BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-29088High confidence

In SQLite 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, certain argument values to sqlite3_db_config (in the C-language API) can cause a denial of service (application crash)

SQLite · SQLite

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.6MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs SQLite SQLite and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainsqliteVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.48.0-r4Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.46.1-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcesqlite3Affected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.46.1-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcesqlite3Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.46.1-4Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivesqlite3Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.3.45.1-1ubuntu2.3Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2025-29088 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitysqlite: Denial of Service in SQLite
12 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • lemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • sqlite as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • sqlite-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • sqlite-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • sqlite-tcl as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • sqlite.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • lemon as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • sqlite as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • sqlite-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • sqlite-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • sqlite-tcl as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • sqlite.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A flaw was found in SQLite. This vulnerability allows an application-level denial of service via improper configuration of the lookaside memory allocator, which could lead to resource exhaustion or application crashes.
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A vulnerability in sqlite allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the SQLITE_DBCONFIG_LOOKASIDE component.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
SSA-994087 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-994087: Multiple SQLite Vulnerabilities in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW Station Access Controller Before V5.7
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW Station Access Controller (SAC)
Summary
A vulnerability in sqlite allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the SQLITE_DBCONFIG_LOOKASIDE component.
Remediation
Update to V5.7 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-10698

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In SQLite 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, certain argument values to sqlite3_db_config (in the C-language API) can cause a denial of service (application crash). An sz*nBig multiplication is not cast to a 64-bit integer, and consequently some memory allocations may be incorrect.

What

In SQLite 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, certain argument values to sqlite3_db_config (in the C-language API) can cause a denial of service (application crash). An sz*nBig multiplication is not cast to a 64-bit integer, and consequently some memory allocations may be incorrect.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In SQLite 3.49.0 before 3.49.1, certain argument values to sqlite3_db_config (in the C-language API) can cause a denial of service (application crash). An sz*nBig multiplication is not cast to a 64-bit integer, and consequently some memory allocations may be incorrect.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-190
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1595IBM AIX und VIOS (SQLite): Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM AIX und IBM VIOS ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder um Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2735Dell integrated Dell Remote Access Controller: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell integrated Dell Remote Access Controller ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250417Security Bulletin 17 April 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 April 2025, published on 17 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0592Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Network Monitor

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Tenable Network Monitor. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24357 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25183 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30165 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32381 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32415 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32434 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

d?id=CVE-2025-21579 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21580 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21581 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21585 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30682 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30685 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2025-27210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3029 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3029 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-004207SQLite における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

SQLite には、整数オーバーフローの脆弱性、リソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0246Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: * Denial-of-Service (DoS) * Cross-Site Scripting * Manipulatie van gegevens * Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel * (Remote) code execution (SYSTEM rechten) * (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) * Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens * Verhogen van rechten De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Apr 2025 · Last source change 26 Aug 2025, 19:27 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-10698
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    3.49.0 < 3.49.1 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    3.49.0 < 3.49.1 · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-29088 · cve.blacktree.nl