BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-22061High confidence

net: airoha: Fix qid report in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11241

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: airoha: Fix qid report in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue() Fix the following kernel warning deleting HTB offloaded leafs and/or root HTB qdisc in airoha_eth driver properly reporting qid in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue routine. $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 root handle 10: htb offload $tc class add dev eth1 arent 10: classid 10:4 htb rate 100mbit ceil 100mbit $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 4: ets bands 8 \ quanta 1514 3028 4542 6056 7570 9084 10598 12112 $tc qdisc del dev eth1 root [ 55.827864] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 55.832493] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2678 at 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.956510] CPU: 3 PID: 2678 Comm: tc Tainted: G O 6.6.71 #0 [ 55.963557] Hardware name: Airoha AN7581 Evaluation Board (DT) [ 55.969383] pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 55.976344] pc : 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.979851] lr : 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 55.983358] sp : ffffffc0850536a0 [ 55.986665] x29: ffffffc0850536a0 x28: 0000000000000024 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 55.993800] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffff8008b19000 x24: ffffff800222e800 [ 56.000935] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff8008b19000 [ 56.008071] x20: ffffff8002225800 x19: ffffff800379d000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 56.015206] x17: ffffffbf9ea59000 x16: ffffffc080018000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 56.022342] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 56.029478] x11: ffffffc081471008 x10: ffffffc081575a98 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 56.036614] x8 : ffffffc08167fd40 x7 : ffffffc08069e104 x6 : ffffff8007f86000 [ 56.043748] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 56.050884] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000250 x0 : ffffff800222c000 [ 56.058020] Call trace: [ 56.060459] 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 56.063618] 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 56.066777] __qdisc_destroy+0x40/0xa0 [ 56.070528] qdisc_put+0x54/0x6c [ 56.073748] qdisc_graft+0x41c/0x648 [ 56.077324] tc_get_qdisc+0x168/0x2f8 [ 56.080978] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x230/0x330 [ 56.085076] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x128 [ 56.088913] rtnetlink_rcv+0x14/0x1c [ 56.092490] netlink_unicast+0x1e0/0x2c8 [ 56.096413] netlink_sendmsg+0x198/0x3c8 [ 56.100337] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1c4/0x274 [ 56.104261] ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xc0 [ 56.107924] __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x98 [ 56.111492] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x20/0x28 [ 56.115580] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x58/0xfc [ 56.120285] do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc [ 56.123592] el0_svc+0x18/0x4c [ 56.126647] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 [ 56.131005] el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 [ 56.134660] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: airoha: Fix qid report in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue() Fix the following kernel warning deleting HTB offloaded leafs and/or root HTB qdisc in airoha_eth driver properly reporting qid in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue routine. $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 root handle 10: htb offload $tc class add dev eth1 arent 10: classid 10:4 htb rate 100mbit ceil 100mbit $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 4: ets bands 8 \ quanta 1514 3028 4542 6056 7570 9084 10598 12112 $tc qdisc del dev eth1 root [ 55.827864] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 55.832493] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2678 at 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.956510] CPU: 3 PID: 2678 Comm: tc Tainted: G O 6.6.71 #0 [ 55.963557] Hardware name: Airoha AN7581 Evaluation Board (DT) [ 55.969383] pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 55.976344] pc : 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.979851] lr : 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 55.983358] sp : ffffffc0850536a0 [ 55.986665] x29: ffffffc0850536a0 x28: 0000000000000024 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 55.993800] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffff8008b19000 x24: ffffff800222e800 [ 56.000935] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff8008b19000 [ 56.008071] x20: ffffff8002225800 x19: ffffff800379d000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 56.015206] x17: ffffffbf9ea59000 x16: ffffffc080018000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 56.022342] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 56.029478] x11: ffffffc081471008 x10: ffffffc081575a98 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 56.036614] x8 : ffffffc08167fd40 x7 : ffffffc08069e104 x6 : ffffff8007f86000 [ 