BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37785High confidence

ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.135-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2025-37785 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 64 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-37785
265 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11831

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11831Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed). ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block. If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access. Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero). Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read. This issue was found by syzkaller tool. Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1118Dell PowerProtect Data Domain OS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain OS ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen – sogar mit Root-Rechten –, um erweiterte Rechte zu erlangen – einschließlich Administratorrechte –, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, um Daten zu manipulieren, um vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder um andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0861Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand oder nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1031Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40300 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1008Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0949Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36357 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0892Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0622Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2025-31650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32441 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37932 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 juillet 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0510Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Gestion détaillée du document le 06 juin 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0480Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un déni de service et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Gestion détaillée du document le 30 mai 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Gestion détaillée du document le 23 mai 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0368Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38575 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39735 Gestion détaillée du document le 02 mai 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À p

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-004174Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.19, 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.236 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.134 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Apr 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11831
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 14da7dbecb430e35b5889da8dae7bef33173b351; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < e47f472a664d70a3d104a6c2a035cdff55a719b4; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < b7531a4f99c3887439d778afaf418d1a01a5f01b; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 89503e5eae64637d0fa2218912b54660effe7d93; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 52a5509ab19a5d3afe301165d9b5787bba34d842; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < b47584c556444cf7acb66b26a62cbc348eb92b78; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < ac28c5684c1cdab650a7e5065b19e91577d37a4b; ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 53bc45da8d8da92ec07877f5922b130562eb4b00 · Fixed: < 2.6.19; 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.236 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.134 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*
    After
    Linux: ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 14da7dbecb430e35b5889da8dae7bef33173b351, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < e47f472a664d70a3d104a6c2a035cdff55a719b4, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < b7531a4f99c3887439d778afaf418d1a01a5f01b, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 89503e5eae64637d0fa2218912b54660effe7d93, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 52a5509ab19a5d3afe301165d9b5787bba34d842, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < b47584c556444cf7acb66b26a62cbc348eb92b78, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < ac28c5684c1cdab650a7e5065b19e91577d37a4b, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < 53bc45da8d8da92ec07877f5922b130562eb4b00, ac27a0ec112a089f1a5102bc8dffc79c8c815571 < d5e206778e96e8667d3bde695ad372c296dc9353, 2.6.19 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.19, 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.236 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.134 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37785 · cve.blacktree.nl