5f51765a1f60b701840544faf3ca63204b8dc3c < 8bf108d7161ffc6880ad13a0cc109de3cf631727; 5.5
Fixed
< 5.5; 5.15.201 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.164 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.25 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.14.4 ≤ 6.14.*; 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:15 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13037
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37786 · cve.blacktree.nl