BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-22115High confidence

btrfs: fix block group refcount race in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

21 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11180

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix block group refcount race in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() Block group creation is done in two phases, which results in a slightly unintuitive property: a block group can be allocated/deallocated from after btrfs_make_block_group() adds it to the space_info with btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), but before creation is completely completed in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). As a result, it is possible for a block group to go unused and have 'btrfs_mark_bg_unused' called on it concurrently with 'btrfs_create_pending_block_groups'. This causes a number of issues, which were fixed with the block group flag 'BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW'. However, this fix is not quite complete. Since it does not use the unused_bg_lock, it is possible for the following race to occur: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups btrfs_mark_bg_unused if list_empty // false list_del_init clear_bit else if (test_bit) // true list_move_tail And we get into the exact same broken ref count and invalid new_bgs state for transaction cleanup that BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW was designed to prevent. The broken refcount aspect will result in a warning like: [1272.943527] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. [1272.943967] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 61 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.944731] Modules linked in: btrfs virtio_net xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk [last unloaded: btrfs] [1272.945550] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc5+ #108 [1272.946368] Tainted: [W]=WARN [1272.946585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [1272.947273] Workqueue: btrfs_discard btrfs_discard_workfn [btrfs] [1272.947788] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.949532] RSP: 0018:ffffbf1200247df0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1272.949901] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa14b00e3f800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [1272.950437] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbf1200247c78 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff [1272.950986] RBP: ffffa14b00dc2860 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffff90526268 [1272.951512] R10: ffffffff904762c0 R11: 0000000063666572 R12: ffffa14b00dc28c0 [1272.952024] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa14b00dc2868 R15: 000001285dcd12c0 [1272.952850] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa14d33c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1272.953458] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1272.953931] CR2: 00007f838cbda000 CR3: 000000010104e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [1272.954474] Call Trace: [1272.954655] <TASK> [1272.954812] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955173] ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xd7 [1272.955487] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955816] ? report_bug+0xe7/0x120 [1272.956103] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 [1272.956424] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [1272.956700] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1272.957011] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.957399] btrfs_discard_cancel_work.cold+0x26/0x2b [btrfs] [1272.957853] btrfs_put_block_group.cold+0x5d/0x8e [btrfs] [1272.958289] btrfs_discard_workfn+0x194/0x380 [btrfs] [1272.958729] process_one_work+0x130/0x290 [1272.959026] worker_thread+0x2ea/0x420 [1272.959335] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [1272.959644] kthread+0xd7/0x1c0 [1272.959872] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960172] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [1272.960474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960745] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [1272.961035] </TASK> [1272.961238] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Though we have seen them in the async discard workfn as well. It is most likely to happen after a relocation finishes which cancels discard, tears down the block group, etc. Fix this fully by taking the lock arou ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix block group refcount race in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() Block group creation is done in two phases, which results in a slightly unintuitive property: a block group can be allocated/deallocated from after btrfs_make_block_group() adds it to the space_info with btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), but before creation is completely completed in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). As a result, it is possible for a block group to go unused and have 'btrfs_mark_bg_unused' called on it concurrently with 'btrfs_create_pending_block_groups'. This causes a number of issues, which were fixed with the block group flag 'BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW'. However, this fix is not quite complete. Since it does not use the unused_bg_lock, it is possible for the following race to occur: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups btrfs_mark_bg_unused if list_empty // false list_del_init clear_bit else if (test_bit) // true list_move_tail And we get into the exact same broken ref count and invalid new_bgs state for transaction cleanup that BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW was designed to prevent. The broken refcount aspect will result in a warning like: [1272.943527] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. [1272.943967] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 61 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.944731] Modules linked in: btrfs virtio_net xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk [last unloaded: btrfs] [1272.945550] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc5+ #108 [1272.946368] Tainted: [W]=WARN [1272.946585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [1272.947273] Workqueue: btrfs_discard btrfs_discard_workfn [btrfs] [1272.947788] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.949532] RSP: 0018:ffffbf1200247df0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1272.949901] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa14b00e3f800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [1272.950437] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbf1200247c78 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff [1272.950986] RBP: ffffa14b00dc2860 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffff90526268 [1272.951512] R10: ffffffff904762c0 R11: 0000000063666572 R12: ffffa14b00dc28c0 [1272.952024] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa14b00dc2868 R15: 