56.043748] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 56.050884] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000250 x0 : ffffff800222c000 [ 56.058020] Call trace: [ 56.060459] 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 56.063618] 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 56.066777] __qdisc_destroy+0x40/0xa0 [ 56.070528] qdisc_put+0x54/0x6c [ 56.073748] qdisc_graft+0x41c/0x648 [ 56.077324] tc_get_qdisc+0x168/0x2f8 [ 56.080978] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x230/0x330 [ 56.085076] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x128 [ 56.088913] rtnetlink_rcv+0x14/0x1c [ 56.092490] netlink_unicast+0x1e0/0x2c8 [ 56.096413] netlink_sendmsg+0x198/0x3c8 [ 56.100337] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1c4/0x274 [ 56.104261] ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xc0 [ 56.107924] __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x98 [ 56.111492] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x20/0x28 [ 56.115580] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x58/0xfc [ 56.120285] do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc [ 56.123592] el0_svc+0x18/0x4c [ 56.126647] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 [ 56.131005] el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 [ 56.134660] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: airoha: Fix qid report in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue() Fix the following kernel warning deleting HTB offloaded leafs and/or root HTB qdisc in airoha_eth driver properly reporting qid in airoha_tc_get_htb_get_leaf_queue routine. $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 root handle 10: htb offload $tc class add dev eth1 arent 10: classid 10:4 htb rate 100mbit ceil 100mbit $tc qdisc replace dev eth1 parent 10:4 handle 4: ets bands 8 \ quanta 1514 3028 4542 6056 7570 9084 10598 12112 $tc qdisc del dev eth1 root [ 55.827864] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 55.832493] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2678 at 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.956510] CPU: 3 PID: 2678 Comm: tc Tainted: G O 6.6.71 #0 [ 55.963557] Hardware name: Airoha AN7581 Evaluation Board (DT) [ 55.969383] pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 55.976344] pc : 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 55.979851] lr : 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 55.983358] sp : ffffffc0850536a0 [ 55.986665] x29: ffffffc0850536a0 x28: 0000000000000024 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 55.993800] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffff8008b19000 x24: ffffff800222e800 [ 56.000935] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff8008b19000 [ 56.008071] x20: ffffff8002225800 x19: ffffff800379d000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 56.015206] x17: ffffffbf9ea59000 x16: ffffffc080018000 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 56.022342] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001 [ 56.029478] x11: ffffffc081471008 x10: ffffffc081575a98 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 56.036614] x8 : ffffffc08167fd40 x7 : ffffffc08069e104 x6 : ffffff8007f86000 [ 56.043748] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 [ 56.050884] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000250 x0 : ffffff800222c000 [ 56.058020] Call trace: [ 56.060459] 0xffffffc0798695a4 [ 56.063618] 0xffffffc079869a20 [ 56.066777] __qdisc_destroy+0x40/0xa0 [ 56.070528] qdisc_put+0x54/0x6c [ 56.073748] qdisc_graft+0x41c/0x648 [ 56.077324] tc_get_qdisc+0x168/0x2f8 [ 56.080978] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x230/0x330 [ 56.085076] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x128 [ 56.088913] rtnetlink_rcv+0x14/0x1c [ 56.092490] netlink_unicast+0x1e0/0x2c8 [ 56.096413] netlink_sendmsg+0x198/0x3c8 [ 56.100337] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1c4/0x274 [ 56.104261] ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xc0 [ 56.107924] __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x98 [ 56.111492] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x20/0x28 [ 56.115580] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x58/0xfc [ 56.120285] do_el0_svc+0x3c/0xbc [ 56.123592] el0_svc+0x18/0x4c [ 56.126647] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 [ 56.131005] el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 [ 56.134660] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0844Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250417Security Bulletin 17 April 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 April 2025, published on 17 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22059 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22059 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22061 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018025Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: ef1ca9271313b4ea7b03de69576aacef1e78f381 < d7f76197e49e46a8c082a6fededaa8a07e69a860, ef1ca9271313b4ea7b03de69576aacef1e78f381 < 57b290d97c6150774bf929117ca737a26d8fc33d, 6.14
Fixed
Linux: < 6.14, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11241
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11241↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-22061 · cve.blacktree.nl