BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37772High confidence

RDMA/cma: Fix workqueue crash in cma_netevent_work_handler

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13034

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Fix workqueue crash in cma_netevent_work_handler struct rdma_cm_id has member "struct work_struct net_work" that is reused for enqueuing cma_netevent_work_handler()s onto cma_wq. Below crash[1] can occur if more than one call to cma_netevent_callback() occurs in quick succession, which further enqueues cma_netevent_work_handler()s for the same rdma_cm_id, overwriting any previously queued work-item(s) that was just scheduled to run i.e. there is no guarantee the queued work item may run between two successive calls to cma_netevent_callback() and the 2nd INIT_WORK would overwrite the 1st work item (for the same rdma_cm_id), despite grabbing id_table_lock during enqueue. Also drgn analysis [2] indicates the work item was likely overwritten. Fix this by moving the INIT_WORK() to __rdma_create_id(), so that it doesn't race with any existing queue_work() or its worker thread. [1] Trimmed crash stack: ============================================= BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 kworker/u256:6 ... 6.12.0-0... Workqueue: cma_netevent_work_handler [rdma_cm] (rdma_cm) RIP: 0010:process_one_work+0xba/0x31a Call Trace: worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============================================= [2] drgn crash analysis: >>> trace = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace() >>> trace (0) crash_setup_regs (./arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h:111:15) (1) __crash_kexec (kernel/crash_core.c:122:4) (2) panic (kernel/panic.c:399:3) (3) oops_end (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:382:3) ... (8) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3168:2) (9) process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:3310:3) (10) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3391:4) (11) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389:9) Line workqueue.c:3168 for this kernel version is in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); >>> trace[8]["work"] *(struct work_struct *)0xffff92577d0a21d8 = { .data = (atomic_long_t){ .counter = (s64)536870912, <=== Note }, .entry = (struct list_head){ .next = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, .prev = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, }, .func = (work_func_t)cma_netevent_work_handler+0x0 = 0xffffffffc2cec280, } Suspicion is that pwq is NULL: >>> trace[8]["pwq"] (struct pool_workqueue *)<absent> In process_one_work(), pwq is assigned from: struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work); and get_work_pwq() is: static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) { unsigned long data = atomic_long_read(&work->data); if (data & WORK_STRUCT_PWQ) return work_struct_pwq(data); else return NULL; } WORK_STRUCT_PWQ is 0x4: >>> print(repr(prog['WORK_STRUCT_PWQ'])) Object(prog, 'enum work_flags', value=4) But work->data is 536870912 which is 0x20000000. So, get_work_pwq() returns NULL and we crash in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); =============================================

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Fix workqueue crash in cma_netevent_work_handler struct rdma_cm_id has member "struct work_struct net_work" that is reused for enqueuing cma_netevent_work_handler()s onto cma_wq. Below crash[1] can occur if more than one call to cma_netevent_callback() occurs in quick succession, which further enqueues cma_netevent_work_handler()s for the same rdma_cm_id, overwriting any previously queued work-item(s) that was just scheduled to run i.e. there is no guarantee the queued work item may run between two successive calls to cma_netevent_callback() and the 2nd INIT_WORK would overwrite the 1st work item (for the same rdma_cm_id), despite grabbing id_table_lock during enqueue. Also drgn analysis [2] indicates the work item was likely overwritten. Fix this by moving the INIT_WORK() to __rdma_create_id(), so that it doesn't race with any existing queue_work() or its worker thread. [1] Trimmed crash stack: ============================================= BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 kworker/u256:6 ... 6.12.0-0... Workqueue: cma_netevent_work_handler [rdma_cm] (rdma_cm) RIP: 0010:process_one_work+0xba/0x31a Call Trace: worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============================================= [2] drgn crash analysis: >>> trace = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace() >>> trace (0) crash_setup_regs (./arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h:111:15) (1) __crash_kexec (kernel/crash_core.c:122:4) (2) panic (kernel/panic.c:399:3) (3) oops_end (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:382:3) ... (8) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3168:2) (9) process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:3310:3) (10) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3391:4) (11) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389:9) Line workqueue.c:3168 for this kernel version is in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); >>> trace[8]["work"] *(struct work_struct *)0xffff92577d0a21d8 = { .data = (atomic_long_t){ .counter = (s64)536870912, <=== Note }, .entry = (struct list_head){ .next = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, .prev = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, }, .func = (work_func_t)cma_netevent_work_handler+0x0 = 0xffffffffc2cec280, } Suspicion is that pwq is NULL: >>> trace[8]["pwq"] (struct pool_workqueue *)<absent> In process_one_work(), pwq is assigned from: struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work); and get_work_pwq() is: static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) { unsigned long data = atomic_long_read(&work->data); if (data & WORK_STRUCT_PWQ) return work_struct_pwq(data); else return NULL; } WORK_STRUCT_PWQ is 0x4: >>> print(repr(prog['WORK_STRUCT_PWQ'])) Object(prog, 'enum work_flags', value=4) But work->data is 536870912 which is 0x20000000. So, get_work_pwq() returns NULL and we crash in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); =============================================

