BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-30177High confidence

Apache Camel: Camel-Undertow Message Header Injection via Improper Filtering

Apache Software Foundation · Apache Camel

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
mavenorg.apache.camel:camel-undertow>= 4.10.0, < 4.10.34.10.3GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 1 Apr 2025
mavenorg.apache.camel:camel-undertow>= 4.8.0, < 4.8.64.8.6GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 1 Apr 2025
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-9314

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel in Camel-Undertow component under particular conditions. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.3, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.3 for 4.10.x LTS and 4.8.6 for 4.8.x LTS. Camel undertow component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, in particular the custom header filter strategy used by the component only filter the "out" direction, while it doesn't filter the "in" direction. This allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviour such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component.

What

Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel in Camel-Undertow component under particular conditions. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.3, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.3 for 4.10.x LTS and 4.8.6 for 4.8.x LTS. Camel undertow component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, in particular the custom header filter strategy used by the component only filter the "out" direction, while it doesn't filter the "in" direction. This allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviour such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component.

Why

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes internal special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Bypass/Injection vulnerability in Apache Camel in Camel-Undertow component under particular conditions. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.10.0 before 4.10.3, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.6. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.10.3 for 4.10.x LTS and 4.8.6 for 4.8.x LTS. Camel undertow component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, in particular the custom header filter strategy used by the component only filter the "out" direction, while it doesn't filter the "in" direction. This allows an attacker to include Camel specific headers that for some Camel components can alter the behaviour such as the camel-bean component, or the camel-exec component.

Why

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes internal special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Internal Special Elements → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-164 ↗

CWE-164: Improper Neutralization of Internal Special Elements. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes internal special elements that could be interpreted in unexpected ways when they are sent to a downstream component.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-164
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0678Apache Camel: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Manipulation von Dateien

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Apache Camel ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250402Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB], published on 2 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-030712Apache Software FoundationのApache Camelにおける入力確認に関する脆弱性

Apache Camel Undertowコンポーネントにおける不適切な入力検証の脆弱性について説明します。この問題は、Apache Camelのバージョン4.11.0から4.14.9未満、4.15.0から4.18.4未満、4.19.0から4.22.0未満に影響を及ぼします。UndertowEndpointはheaderFilterStrategyフィールドをデフォルトでベースのHttpHeaderFilterStrategyに設定し、そのインスタンスを遅延生成されるUndertowHttpBindingに渡していました。これにより、DefaultUndertowHttpBindingのコンストラクタで設定されるUndertowHeaderFilterStrategyが上書きされていました。カスタムバインディングや明示的なheaderFilterStrategyが提供されていない限り、エンドポイントに設定されたルート上でundertow固有のフィルタリングは実行されていませんでした。戦略オブジェクトは生成されるもののすぐに置き換えられ、参照されることがありませんでした。その結果、レガシーwebsocket.<Exchange>-ヘッダープレフィックスはundertowトランスポート境界で双方向にフィルタリングされず、undertowのHTTPコンシューマーはその形式のインバウンドワイヤーヘッダーをExchangeにマッピングしていました。UndertowのWebSocketプロデューサーはそれらをディスパッチ指示として読み取り、ルートが選択したピアとは異なるピアへ配信される可能性がありました。また、undertow自身が受け入れないヘッダー名もスキップされずにExchangeにマッピングされていました。Rest DSLコンシューマーには影響がありませんでした。なぜなら、UndertowComponentは明示的にUndertowRestHeaderFilterStrategyを割り当てており、これはundertow戦略を拡張しているためです。本件はCVE-2025-30177のリグレッションではありません。ベースのHttpHeaderFilterStrategyはインバウンドのCamelプレフィックスフィルターを自身で構成しているため、該当勧告による保護は基本クラスを通じて引き続き機能していました。今回の変更で起きたのは、undertow戦略がエンドポイントパス上で孤立し、その結果undertowが拒否するヘッダー名をスキップする機能やレガシーwebsocket.プレフィックスを双方向でフィルタリングする機能という2つの修正が、エンドポイントが使用しないクラスに適用され、リリースしたバージョンでは効果を持たなかったということです。ユーザーには、本問題を修正したバージョン4.22.0へのアップグレードを推奨します。4.14.xのLTSリリース系列を利用している場合は4.14.9へ、4.18.xリリース系列の場合は4.18.4へのアップグレードを推奨します。すぐにアップグレードできない展開環境では、デフォルトに頼らず戦略を明示的に設定してください。例えば、UndertowHeaderFilterStrategyをレジストリにバインドし、エンドポイントを「undertow:http://0.0.0.0:8080/foo?headerFilterStrategy=#myStrategy」のように設定します。加えて、信頼境界でremoveHeaders("websocket.*")を使いディスパッチヘッダーを除去してください。なお、アップグレードしても残る制限があります。undertowコンポーネントはwebsocket.値を外部に公開されるAPI契約の一部として意図的に保持しており、UndertowProducerはこれらをin.getHeaderで読み取るため、HeaderFilterStrategyを参照しません。したがって、復旧したフィルタリングはundertowトランスポート境界での多層防御として機能します。非undertowコンシューマーからの信頼できないメッセージをundertowプロデューサーに渡すルートは本修正の保護対象外であり、当該ルート側でそれらのヘッダーを自ら除去する必要があります。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-030748Apache Software FoundationのApache Camelにおける複数の脆弱性