000001285dcd12c0 [1272.952850] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa14d33c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1272.953458] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1272.953931] CR2: 00007f838cbda000 CR3: 000000010104e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [1272.954474] Call Trace: [1272.954655] <TASK> [1272.954812] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955173] ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xd7 [1272.955487] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955816] ? report_bug+0xe7/0x120 [1272.956103] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 [1272.956424] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [1272.956700] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1272.957011] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.957399] btrfs_discard_cancel_work.cold+0x26/0x2b [btrfs] [1272.957853] btrfs_put_block_group.cold+0x5d/0x8e [btrfs] [1272.958289] btrfs_discard_workfn+0x194/0x380 [btrfs] [1272.958729] process_one_work+0x130/0x290 [1272.959026] worker_thread+0x2ea/0x420 [1272.959335] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [1272.959644] kthread+0xd7/0x1c0 [1272.959872] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960172] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [1272.960474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960745] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [1272.961035] </TASK> [1272.961238] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Though we have seen them in the async discard workfn as well. It is most likely to happen after a relocation finishes which cancels discard, tears down the block group, etc. Fix this fully by taking the lock arou ---truncated---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix block group refcount race in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() Block group creation is done in two phases, which results in a slightly unintuitive property: a block group can be allocated/deallocated from after btrfs_make_block_group() adds it to the space_info with btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), but before creation is completely completed in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). As a result, it is possible for a block group to go unused and have 'btrfs_mark_bg_unused' called on it concurrently with 'btrfs_create_pending_block_groups'. This causes a number of issues, which were fixed with the block group flag 'BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW'. However, this fix is not quite complete. Since it does not use the unused_bg_lock, it is possible for the following race to occur: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups btrfs_mark_bg_unused if list_empty // false list_del_init clear_bit else if (test_bit) // true list_move_tail And we get into the exact same broken ref count and invalid new_bgs state for transaction cleanup that BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW was designed to prevent. The broken refcount aspect will result in a warning like: [1272.943527] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. [1272.943967] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 61 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.944731] Modules linked in: btrfs virtio_net xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk [last unloaded: btrfs] [1272.945550] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc5+ #108 [1272.946368] Tainted: [W]=WARN [1272.946585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [1272.947273] Workqueue: btrfs_discard btrfs_discard_workfn [btrfs] [1272.947788] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.949532] RSP: 0018:ffffbf1200247df0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1272.949901] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa14b00e3f800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [1272.950437] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbf1200247c78 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff [1272.950986] RBP: ffffa14b00dc2860 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffff90526268 [1272.951512] R10: ffffffff904762c0 R11: 0000000063666572 R12: ffffa14b00dc28c0 [1272.952024] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa14b00dc2868 R15: 000001285dcd12c0 [1272.952850] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa14d33c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1272.953458] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1272.953931] CR2: 00007f838cbda000 CR3: 000000010104e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [1272.954474] Call Trace: [1272.954655] <TASK> [1272.954812] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955173] ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xd7 [1272.955487] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.955816] ? report_bug+0xe7/0x120 [1272.956103] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 [1272.956424] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60 [1272.956700] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1272.957011] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110 [1272.957399] btrfs_discard_cancel_work.cold+0x26/0x2b [btrfs] [1272.957853] btrfs_put_block_group.cold+0x5d/0x8e [btrfs] [1272.958289] btrfs_discard_workfn+0x194/0x380 [btrfs] [1272.958729] process_one_work+0x130/0x290 [1272.959026] worker_thread+0x2ea/0x420 [1272.959335] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [1272.959644] kthread+0xd7/0x1c0 [1272.959872] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960172] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [1272.960474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [1272.960745] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [1272.961035] </TASK> [1272.961238] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Though we have seen them in the async discard workfn as well. It is most likely to happen after a relocation finishes which cancels discard, tears down the block group, etc. Fix this fully by taking the lock arou ---truncated---

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0844Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0698Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

DSA-5975-1 du 13 août 2025 https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2025/msg00139.html Référence CVE CVE-2024-36350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0624Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
0657b20c5a76c938612f8409735a8830d257866e < ee56da95f8962b86fec4ef93f866e64c8d025a58; 0657b20c5a76c938612f8409735a8830d257866e < 9d383a6fc59271aaaf07a33b23b2eac5b9268b7a; 0657b20c5a76c938612f8409735a8830d257866e < 2d8e5168d48a91e7a802d3003e72afb4304bebfa; 6297644db23f77c02ae7961cc542d162629ae2c4; 7569c4294ba6ff9f194635b14876198f8a687c4a; 6.1.47 < 6.2; 6.4.12 < 6.5; 6.5
Fixed
< 6.5; 6.12.40 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*; 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11180
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-22115 · cve.blacktree.nl