BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-23143High confidence

net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod.

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.153-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-032379 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-032379: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC CN 4100 Before V5.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC CN 4100
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---
Remediation
Update to V5.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13094

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: <IRQ> __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: <IRQ> __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: <IRQ> __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: <IRQ> __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13094Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Fix null-ptr-deref by sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and rmmod. When I ran the repro [0] and waited a few seconds, I observed two LOCKDEP splats: a warning immediately followed by a null-ptr-deref. [1] Reproduction Steps: 1) Mount CIFS 2) Add an iptables rule to drop incoming FIN packets for CIFS 3) Unmount CIFS 4) Unload the CIFS module 5) Remove the iptables rule At step 3), the CIFS module calls sock_release() for the underlying TCP socket, and it returns quickly. However, the socket remains in FIN_WAIT_1 because incoming FIN packets are dropped. At this point, the module's refcnt is 0 while the socket is still alive, so the following rmmod command succeeds. # ss -tan State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port FIN-WAIT-1 0 477 10.0.2.15:51062 10.0.0.137:445 # lsmod | grep cifs cifs 1159168 0 This highlights a discrepancy between the lifetime of the CIFS module and the underlying TCP socket. Even after CIFS calls sock_release() and it returns, the TCP socket does not die immediately in order to close the connection gracefully. While this is generally fine, it causes an issue with LOCKDEP because CIFS assigns a different lock class to the TCP socket's sk->sk_lock using sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). Once an incoming packet is processed for the socket or a timer fires, sk->sk_lock is acquired. Then, LOCKDEP checks the lock context in check_wait_context(), where hlock_class() is called to retrieve the lock class. However, since the module has already been unloaded, hlock_class() logs a warning and returns NULL, triggering the null-ptr-deref. If LOCKDEP is enabled, we must ensure that a module calling sock_lock_init_class_and_name() (CIFS, NFS, etc) cannot be unloaded while such a socket is still alive to prevent this issue. Let's hold the module reference in sock_lock_init_class_and_name() and release it when the socket is freed in sk_prot_free(). Note that sock_lock_init() clears sk->sk_owner for svc_create_socket() that calls sock_lock_init_class_and_name() for a listening socket, which clones a socket by sk_clone_lock() without GFP_ZERO. [0]: CIFS_SERVER="10.0.0.137" CIFS_PATH="//${CIFS_SERVER}/Users/Administrator/Desktop/CIFS_TEST" DEV="enp0s3" CRED="/root/WindowsCredential.txt" MNT=$(mktemp -d /tmp/XXXXXX) mount -t cifs ${CIFS_PATH} ${MNT} -o vers=3.0,credentials=${CRED},cache=none,echo_interval=1 iptables -A INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP for i in $(seq 10); do umount ${MNT} rmmod cifs sleep 1 done rm -r ${MNT} iptables -D INPUT -s ${CIFS_SERVER} -j DROP [1]: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1) WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) Modules linked in: cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils cifs_md4 [last unloaded: cifs] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Not tainted 6.14.0 #36 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hlock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:234 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:223) ... Call Trace: <IRQ> __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5178) lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:469 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5853 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5816) _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379) tcp_v4_rcv (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1678 ./include/net/tcp.h:2547 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2350) ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c4 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/10 Tainted: G W 6.14.0 #36 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire (kernel/ ---truncated---

Official EUVD record ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0565Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

92349.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens SSA-688146 du 12 mai 2026 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-688146.html Bulletin de sécurité Siemens SSA-786884 du 12 mai 2026 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-786884.html Référence CVE CVE-2024-47704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0209Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-15367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-3360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38561 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0199Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24294 Référence CVE CVE-2025-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30698 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30698 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1136Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

LA-4404-1 du 12 décembre 2025 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/12/msg00015.html Référence CVE CVE-2023-53498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53498 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38678 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0894Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21912 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0825Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-47704 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38306 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018792Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel 等複数ベンダの製品には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple security vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel and AppArmor LSM affecting various architectures and subsystems were fixed, including null pointer dereferences and privilege escalation risks, to enhance system security and prevent local attacks.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.20, 5.4.300 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.245 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.194 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.153 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.107 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.3 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13094
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 83083c5fc7cf9b0f136a42f26aba60da380f3601; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < b7489b753667bc9245958a4896c9419743083c27; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < d51e47e2ab6ef10a317d576075cf625cdbf96426; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < feda73ad44a5cc80f6bf796bb1099a3fe71576d4; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 905d43b8ad2436c240f844acb3ebcc7a99b8ebf1; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 5f7f6abd92b6c8dc8f19625ef93c3a18549ede04; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < c11247a21aab4b50a23c8b696727d7483de2f1e1; ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 2155802d3313d7b8365935c6b8d6edc0ddd7eb94 · Fixed: < 2.6.20; 5.4.300 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.245 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.194 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.153 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.107 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*
    After
    Linux: ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 83083c5fc7cf9b0f136a42f26aba60da380f3601, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < b7489b753667bc9245958a4896c9419743083c27, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < d51e47e2ab6ef10a317d576075cf625cdbf96426, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < feda73ad44a5cc80f6bf796bb1099a3fe71576d4, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 905d43b8ad2436c240f844acb3ebcc7a99b8ebf1, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 5f7f6abd92b6c8dc8f19625ef93c3a18549ede04, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < c11247a21aab4b50a23c8b696727d7483de2f1e1, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 2155802d3313d7b8365935c6b8d6edc0ddd7eb94, ed07536ed6731775219c1df7fa26a7588753e693 < 0bb2f7a1ad1f11d861f58e5ee5051c8974ff9569, 2.6.20 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.20, 5.4.300 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.245 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.194 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.153 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.107 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.24 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.12 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.3 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-23143 · cve.blacktree.nl