BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-26684High confidence

Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Microsoft · Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux

6.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 13 Feb 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.42% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-14475

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

External control of file name or path in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

What

External control of file name or path in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Why

The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may gain additional privileges.

What

External control of file name or path in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Why

The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may gain additional privileges.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → External Control of File Name or Path → gain additional privileges
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
High: elevated access is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-73 ↗

CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path. The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRHighPrivileges required: The attacker needs elevated or administrative privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Privilege escalationCWE-73
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1048Microsoft Defender: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler authentisierter Angreifer, oder ein Angreifer aus einem angrenzenden Netzwerk kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Microsoft Defender ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erweitern oder Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0408Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Microsoft. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-005337マイクロソフトの Microsoft Defender における権限を昇格される脆弱性

マイクロソフトの Microsoft Defender には、権限を昇格される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6556MS 8월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

코드 실행 취약성 | | Azure Machine Learning | CVE-2025-47995 | Azure Machine Learning 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Security App | CVE-2025-47956 | Windows 보안 앱 스푸핑 취약성 | | SQL Server | CVE-2025-47954 | Microsoft SQL Server 권한 상승 취약성 | | Azure DevOps | CVE-2025-47158 | Azure DevOps Server 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Exchange Server | CVE-2025-33051 | Microsoft Exchange Server 정보 공개 취약성 | | Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol | CVE-2025-29954 | Windows LDAP(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Azure Portal Windows Admin Center | CVE-2025-29819 | Azure Portal의 Windows Admin Center 정보 공개 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2025-26684 | Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Exchange Server | CVE-2025-25007 | Microsoft Exchange Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Exchange Server | CVE-2025-25006 | Microsoft Exchange Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Exchange Server | CVE-2025-25005 | Microsoft Exchange Server 변조 취약성 | | SQL Server | CVE-2025-24999 | Microsoft SQL Server 권한 상승 취약성 | | SQL Server | CVE-2024-49000 | SQL Server Native Client 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | AMD L1 Data Queue | CVE-2024-36357 | AMD: CVE-2025-36357 L1 데이터 큐에서 일시적 스케줄러 공격 | | AMD Store Queue | CVE-2024-36350 | AMD: CVE-2024-36350 스토어 큐에서 일시적 스케줄러 공격 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2024-29187 | GitHub: CVE-2024-29187 WiX Burn 기

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6528MS 7월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

-36350 스토어 큐에서 일시적 스케줄러 공격 | | App Control for Business (WDAC) | CVE-2025-33069 | Windows Business용 앱 컨트롤 보안 기능 바이패스 취약성 | | Remote Desktop Client | CVE-2025-33054 | 원격 데스크톱 스푸핑 취약성 | | Internet Shortcut Files | CVE-2025-33053 | 인터넷 바로가기 파일 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Visual Studio Code | CVE-2025-32726 | Visual Studio Code 권한 상승 취약성 | | M365 Copilot | CVE-2025-32711 | M365 Copilot 정보 공개 취약성 | | .NET and Visual Studio | CVE-2025-30399 | .NET 및 Visual Studio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2025-27614 | MITRE: CVE-2025-27614 Gitk 임의 코드 실행 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2025-27613 | MITRE: CVE-2025-27613 Gitk 인수 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2025-26684 | Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Kernel | CVE-2025-26636 | Windows 커널 정보 유출 취약성 | | Visual Studio Code | CVE-2025-21264 | Visual Studio Code 보안 기능 바이패스 취약성 | | Service Fabric | CVE-2025-21195 | Azure Service Fabric 런타임 권한 상승 취약성 | | Azure Stack | CVE-2024-49060 | Azure Stack HCI 권한 상승 취약성 | | SQL Server | CVE-2024-49000 | SQL Server Native Client 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2024-43614 | Linux의 엔드포인트용 Microsoft Defender 스푸핑 취약성 | | Azure Stack | CVE-2024-38179 | Azure Stack HCI(하이퍼 컨버지드 인프라) 권한 상승 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2024-29187 | GitHub: CVE-2024-29187 WiX Burn 기반 번들은 시스템으로 실행될 때 바이너리 하이재킹에 취약 | |

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6482MS 5월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

s Win32K - GRFX | CVE-2025-27732 | Windows 그래픽 구성 요소 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Digital Media | CVE-2025-27730 | Windows 디지털 미디어 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Shell | CVE-2025-27729 | Windows Shell 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Hardware Lab Kit | CVE-2025-27488 | Microsoft Windows Hardware Lab Kit(HLK) 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Digital Media | CVE-2025-27476 | Windows 디지털 미디어 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Secure Kernel Mode | CVE-2025-27468 | Windows 커널 모드 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Digital Media | CVE-2025-27467 | Windows 디지털 미디어 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Identity | CVE-2025-26685 | Microsoft Defender for Identity 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | CVE-2025-26684 | Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 | | Remote Desktop Gateway Service | CVE-2025-26677 | Windows RD 게이트웨이(원격 데스크톱 게이트웨이) 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol | CVE-2025-26673 | Windows LDAP(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Windows Kerberos | CVE-2025-26647 | Windows Kerberos 권한 상승 취약성 | | .NET, Visual Studio, and Build Tools for Visual Studio | CVE-2025-26646 | .NET, Visual Studio, 및 Build Tools for Visual Studio 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-26642 | Microsoft Office 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-26629 | Microsoft Office 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0157Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Microsoft Defender

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om zich voor te doen als andere gebruiker en zich verhoogde rechten toe te kennen, waarmee uitvoer van willekeurige code met SYSTEM rechten mogelijk wordt. Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende lokale toegang tot het kwetsbare systeem hebben, of toegang hebben tot hetzelfde segment in het LAN waar het kwetsbare systeem zich bevindt. Van de kwetsbaarheid met kenmerk CVE-2025-26685 geeft Microsoft aan informatie te hebben dat deze besproken wordt binnen gesloten fora. Er is (nog) geen publieke Proof-of-Concept vrijgegeven.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux: 101.0.0 < 101.25032.0010
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 May 2025 · Last source change 13 Feb 2026, 19:20 UTC · CWE-73 · External Control of File Name or Path

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-14475
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-26684 · cve.blacktree.nl