BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-37741High confidence

jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13074

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1] When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4, which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the mounted loop device to be invalidated. When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(), read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately causes a deadlock when entering diFree(). To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode. [1] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 but task is already holding lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309: #0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline] #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026 #2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline] validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline] duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022 diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/en ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1] When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4, which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the mounted loop device to be invalidated. When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(), read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately causes a deadlock when entering diFree(). To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode. [1] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 but task is already holding lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309: #0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline] #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026 #2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline] validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline] duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022 diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/en ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: Prevent copying of nlink with value 0 from disk inode syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1] When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4, which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the mounted loop device to be invalidated. When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(), read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately causes a deadlock when entering diFree(). To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode. [1] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 but task is already holding lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309: #0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline] #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026 #2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline] validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline] duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022 diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/en ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2025-32414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3608 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3620 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0670Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0650Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 5b2f26d3fba4e9aac314f8bc0963b3fc28c0e456; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 8b5ce75f8bd3ddf480cc0a240d7ff5cdea0444f9; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 86bfeaa18f9e4615b97f2d613e0fcc4ced196527; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < c9541c2bd0edbdbc5c1148a84d3b48dc8d1b8af2; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b3c4884b987e5d8d0ec061a4d52653c4f4b9c37e; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < aeb926e605f97857504bdf748f575e40617e2ef9; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 994787341358816d91b2fded288ecb7f129f2b27; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < a2b560815528ae8e266fca6038bb5585d13aaef4
Fixed
< 2.6.12; 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.237 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.181 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.135 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13074
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-37741 · cve.blacktree.nl