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Fix workqueue crash in cma_netevent_work_handler struct rdma_cm_id has member "struct work_struct net_work" that is reused for enqueuing cma_netevent_work_handler()s onto cma_wq. Below crash[1] can occur if more than one call to cma_netevent_callback() occurs in quick succession, which further enqueues cma_netevent_work_handler()s for the same rdma_cm_id, overwriting any previously queued work-item(s) that was just scheduled to run i.e. there is no guarantee the queued work item may run between two successive calls to cma_netevent_callback() and the 2nd INIT_WORK would overwrite the 1st work item (for the same rdma_cm_id), despite grabbing id_table_lock during enqueue. Also drgn analysis [2] indicates the work item was likely overwritten. Fix this by moving the INIT_WORK() to __rdma_create_id(), so that it doesn't race with any existing queue_work() or its worker thread. [1] Trimmed crash stack: ============================================= BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 kworker/u256:6 ... 6.12.0-0... Workqueue: cma_netevent_work_handler [rdma_cm] (rdma_cm) RIP: 0010:process_one_work+0xba/0x31a Call Trace: worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============================================= [2] drgn crash analysis: >>> trace = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace() >>> trace (0) crash_setup_regs (./arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h:111:15) (1) __crash_kexec (kernel/crash_core.c:122:4) (2) panic (kernel/panic.c:399:3) (3) oops_end (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:382:3) ... (8) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3168:2) (9) process_scheduled_works (kernel/workqueue.c:3310:3) (10) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3391:4) (11) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389:9) Line workqueue.c:3168 for this kernel version is in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); >>> trace[8]["work"] *(struct work_struct *)0xffff92577d0a21d8 = { .data = (atomic_long_t){ .counter = (s64)536870912, <=== Note }, .entry = (struct list_head){ .next = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, .prev = (struct list_head *)0xffff924d075924c0, }, .func = (work_func_t)cma_netevent_work_handler+0x0 = 0xffffffffc2cec280, } Suspicion is that pwq is NULL: >>> trace[8]["pwq"] (struct pool_workqueue *)<absent> In process_one_work(), pwq is assigned from: struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work); and get_work_pwq() is: static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) { unsigned long data = atomic_long_read(&work->data); if (data & WORK_STRUCT_PWQ) return work_struct_pwq(data); else return NULL; } WORK_STRUCT_PWQ is 0x4: >>> print(repr(prog['WORK_STRUCT_PWQ'])) Object(prog, 'enum work_flags', value=4) But work->data is 536870912 which is 0x20000000. So, get_work_pwq() returns NULL and we crash in process_one_work(): 3168 strscpy(worker->desc, pwq->wq->name, WORKER_DESC_LEN); =============================================

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-37763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37779 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
925d046e7e52c71c3531199ce137e141807ef740 < 51003b2c872c63d28bcf5fbcc52cf7b05615f7b7; 925d046e7e52c71c3531199ce137e141807ef740 < c2b169fc7a12665d8a675c1ff14bca1b9c63fb9a; 925d046e7e52c71c3531199ce137e141807ef740 < d23fd7a539ac078df119707110686a5b226ee3bb; 925d046e7e52c71c3531199ce137e141807ef740 < b172a4a0de254f1fcce7591833a9a63547c2f447; 925d046e7e52c71c3531199ce137e141807ef740 < 45f5dcdd049719fb999393b30679605f16ebce14; 6.0
Fixed
< 6.0; 6.1.135 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.25 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.14.4 ≤ 6.14.*; 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:14 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13034
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37772 · cve.blacktree.nl