BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-22035High confidence

tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.135-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-22035 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 48 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-22035
205 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching Kairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during ftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a 'mdelay(10)' after 'mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock)' in s_start(), and executing the following script: $ echo function_graph > current_tracer $ cat trace > /dev/null & $ sleep 5 # Ensure the 'cat' reaches the 'mdelay(10)' point $ echo timerlat > current_tracer The root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags within print_trace_line during each s_show(): * One through 'iter->trace->print_line()'; * Another through 'event->funcs->trace()', which is hidden in print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns. Tracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues to use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script above is print_graph_function_flags. Moreover, when switching from the 'function_graph' tracer to the 'timerlat' tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the 'function_graph' tracer to free 'iter->private', but does not set it to NULL. This provides an opportunity for 'event->funcs->trace()' to use an invalid 'iter->private'. To fix this issue, set 'iter->private' to NULL immediately after freeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer is not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary 'iter->private = NULL' during each 'cat trace' when using wakeup and irqsoff tracers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-11251

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching Kairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during ftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a 'mdelay(10)' after 'mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock)' in s_start(), and executing the following script: $ echo function_graph > current_tracer $ cat trace > /dev/null & $ sleep 5 # Ensure the 'cat' reaches the 'mdelay(10)' point $ echo timerlat > current_tracer The root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags within print_trace_line during each s_show(): * One through 'iter->trace->print_line()'; * Another through 'event->funcs->trace()', which is hidden in print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns. Tracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues to use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script above is print_graph_function_flags. Moreover, when switching from the 'function_graph' tracer to the 'timerlat' tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the 'function_graph' tracer to free 'iter->private', but does not set it to NULL. This provides an opportunity for 'event->funcs->trace()' to use an invalid 'iter->private'. To fix this issue, set 'iter->private' to NULL immediately after freeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer is not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary 'iter->private = NULL' during each 'cat trace' when using wakeup and irqsoff tracers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching Kairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during ftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a 'mdelay(10)' after 'mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock)' in s_start(), and executing the following script: $ echo function_graph > current_tracer $ cat trace > /dev/null & $ sleep 5 # Ensure the 'cat' reaches the 'mdelay(10)' point $ echo timerlat > current_tracer The root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags within print_trace_line during each s_show(): * One through 'iter->trace->print_line()'; * Another through 'event->funcs->trace()', which is hidden in print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns. Tracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues to use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script above is print_graph_function_flags. Moreover, when switching from the 'function_graph' tracer to the 'timerlat' tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the 'function_graph' tracer to free 'iter->private', but does not set it to NULL. This provides an opportunity for 'event->funcs->trace()' to use an invalid 'iter->private'. To fix this issue, set 'iter->private' to NULL immediately after freeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer is not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary 'iter->private = NULL' during each 'cat trace' when using wakeup and irqsoff tracers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching Kairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during ftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a 'mdelay(10)' after 'mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock)' in s_start(), and executing the following script: $ echo function_graph > current_tracer $ cat trace > /dev/null & $ sleep 5 # Ensure the 'cat' reaches the 'mdelay(10)' point $ echo timerlat > current_tracer The root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags within print_trace_line during each s_show(): * One through 'iter->trace->print_line()'; * Another through 'event->funcs->trace()', which is hidden in print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns. Tracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues to use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script above is print_graph_function_flags. Moreover, when switching from the 'function_graph' tracer to the 'timerlat' tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the 'function_graph' tracer to free 'iter->private', but does not set it to NULL. This provides an opportunity for 'event->funcs->trace()' to use an invalid 'iter->private'. To fix this issue, set 'iter->private' to NULL immediately after freeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer is not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary 'iter->private = NULL' during each 'cat trace' when using wakeup and irqsoff tracers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0844Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht genauer beschriebene Auswirkungen erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250430Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Apr 2020, published on 30 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250423Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Apr 2025, published on 23 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250417Security Bulletin 17 April 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 April 2025, published on 17 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0058Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1050Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1008Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0977Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0922Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21928 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0622Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21939 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0605Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21993 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22004 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22054 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22063 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-2312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21939 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21940 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21987 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22028 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22032 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22037 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-22010 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22014 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0368Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-46753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22044 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22049 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22049 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-004269Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.5, 5.4.292 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.236 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.134 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.87 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.23 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.11 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14.2 ≤ 6.14.*, 6.15 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-11251
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-22035 · cve.blacktree.nl