BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-23150High confidence

ext4: fix off-by-one error in do_split

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.135-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-23150 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 51 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-23150
395 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix off-by-one error in do_split Syzkaller detected a use-after-free issue in ext4_insert_dentry that was caused by out-of-bounds access due to incorrect splitting in do_split. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 Write of size 251 at addr ffff888074572f14 by task syz-executor335/5847 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5847 Comm: syz-executor335 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-syzkaller-00318-ga9cda7c0ffed #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x40/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:106 ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 add_dirent_to_buf+0x3d9/0x750 fs/ext4/namei.c:2154 make_indexed_dir+0xf98/0x1600 fs/ext4/namei.c:2351 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2455 ext4_add_nondir+0x8d/0x290 fs/ext4/namei.c:2796 ext4_symlink+0x920/0xb50 fs/ext4/namei.c:3431 vfs_symlink+0x137/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4615 do_symlinkat+0x222/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4641 __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4662 [inline] __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4660 [inline] __x64_sys_symlink+0x7a/0x90 fs/namei.c:4660 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f The following loop is located right above 'if' statement. for (i = count-1; i >= 0; i--) { /* is more than half of this entry in 2nd half of the block? */ if (size + map[i].size/2 > blocksize/2) break; size += map[i].size; move++; } 'i' in this case could go down to -1, in which case sum of active entries wouldn't exceed half the block size, but previous behaviour would also do split in half if sum would exceed at the very last block, which in case of having too many long name files in a single block could lead to out-of-bounds access and following use-after-free. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13093

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix off-by-one error in do_split Syzkaller detected a use-after-free issue in ext4_insert_dentry that was caused by out-of-bounds access due to incorrect splitting in do_split. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 Write of size 251 at addr ffff888074572f14 by task syz-executor335/5847 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5847 Comm: syz-executor335 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-syzkaller-00318-ga9cda7c0ffed #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x40/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:106 ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 add_dirent_to_buf+0x3d9/0x750 fs/ext4/namei.c:2154 make_indexed_dir+0xf98/0x1600 fs/ext4/namei.c:2351 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2455 ext4_add_nondir+0x8d/0x290 fs/ext4/namei.c:2796 ext4_symlink+0x920/0xb50 fs/ext4/namei.c:3431 vfs_symlink+0x137/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4615 do_symlinkat+0x222/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4641 __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4662 [inline] __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4660 [inline] __x64_sys_symlink+0x7a/0x90 fs/namei.c:4660 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> The following loop is located right above 'if' statement. for (i = count-1; i >= 0; i--) { /* is more than half of this entry in 2nd half of the block? */ if (size + map[i].size/2 > blocksize/2) break; size += map[i].size; move++; } 'i' in this case could go down to -1, in which case sum of active entries wouldn't exceed half the block size, but previous behaviour would also do split in half if sum would exceed at the very last block, which in case of having too many long name files in a single block could lead to out-of-bounds access and following use-after-free. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix off-by-one error in do_split Syzkaller detected a use-after-free issue in ext4_insert_dentry that was caused by out-of-bounds access due to incorrect splitting in do_split. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 Write of size 251 at addr ffff888074572f14 by task syz-executor335/5847 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5847 Comm: syz-executor335 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-syzkaller-00318-ga9cda7c0ffed #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x40/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:106 ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 add_dirent_to_buf+0x3d9/0x750 fs/ext4/namei.c:2154 make_indexed_dir+0xf98/0x1600 fs/ext4/namei.c:2351 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2455 ext4_add_nondir+0x8d/0x290 fs/ext4/namei.c:2796 ext4_symlink+0x920/0xb50 fs/ext4/namei.c:3431 vfs_symlink+0x137/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4615 do_symlinkat+0x222/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4641 __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4662 [inline] __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4660 [inline] __x64_sys_symlink+0x7a/0x90 fs/namei.c:4660 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> The following loop is located right above 'if' statement. for (i = count-1; i >= 0; i--) { /* is more than half of this entry in 2nd half of the block? */ if (size + map[i].size/2 > blocksize/2) break; size += map[i].size; move++; } 'i' in this case could go down to -1, in which case sum of active entries wouldn't exceed half the block size, but previous behaviour would also do split in half if sum would exceed at the very last block, which in case of having too many long name files in a single block could lead to out-of-bounds access and following use-after-free. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix off-by-one error in do_split Syzkaller detected a use-after-free issue in ext4_insert_dentry that was caused by out-of-bounds access due to incorrect splitting in do_split. BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 Write of size 251 at addr ffff888074572f14 by task syz-executor335/5847 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5847 Comm: syz-executor335 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-syzkaller-00318-ga9cda7c0ffed #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 __asan_memcpy+0x40/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:106 ext4_insert_dentry+0x36a/0x6d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2109 add_dirent_to_buf+0x3d9/0x750 fs/ext4/namei.c:2154 make_indexed_dir+0xf98/0x1600 fs/ext4/namei.c:2351 ext4_add_entry+0x222a/0x25d0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2455 ext4_add_nondir+0x8d/0x290 fs/ext4/namei.c:2796 ext4_symlink+0x920/0xb50 fs/ext4/namei.c:3431 vfs_symlink+0x137/0x2e0 fs/namei.c:4615 do_symlinkat+0x222/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4641 __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4662 [inline] __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4660 [inline] __x64_sys_symlink+0x7a/0x90 fs/namei.c:4660 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> The following loop is located right above 'if' statement. for (i = count-1; i >= 0; i--) { /* is more than half of this entry in 2nd half of the block? */ if (size + map[i].size/2 > blocksize/2) break; size += map[i].size; move++; } 'i' in this case could go down to -1, in which case sum of active entries wouldn't exceed half the block size, but previous behaviour would also do split in half if sum would exceed at the very last block, which in case of having too many long name files in a single block could lead to out-of-bounds access and following use-after-free. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Why

A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Off-by-one Error → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-193 ↗

CWE-193: Off-by-one Error. A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-193
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1905IBM QRadar SIEM Komponente: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM Komponenten ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, und um Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-20012 Référence CVE CVE-2025-20623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-20623 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21587 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24495 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0744Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2022-50044 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0699Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0669Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2025-21905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0670Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0650Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0626Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0606Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, une atteinte à l'intégrité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018599Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における境界条件の判定に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、境界条件の判定に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.9, 5.4.293 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.237 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.181 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.135 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.88 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.3 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC · CWE-193 · Off-by-one Error

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13093
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-23150 · cve.blacktree.nl