BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-25724High confidence

libarchive — Unchecked Return Value

libarchive · libarchive

4.0MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 0.37% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs libarchive libarchive and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

8 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.7.9-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.7.9-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainlibarchiveVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.3.7.9-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibarchiveAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibarchiveAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.8.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibarchiveVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.8.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelibarchiveVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.3.7.2-2ubuntu0.4Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-25724 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitylibarchive: Buffer Overflow vulnerability in libarchive
13 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • libarchive as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • libarchive-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • libarchive.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • bsdcpio as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • bsdtar as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • libarchive as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • libarchive-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • libarchive.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • bsdtar as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • libarchive as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • libarchive-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • libarchive.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Summary
A flaw was found in the libarchive package. Affected versions of libarchive do not check a strftime return value, which can lead to a denial of service or unspecified other impacts via a crafted TAR archive that is read with a verbose value of 2. For example, the 100-byte buffer may not be sufficient for a custom locale.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5869

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

list_item_verbose in tar/util.c in libarchive through 3.7.7 does not check an strftime return value, which can lead to a denial of service or unspecified other impact via a crafted TAR archive that is read with a verbose value of 2. For example, the 100-byte buffer may not be sufficient for a custom locale.

What

list_item_verbose in tar/util.c in libarchive through 3.7.7 does not check an strftime return value, which can lead to a denial of service or unspecified other impact via a crafted TAR archive that is read with a verbose value of 2. For example, the 100-byte buffer may not be sufficient for a custom locale.

Why

The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

list_item_verbose in tar/util.c in libarchive through 3.7.7 does not check an strftime return value, which can lead to a denial of service or unspecified other impact via a crafted TAR archive that is read with a verbose value of 2. For example, the 100-byte buffer may not be sufficient for a custom locale.

Why

The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Unchecked Return Value → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-252 ↗

CWE-252: Unchecked Return Value. The product does not check the return value from a method or function, which can prevent it from detecting unexpected states and conditions.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-252Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2361Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1850Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0469libarchive: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in libarchive ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26519 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-28162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-28162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-28164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-28164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-24014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24293 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24294 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25186 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26603 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0760Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2533 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29927 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32386 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

VERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26603 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-44

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0585Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

ecord?id=CVE-2024-47814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53920 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7531 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26603 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-009209libarchive における未チェックの戻り値に関する脆弱性

libarchive には、未チェックの戻り値に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0330Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle Communications producten

Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in Oracle Communications Network Analytics Data Director and the libarchive component, affecting system integrity and availability, with CVSS scores indicating significant risks.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Mar 2025 · Last source change 4 Mar 2025, 19:00 UTC · CWE-252 · Unchecked Return Value

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5869
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    ≤ 3.7.7 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    ≤ 3.7.7 · Fixed: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-25724 · cve.blacktree.nl