BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21970High confidence

net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.133-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-9350

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check When removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is triggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all the offloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returns false if one of PF is unloaded. In such case, mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead of the alive PF, and the flush is skipped. Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridge event handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can be ignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted, and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated. To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueue keeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridge notifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bond netdev which is already destroyed. To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked in commit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when adding bond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomes invalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? die+0x38/0x60 ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120 ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0 ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50 ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30 ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390 notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core] process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390 worker_thread+0x106/0x250 ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check When removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is triggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all the offloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returns false if one of PF is unloaded. In such case, mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead of the alive PF, and the flush is skipped. Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridge event handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can be ignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted, and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated. To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueue keeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridge notifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bond netdev which is already destroyed. To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked in commit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when adding bond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomes invalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? die+0x38/0x60 ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120 ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0 ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50 ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30 ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390 notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core] process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390 worker_thread+0x106/0x250 ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK>

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check When removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is triggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all the offloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returns false if one of PF is unloaded. In such case, mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead of the alive PF, and the flush is skipped. Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridge event handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can be ignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted, and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated. To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueue keeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridge notifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bond netdev which is already destroyed. To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked in commit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when adding bond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomes invalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? die+0x38/0x60 ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120 ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0 ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50 ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30 ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390 notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0 atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core] process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390 worker_thread+0x106/0x250 ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110 kthread+0xb7/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK>

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0683Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250402Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB], published on 2 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0892Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0622Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21941 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21991 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21992 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21996 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21977 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21973 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0333Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21975 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21980 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-018018Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < f90c4d6572488e2bad38cca00f1c59174a538a1a, ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < 86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1, ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4, ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25ca, ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < 5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7f, ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f < 4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbb, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.132 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.84 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.20 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.8 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-9350
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21970 · cve.blacktree.nl