BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-26466High confidence

Openssh: denial-of-service in openssh

Unknown · Unknown

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 30 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 39.85% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

8 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.9_p2-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.9_p2-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainopensshVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.9.9_p2-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.9p2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceopensshNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.9p2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceopensshVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1:9.9p2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveopensshVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.1:9.6p1-3ubuntu13.8Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
HPESBNW04888 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · finalHPE Aruba NetworkingDenial-of-Service (DoS) attack against OpenSSH's client and server
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • AOS-CX
Summary
The OpenSSH client and server are vulnerable to a pre-authentication denial-of-service attack: an asymmetric resource consumption of both memory and CPU. This vulnerability was introduced in August 2023 (shortly before OpenSSH 9.5p1) by commit dce6d80 ('Introduce a transport-level ping facility').
Remediation
To address the vulnerabilities described above in the affected software branches, it is recommended to upgrade HPE Aruba Networking AOS-CX to one of the following versions (as applicable): - AOS-CX 10.16.xxxx: AOS-CX 10.16.1006 and above - AOS-CX 10.15.xxxx: AOS-CX 10.15.1030 and above - AOS-CX 10.14.xxxx: AOS-CX 10.14.1060 and above - AOS-CX 10.13.xxxx: AOS-CX 10.13.1101 and above - AOS-CX 10.10.xxxx: AOS-CX 10.10.1170 and above Software versions with resolution/fixes for the vulnerabilities covered above can be downloaded from the HPE Networking Support Portal at https://networkingsupport.hpe.com/home/ HPE Aruba Networking does not evaluate or patch software branches that have reached their End of Maintenance (EoM) milestone. For more information about HPE Aruba Networking End of Life policy please visit: https://www.hpe.com/psnow/doc/a00143052enw
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5920

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

What

A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchange has finished. A malicious client may keep sending such packages, leading to an uncontrolled increase in memory consumption on the server side. Consequently, the server may become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service attack.

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.

Likely attack path
a network path → Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-770 ↗

CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling. The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-770Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1519Juniper JUNOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Privilegieneskalation

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Juniper JUNOS, Juniper MX Series, Juniper SRX Series und Juniper Security Director ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Code auszuführen, einen Denial of Service zu verursachen oder seine Privilegien zu erweitern.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1007Apple macOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple macOS ausnutzen, um erhöhte Privilegien zu erlangen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0394OpenSSH: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSH ausnutzen, um kryptografische Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen und um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2633Aruba AOS-CX: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Aruba AOS-CX ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1021Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits HPE Aruba Networking

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits HPE Aruba Networking. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0583Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

583 Titre Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks Date de la première version 10 juillet 2025 Date de la dernière version 10 juillet 2025 Source(s) Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks 2025-07-Security-Bulletin-Juniper-Apstra-Multiple-Vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Intel-microcode-package du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks 2025-07-Security-Bulletin-Junos-OS-Evolved-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-for-Insecure-Implementation-of-Tunneling-Protocols-GRE-IPIP-4in6-6in4-VU-199397 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2024-3596 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-26466 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-30661 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52946 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52947 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52948 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52949 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52950 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52951 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52952 du 09 juillet 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks CVE-2025-52953 d

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0486Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Qnap

ord?id=CVE-2024-56805 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22482 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22484 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22485 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22486 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0393Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

d?id=CVE-2025-24213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30442 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30443 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30448 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30448 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30453 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0139Multiples vulnérabilités dans OpenSSH

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSH. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-002235OpenBSD の OpenSSH 等複数ベンダの製品におけるエラー対応処理のないエラーの検出に関する脆弱性

OpenBSD の OpenSSH 等複数ベンダの製品には、エラー対応処理のないエラーの検出に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-002140OpenBSD の OpenSSH 等複数ベンダの製品におけるリソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性

OpenBSD の OpenSSH 等複数ベンダの製品には、リソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性、制限またはスロットリング無しのリソースの割り当てに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0166Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Fortinet producten

De kwetsbaarheden omvatten een OS Command Injection die lokale aanvallers in staat stelt om ongeautoriseerde code uit te voeren door CLI-commando-argumenten te manipuleren. Daarnaast zijn er kwetsbaarheden die het mogelijk maken voor aanvallers om ongeautoriseerde wijzigingen aan te brengen in globale dreigingsfeeds en om authenticatie te omzeilen, wat leidt tot administratieve toegang tot de apparaten. Ook zijn er kwetsbaarheden die kunnen leiden tot denial-of-service door het versturen van speciaal vervaardigde verzoeken. Deze kwetsbaarheden kunnen leiden tot controle over de getroffen systemen.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0151Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Apple macOS

De kwetsbaarheden omvatten verschillende problemen, zoals geheugenbeschadiging door het verwerken van kwaadwillig gemaakte webinhoud, ongeautoriseerde toegang tot gevoelige gebruikersdata, en onverwachte systeemterminaties. Deze kwetsbaarheden kunnen worden misbruikt door kwaadwillenden om zich verhoogde rechten toe te kennen en zo toegang te krijgen tot gevoelige informatie of om de stabiliteit van het systeem in gevaar te brengen.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
AOS-CX
Fixed
AOS-CX
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
Official vendor articles1 stored document

Linked articles are downloaded and versioned as source evidence. A CVE mention or approved update relationship does not, by itself, verify a fix for every product branch.

  • PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs →Original publisher ↗Searchable text snapshot · Captured 29 Sep 2026PSIRT Pre-authentication Denial of Service attack in OpenSSH - CVE-2025-26466 Summary CVE-2025-26466 A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of packages. It is only freed when the server/client key exchang
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 28 Feb 2025 · Last source change 30 Jun 2026, 00:24 UTC · CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5920
Product sourceVendor CSAF · HPE Aruba Networking
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · HPE Aruba Networking
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9.5p1 ≤ 9.9p1 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    9.5p1 ≤ 9.9p1 · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-26466 · cve.blacktree.nl