BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37743High confidence

wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 22 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.16.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-37743 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 49 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-37743
58 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from the monitor destination ring and assigned to the ppdu_info structure to update per-packet statistics. In standalone monitor mode, along with per-packet statistics, the packet data (payload) is captured, and the driver updates per MSDU to mac80211. When the AP interface is enabled, only extended statistics mode is activated. As part of enabling monitor rings for collecting statistics, the driver subscribes to HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV in the filter configuration. This TLV is received from the monitor destination ring, and kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object occurs, which is not freed, leading to a memory leak. The kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object is only required while enabling the standalone monitor interface. This causes a memory leak while enabling extended statistics mode in the driver. Fix this memory leak by removing the kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object in the HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV handling. Additionally, remove the standalone monitor mode handlings in the HAL_MON_BUF_ADDR and HAL_RX_MSDU_END TLVs. These TLV tags will be handled properly when enabling standalone monitor mode in the future. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13069

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 22 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from the monitor destination ring and assigned to the ppdu_info structure to update per-packet statistics. In standalone monitor mode, along with per-packet statistics, the packet data (payload) is captured, and the driver updates per MSDU to mac80211. When the AP interface is enabled, only extended statistics mode is activated. As part of enabling monitor rings for collecting statistics, the driver subscribes to HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV in the filter configuration. This TLV is received from the monitor destination ring, and kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object occurs, which is not freed, leading to a memory leak. The kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object is only required while enabling the standalone monitor interface. This causes a memory leak while enabling extended statistics mode in the driver. Fix this memory leak by removing the kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object in the HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV handling. Additionally, remove the standalone monitor mode handlings in the HAL_MON_BUF_ADDR and HAL_RX_MSDU_END TLVs. These TLV tags will be handled properly when enabling standalone monitor mode in the future. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from the monitor destination ring and assigned to the ppdu_info structure to update per-packet statistics. In standalone monitor mode, along with per-packet statistics, the packet data (payload) is captured, and the driver updates per MSDU to mac80211. When the AP interface is enabled, only extended statistics mode is activated. As part of enabling monitor rings for collecting statistics, the driver subscribes to HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV in the filter configuration. This TLV is received from the monitor destination ring, and kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object occurs, which is not freed, leading to a memory leak. The kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object is only required while enabling the standalone monitor interface. This causes a memory leak while enabling extended statistics mode in the driver. Fix this memory leak by removing the kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object in the HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV handling. Additionally, remove the standalone monitor mode handlings in the HAL_MON_BUF_ADDR and HAL_RX_MSDU_END TLVs. These TLV tags will be handled properly when enabling standalone monitor mode in the future. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: ath12k: Avoid memory leak while enabling statistics Driver uses monitor destination rings for extended statistics mode and standalone monitor mode. In extended statistics mode, TLVs are parsed from the buffer received from the monitor destination ring and assigned to the ppdu_info structure to update per-packet statistics. In standalone monitor mode, along with per-packet statistics, the packet data (payload) is captured, and the driver updates per MSDU to mac80211. When the AP interface is enabled, only extended statistics mode is activated. As part of enabling monitor rings for collecting statistics, the driver subscribes to HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV in the filter configuration. This TLV is received from the monitor destination ring, and kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object occurs, which is not freed, leading to a memory leak. The kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object is only required while enabling the standalone monitor interface. This causes a memory leak while enabling extended statistics mode in the driver. Fix this memory leak by removing the kzalloc for the mon_mpdu object in the HAL_RX_MPDU_START TLV handling. Additionally, remove the standalone monitor mode handlings in the HAL_MON_BUF_ADDR and HAL_RX_MSDU_END TLVs. These TLV tags will be handled properly when enabling standalone monitor mode in the future. Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00173-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-36365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-36365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37761 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37761 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020963Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.3, 6.14.3 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:14 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13069
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37743 · cve.blacktree.nl