Apache Camel Knativeコンポーネントにおける不適切な入力検証および下流コンポーネントで使用される出力中の特殊要素の不適切な無害化("インジェクション")の脆弱性について説明します。camel-knativeのKnativeコンシューマは、受信したCloudEvent属性をCamelメッセージヘッダーにマッピングします。バイナリコンテンツモードでは、HTTPヘッダーのパスがKnativeHttpHeaderFilterStrategyを通じてCamel内部ヘッダーをフィルタリングしますが、構造化コンテンツモード(Content-Type: application/cloudevents+json)では、CloudEventの拡張フィールドがJSONボディから直接読み取られ、すべての拡張キーがHeaderFilterStrategyを適用せずにExchangeヘッダーにコピーされます(CloudEventProcessors、仕様バージョン1.0、1.0.1、1.0.2)。その結果、認証されていない攻撃者が構造化モードのCloudEventリクエストを介してCamel内部ヘッダー(例:CamelHttpUri、CamelHttpPath、CamelFileName)をインジェクトでき、Camelのヘッダーマップに対して大文字小文字を区別せずにマッチさせることが可能です。ルートがKnativeコンシューマからヘッダ駆動のコンポーネント(camel-httpやcamel-fileなど)にメッセージを転送する場合、インジェクトされたヘッダーが設定済みの値を上書きし、ルートに応じてサーバー側リクエストフォージェリ(SSRF)、パストラバーサル、またはメッセージディスパッチのリダイレクトを引き起こす可能性があります。これは、バイナリコンテンツモードパスに以前追加されたインバウンドヘッダーフィルタリングの不完全な修正に起因しており、camel-cxf/camel-knative(CVE-2026-47323)、camel-undertow(CVE-2025-30177)、より広範なincoming-header filter(CVE-2025-27636およびCVE-2025-29891)、非HTTPストラテジー(CVE-2026-40453)で対処されたパターンと類似しています。この問題はApache Camelの以下のバージョンに影響を及ぼします:3.15.0から4.14.9未満、4.15.0から4.18.4未満、4.19.0から4.21.0未満です。利用者には問題が修正されたバージョン4.22.0へのアップグレードを推奨します。4.18.xのLTSリリースを利用している場合は4.18.4へのアップグレード、4.14.xのLTSリリースを利用している場合は4.14.9へのアップグレードが推奨されます。非LTSリリースの4.15.0から4.17.0および4.19.0から4.21.0は影響を受けますがメンテナンス修正が提供されないため、これらのバージョンを使用している場合は4.18.4または4.22.0へのアップグレードが推奨されます。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-003493Apache Software Foundation の Apache Camel における内部特殊要素の不適切な無害化の脆弱性

Apache Software Foundation の Apache Camel には、内部特殊要素の不適切な無害化の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Apache Camel: 4.10.0 < 4.10.3, 4.8.0 < 4.8.6
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Apr 2025 · Last source change 1 Apr 2025, 18:42 UTC · CWE-164 · Improper Neutralization of Internal Special Elements

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-9314
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-30177 · cve.blacktree.nl