BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-22102High confidence

Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

25 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.30-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-22102 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 43 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-22102
58 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release This fixes a kernel panic seen during release FW in a stress test scenario where WLAN and BT FW download occurs simultaneously, and due to a HW bug, chip sends out only 1 bootloader signatures. When driver receives the bootloader signature, it enters FW download mode, but since no consequtive bootloader signatures seen, FW file is not requested. After 60 seconds, when FW download times out, release_firmware causes a kernel panic. [ 2601.949184] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000312e6f006573 [ 2601.992076] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000111802000 [ 2601.992080] [0000312e6f006573] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 2601.992087] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2601.992091] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btnxpuart(O) pciexxx(O) mlan(O) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce snd_soc_fsl_easrc snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_micfil polyval_generic snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_fsl_asrc snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_imx_hdmi snd_soc_fsl_aud2htx snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma dw_hdmi_cec flexcan can_dev [ 2602.001825] CPU: 2 PID: 20060 Comm: hciconfig Tainted: G C O 6.6.23-lts-next-06236-gb586a521770e #1 [ 2602.010182] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) [ 2602.010185] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2602.010191] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.010201] lr : free_fw_priv+0x20/0xfc [ 2602.020561] sp : ffff800089363b30 [ 2602.020563] x29: ffff800089363b30 x28: ffff0000d0eb5880 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020570] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000d728b330 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020577] x23: ffff0000dc856f38 [ 2602.033797] x22: ffff800089363b70 x21: ffff0000dc856000 [ 2602.033802] x20: ff00312e6f006573 x19: ffff0000d0d9ea80 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.033809] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaad80dd480 [ 2602.083320] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000001b9 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 2602.083326] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800089363a30 [ 2602.083333] x8 : ffff0001793d75c0 x7 : ffff0000d6dbc400 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 2602.083339] x5 : 00000000410fd030 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 2602.083346] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ff00312e6f006573 [ 2602.083354] Call trace: [ 2602.083356] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.083364] release_firmware+0x48/0x6c [ 2602.083370] nxp_setup+0x3c4/0x540 [btnxpuart] [ 2602.083383] hci_dev_open_sync+0xf0/0xa34 [ 2602.083391] hci_dev_open+0xd8/0x178 [ 2602.083399] hci_sock_ioctl+0x3b0/0x590 [ 2602.083405] sock_do_ioctl+0x60/0x118 [ 2602.083413] sock_ioctl+0x2f4/0x374 [ 2602.091430] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf0 [ 2602.091437] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 2602.091445] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 [ 2602.091452] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2602.091457] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4 [ 2602.091465] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 2602.091470] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11210

