BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-23384High confidence

Siemens RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU — Partial String Comparison

Siemens · RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU

Official source article: Siemens SSA-280834 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 32 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.28% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Siemens RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 32 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-280834 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-280834: Improper OpenVPN Credential Validation Vulnerability in SCALANCE M-800 and SC-600 Families
32 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2)
  • RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2)
  • SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2)
  • SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router family
  • SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router family
  • SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2)
  • SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2)
  • SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2)
  • SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2)
  • SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2)
  • SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2)
  • SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2)
Summary
Affected devices improperly validate usernames during OpenVPN authentication. This could allow an attacker to get partial invalid usernames accepted by the server.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-7629

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 32 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (A1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (B1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE SC622-2C (6GK5622-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC626-2C (6GK5626-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC632-2C (6GK5632-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC636-2C (6GK5636-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC642-2C (6GK5642-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC646-2C (6GK5646-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2). Affected devices improperly validate usernames during OpenVPN authentication. This could allow an attacker to get partial invalid usernames accepted by the server.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (A1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (B1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE SC622-2C (6GK5622-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC626-2C (6GK5626-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC632-2C (6GK5632-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC636-2C (6GK5636-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC642-2C (6GK5642-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC646-2C (6GK5646-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2). Affected devices improperly validate usernames during OpenVPN authentication. This could allow an attacker to get partial invalid usernames accepted by the server.

Why

The product performs a comparison that only examines a portion of a factor before determining whether there is a match, such as a substring, leading to resultant weaknesses.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (A1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (B1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE SC622-2C (6GK5622-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC626-2C (6GK5626-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC632-2C (6GK5632-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC636-2C (6GK5636-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC642-2C (6GK5642-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC646-2C (6GK5646-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2). Affected devices improperly validate usernames during OpenVPN authentication. This could allow an attacker to get partial invalid usernames accepted by the server.

Why

The product performs a comparison that only examines a portion of a factor before determining whether there is a match, such as a substring, leading to resultant weaknesses.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Partial String Comparison → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-187 ↗

CWE-187: Partial String Comparison. The product performs a comparison that only examines a portion of a factor before determining whether there is a match, such as a substring, leading to resultant weaknesses.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-187
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250312Security Bulletin 12 Mar 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 12 Mar 2025, published on 12 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0191Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0077Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Manipulatie van gegevens - Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (root/admin rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - Toegang tot systeemgegevens - Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens - Spoofing De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Mar 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 08:20 UTC · CWE-187 · Partial String Comparison

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-7629
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Remediation guidance recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-7629↗CVE authority or vendor reference · Siemens SSA-280834↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-23384 · cve.blacktree.nl