BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21961High confidence

eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.47% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-9359

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case When mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from xdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in bnxt_xdp_build_skb(). bnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). The truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo->nr_frags but the skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before. So it stores sinfo->nr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it instead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(). Splat looks like: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff <0f> 0b e99 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x84/0x130 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0 ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900 ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70 ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210 ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130 How to reproduce: <Node A> ip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o ip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1 <Node B> ip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2 ping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000 Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be able to reproduce this issue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case When mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from xdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in bnxt_xdp_build_skb(). bnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). The truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo->nr_frags but the skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before. So it stores sinfo->nr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it instead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(). Splat looks like: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff <0f> 0b e99 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x84/0x130 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0 ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900 ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70 ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210 ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130 How to reproduce: <Node A> ip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o ip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1 <Node B> ip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2 ping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000 Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be able to reproduce this issue.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: bnxt: fix truesize for mb-xdp-pass case When mb-xdp is set and return is XDP_PASS, packet is converted from xdp_buff to sk_buff with xdp_update_skb_shared_info() in bnxt_xdp_build_skb(). bnxt_xdp_build_skb() passes incorrect truesize argument to xdp_update_skb_shared_info(). The truesize is calculated as BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE * sinfo->nr_frags but the skb_shared_info was wiped by napi_build_skb() before. So it stores sinfo->nr_frags before bnxt_xdp_build_skb() and use it instead of getting skb_shared_info from xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(). Splat looks like: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/core/skbuff.c:6072 skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Modules linked in: xt_nat xt_tcpudp veth af_packet xt_conntrack nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink xfrm_user xt_addrtype nft_coms CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2+ #3 RIP: 0010:skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 Code: 4b fd ff ff 49 8b 34 24 40 80 e6 40 0f 84 3d fd ff ff 49 8b 74 24 48 40 f6 c6 01 0f 84 2e fd ff ff 48 8d 4e ff e9 25 fd ff ff <0f> 0b e99 RSP: 0018:ffffb62c4120caa8 EFLAGS: 00010287 RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffffb62c4120cb14 RCX: 0000000000000ec0 RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: ffffa06e5d7dc000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: ffffa06e5d7ddec0 R08: ffffa06e6120a800 R09: ffffa06e7a119900 R10: 0000000000002310 R11: ffffa06e5d7dcec0 R12: ffffe4360575f740 R13: ffffe43600000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000000000002 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0755f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f147b76b0f8 CR3: 00000001615d4000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? __warn+0x84/0x130 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 ? report_bug+0x18a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? skb_try_coalesce+0x504/0x590 inet_frag_reasm_finish+0x11f/0x2e0 ip_defrag+0x37a/0x900 ip_local_deliver+0x51/0x120 ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x64/0x70 ip_sublist_rcv+0x179/0x210 ip_list_rcv+0xf9/0x130 How to reproduce: <Node A> ip link set $interface1 xdp obj xdp_pass.o ip link set $interface1 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev $interface1 <Node B> ip link set $interfac2 mtu 9000 up ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev $interface2 ping 10.0.0.1 -s 65000 Following ping.py patch adds xdp-mb-pass case. so ping.py is going to be able to reproduce this issue.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0683Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250402Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 02 Apr 2025 [1.46 MB], published on 2 April 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21916 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21921 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21939 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0892Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0859Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0843Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0828Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0561Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 juillet 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0465Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21941 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21943 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21950 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21957 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21960 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21968 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-004052Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 1dc4c557bfedfcdf7fc0c46795857773b7ad66e7 < 19107e71be330dbccb9f8f9f4cf0a9abeadad802, 1dc4c557bfedfcdf7fc0c46795857773b7ad66e7 < b4679807c6083ade4d47f03f80da891afcb6ef62, 1dc4c557bfedfcdf7fc0c46795857773b7ad66e7 < 9f7b2aa5034e24d3c49db73d5f760c0435fe31c2, 5.19
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.12.20 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.8 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-9359
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21961 · cve.blacktree.nl