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release This fixes a kernel panic seen during release FW in a stress test scenario where WLAN and BT FW download occurs simultaneously, and due to a HW bug, chip sends out only 1 bootloader signatures. When driver receives the bootloader signature, it enters FW download mode, but since no consequtive bootloader signatures seen, FW file is not requested. After 60 seconds, when FW download times out, release_firmware causes a kernel panic. [ 2601.949184] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000312e6f006573 [ 2601.992076] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000111802000 [ 2601.992080] [0000312e6f006573] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 2601.992087] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2601.992091] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btnxpuart(O) pciexxx(O) mlan(O) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce snd_soc_fsl_easrc snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_micfil polyval_generic snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_fsl_asrc snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_imx_hdmi snd_soc_fsl_aud2htx snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma dw_hdmi_cec flexcan can_dev [ 2602.001825] CPU: 2 PID: 20060 Comm: hciconfig Tainted: G C O 6.6.23-lts-next-06236-gb586a521770e #1 [ 2602.010182] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) [ 2602.010185] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2602.010191] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.010201] lr : free_fw_priv+0x20/0xfc [ 2602.020561] sp : ffff800089363b30 [ 2602.020563] x29: ffff800089363b30 x28: ffff0000d0eb5880 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020570] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000d728b330 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020577] x23: ffff0000dc856f38 [ 2602.033797] x22: ffff800089363b70 x21: ffff0000dc856000 [ 2602.033802] x20: ff00312e6f006573 x19: ffff0000d0d9ea80 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.033809] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaad80dd480 [ 2602.083320] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000001b9 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 2602.083326] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800089363a30 [ 2602.083333] x8 : ffff0001793d75c0 x7 : ffff0000d6dbc400 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 2602.083339] x5 : 00000000410fd030 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 2602.083346] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ff00312e6f006573 [ 2602.083354] Call trace: [ 2602.083356] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.083364] release_firmware+0x48/0x6c [ 2602.083370] nxp_setup+0x3c4/0x540 [btnxpuart] [ 2602.083383] hci_dev_open_sync+0xf0/0xa34 [ 2602.083391] hci_dev_open+0xd8/0x178 [ 2602.083399] hci_sock_ioctl+0x3b0/0x590 [ 2602.083405] sock_do_ioctl+0x60/0x118 [ 2602.083413] sock_ioctl+0x2f4/0x374 [ 2602.091430] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf0 [ 2602.091437] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 2602.091445] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 [ 2602.091452] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2602.091457] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4 [ 2602.091465] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 2602.091470] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release This fixes a kernel panic seen during release FW in a stress test scenario where WLAN and BT FW download occurs simultaneously, and due to a HW bug, chip sends out only 1 bootloader signatures. When driver receives the bootloader signature, it enters FW download mode, but since no consequtive bootloader signatures seen, FW file is not requested. After 60 seconds, when FW download times out, release_firmware causes a kernel panic. [ 2601.949184] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000312e6f006573 [ 2601.992076] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000111802000 [ 2601.992080] [0000312e6f006573] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 2601.992087] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2601.992091] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btnxpuart(O) pciexxx(O) mlan(O) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce snd_soc_fsl_easrc snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_micfil polyval_generic snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_fsl_asrc snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_imx_hdmi snd_soc_fsl_aud2htx snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma dw_hdmi_cec flexcan can_dev [ 2602.001825] CPU: 2 PID: 20060 Comm: hciconfig Tainted: G C O 6.6.23-lts-next-06236-gb586a521770e #1 [ 2602.010182] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) [ 2602.010185] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2602.010191] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.010201] lr : free_fw_priv+0x20/0xfc [ 2602.020561] sp : ffff800089363b30 [ 2602.020563] x29: ffff800089363b30 x28: ffff0000d0eb5880 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020570] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000d728b330 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020577] x23: ffff0000dc856f38 [ 2602.033797] x22: ffff800089363b70 x21: ffff0000dc856000 [ 2602.033802] x20: ff00312e6f006573 x19: ffff0000d0d9ea80 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.033809] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaad80dd480 [ 2602.083320] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000001b9 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 2602.083326] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800089363a30 [ 2602.083333] x8 : ffff0001793d75c0 x7 : ffff0000d6dbc400 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 2602.083339] x5 : 00000000410fd030 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 2602.083346] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ff00312e6f006573 [ 2602.083354] Call trace: [ 2602.083356] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.083364] release_firmware+0x48/0x6c [ 2602.083370] nxp_setup+0x3c4/0x540 [btnxpuart] [ 2602.083383] hci_dev_open_sync+0xf0/0xa34 [ 2602.083391] hci_dev_open+0xd8/0x178 [ 2602.083399] hci_sock_ioctl+0x3b0/0x590 [ 2602.083405] sock_do_ioctl+0x60/0x118 [ 2602.083413] sock_ioctl+0x2f4/0x374 [ 2602.091430] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf0 [ 2602.091437] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 2602.091445] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 [ 2602.091452] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2602.091457] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4 [ 2602.091465] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 2602.091470] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Fix kernel panic during FW release This fixes a kernel panic seen during release FW in a stress test scenario where WLAN and BT FW download occurs simultaneously, and due to a HW bug, chip sends out only 1 bootloader signatures. When driver receives the bootloader signature, it enters FW download mode, but since no consequtive bootloader signatures seen, FW file is not requested. After 60 seconds, when FW download times out, release_firmware causes a kernel panic. [ 2601.949184] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000312e6f006573 [ 2601.992076] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000111802000 [ 2601.992080] [0000312e6f006573] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 2601.992087] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2601.992091] Modules linked in: algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg btnxpuart(O) pciexxx(O) mlan(O) overlay fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc caamalg_desc crypto_engine authenc libdes crct10dif_ce polyval_ce snd_soc_fsl_easrc snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card imx8_media_dev(C) snd_soc_fsl_micfil polyval_generic snd_soc_fsl_xcvr snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_fsl_asrc snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_imx_hdmi snd_soc_fsl_aud2htx snd_soc_fsl_utils imx_pcm_dma dw_hdmi_cec flexcan can_dev [ 2602.001825] CPU: 2 PID: 20060 Comm: hciconfig Tainted: G C O 6.6.23-lts-next-06236-gb586a521770e #1 [ 2602.010182] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MPlus EVK board (DT) [ 2602.010185] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2602.010191] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.010201] lr : free_fw_priv+0x20/0xfc [ 2602.020561] sp : ffff800089363b30 [ 2602.020563] x29: ffff800089363b30 x28: ffff0000d0eb5880 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020570] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0000d728b330 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.020577] x23: ffff0000dc856f38 [ 2602.033797] x22: ffff800089363b70 x21: ffff0000dc856000 [ 2602.033802] x20: ff00312e6f006573 x19: ffff0000d0d9ea80 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2602.033809] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaaad80dd480 [ 2602.083320] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000000000001b9 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 2602.083326] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff800089363a30 [ 2602.083333] x8 : ffff0001793d75c0 x7 : ffff0000d6dbc400 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 2602.083339] x5 : 00000000410fd030 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 2602.083346] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ff00312e6f006573 [ 2602.083354] Call trace: [ 2602.083356] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x68 [ 2602.083364] release_firmware+0x48/0x6c [ 2602.083370] nxp_setup+0x3c4/0x540 [btnxpuart] [ 2602.083383] hci_dev_open_sync+0xf0/0xa34 [ 2602.083391] hci_dev_open+0xd8/0x178 [ 2602.083399] hci_sock_ioctl+0x3b0/0x590 [ 2602.083405] sock_do_ioctl+0x60/0x118 [ 2602.083413] sock_ioctl+0x2f4/0x374 [ 2602.091430] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf0 [ 2602.091437] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 2602.091445] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 [ 2602.091452] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2602.091457] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4 [ 2602.091465] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 2602.091470] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0844Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250417Security Bulletin 17 April 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 April 2025, published on 17 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0246Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-36357 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50299 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018809Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.4, 6.6.92 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.30 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11210
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-22102 · cve.blacktree.nl