BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-22090High confidence

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.3HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11206

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.3 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 25 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11206Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables. Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied. The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong. So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation. Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run. A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try: https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180 Likely this case was missed in: d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed") ... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag. Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0844Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250417Security Bulletin 17 April 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 April 2025, published on 17 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2023-54321 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2023-54285 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0058Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37925 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1008Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37937 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0745Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-42134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22092 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0482Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018437Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.29, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Apr 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11206
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < a6623712ba8449876f0b3de9462831523fb851e4; 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < b07398e8a5da517083f5c3f2daa8f6681b48ab28; 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < 8d6373f83f367dbed316ddeb178130a3a64b5b67; 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < da381c33f3aa6406406c9fdf07b8b0b63e0ce722; 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < de6185b8892d88142ef69768fe4077cbf40109c0; 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < dc84bc2aba85a1508f04a936f9f9a15f64ebfb31; 2.6.29 · Fixed: < 2.6.29; 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*; 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*; 6.15 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < a6623712ba8449876f0b3de9462831523fb851e4, 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < b07398e8a5da517083f5c3f2daa8f6681b48ab28, 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < 8d6373f83f367dbed316ddeb178130a3a64b5b67, 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < da381c33f3aa6406406c9fdf07b8b0b63e0ce722, 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < de6185b8892d88142ef69768fe4077cbf40109c0, 2ab640379a0ab4cef746ced1d7e04a0941774bcb < dc84bc2aba85a1508f04a936f9f9a15f64ebfb31, 2.6.29 · Fixed: Linux: < 2.6.29, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-22090 · cve.blacktree.nl