BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-33092High confidence

IBM Db2 for Linux code execution

IBM · Db2

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 26 Feb 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs IBM Db2 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-23026

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

IBM Db2 for Linux 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.1.2 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow in db2fm, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

What

IBM Db2 for Linux 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.1.2 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow in db2fm, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

Why

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

IBM Db2 for Linux 12.1.0, 12.1.1, and 12.1.2 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow in db2fm, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system.

Why

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Stack-based Buffer Overflow → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-121 ↗

CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
Remote code executionCWE-121
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1675IBM DB2: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, und um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250730Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Jul 2025 [827KB], published on 30 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0131Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-27899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27900 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27901 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27903 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27904 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30761 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0083Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1493 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7783 Gestion détaillée du document le 23 janvier 2026 Version initial

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0760Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-27152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29927 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32386 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32421 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32421 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3445 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36047 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0651Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2024-45492 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49342 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27607 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47278 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47278 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889 Gestion détaillée du document le 01 août 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À pr

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-010842IBM の Linux 用 IBM DB2 におけるスタックベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

IBM の Linux 用 IBM DB2 には、スタックベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Db2: 11.5.0 ≤ 11.5.9, 12.1.0 ≤ 12.1.2
Fixed
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Jul 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 17:50 UTC · CWE-121 · Stack-based Buffer Overflow

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-23026
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-33092 · cve.blacktree.nl