BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21866High confidence

powerpc/code-patching: Fix KASAN hit by not flagging text patching area as VM_ALLOC

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.25% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.133-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.17-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-6283

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/code-patching: Fix KASAN hit by not flagging text patching area as VM_ALLOC Erhard reported the following KASAN hit while booting his PowerMac G4 with a KASAN-enabled kernel 6.13-rc6: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 Write of size 8 at addr f1000000 by task chronyd/1293 CPU: 0 UID: 123 PID: 1293 Comm: chronyd Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4 #2 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: PowerMac3,6 7455 0x80010303 PowerMac Call Trace: [c2437590] [c1631a84] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x8c (unreliable) [c24375b0] [c0504998] print_report+0xdc/0x504 [c2437610] [c050475c] kasan_report+0xf8/0x108 [c2437690] [c0505a3c] kasan_check_range+0x24/0x18c [c24376a0] [c03fb5e4] copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 [c24376c0] [c004c014] patch_instructions+0x15c/0x16c [c2437710] [c00731a8] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x60/0x7c [c2437730] [c0281168] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x50/0xac [c2437750] [c0073cf4] bpf_int_jit_compile+0xb30/0xdec [c2437880] [c0280394] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x15c/0x478 [c24378d0] [c1263428] bpf_prepare_filter+0xbf8/0xc14 [c2437990] [c12677ec] bpf_prog_create_from_user+0x258/0x2b4 [c24379d0] [c027111c] do_seccomp+0x3dc/0x1890 [c2437ac0] [c001d8e0] system_call_exception+0x2dc/0x420 [c2437f30] [c00281ac] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2c --- interrupt: c00 at 0x5a1274 NIP: 005a1274 LR: 006a3b3c CTR: 005296c8 REGS: c2437f40 TRAP: 0c00 Tainted: G W (6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4) MSR: 0200f932 <VEC,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24004422 XER: 00000000 GPR00: 00000166 af8f3fa0 a7ee3540 00000001 00000000 013b6500 005a5858 0200f932 GPR08: 00000000 00001fe9 013d5fc8 005296c8 2822244c 00b2fcd8 00000000 af8f4b57 GPR16: 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000002 GPR24: 00afdbb0 00000000 00000000 00000000 006e0004 013ce060 006e7c1c 00000001 NIP [005a1274] 0x5a1274 LR [006a3b3c] 0x6a3b3c --- interrupt: c00 The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [f1000000, f1002000) created by: text_area_cpu_up+0x20/0x190 The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x76e30 flags: 0x80000000(zone=2) raw: 80000000 00000000 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 raw: 00000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: f0ffff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0ffff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >f1000000: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ f1000080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f1000100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ================================================================== f8 corresponds to KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID which means the area is not initialised hence not supposed to be used yet. Powerpc text patching infrastructure allocates a virtual memory area using get_vm_area() and flags it as VM_ALLOC. But that flag is meant to be used for vmalloc() and vmalloc() allocated memory is not supposed to be used before a call to __vmalloc_node_range() which is never called for that area. That went undetected until commit e4137f08816b ("mm, kasan, kmsan: instrument copy_from/to_kernel_nofault") The area allocated by text_area_cpu_up() is not vmalloc memory, it is mapped directly on demand when needed by map_kernel_page(). There is no VM flag corresponding to such usage, so just pass no flag. That way the area will be unpoisonned and usable immediately.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/code-patching: Fix KASAN hit by not flagging text patching area as VM_ALLOC Erhard reported the following KASAN hit while booting his PowerMac G4 with a KASAN-enabled kernel 6.13-rc6: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 Write of size 8 at addr f1000000 by task chronyd/1293 CPU: 0 UID: 123 PID: 1293 Comm: chronyd Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4 #2 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: PowerMac3,6 7455 0x80010303 PowerMac Call Trace: [c2437590] [c1631a84] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x8c (unreliable) [c24375b0] [c0504998] print_report+0xdc/0x504 [c2437610] [c050475c] kasan_report+0xf8/0x108 [c2437690] [c0505a3c] kasan_check_range+0x24/0x18c [c24376a0] [c03fb5e4] copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 [c24376c0] [c004c014] patch_instructions+0x15c/0x16c [c2437710] [c00731a8] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x60/0x7c [c2437730] [c0281168] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x50/0xac [c2437750] [c0073cf4] bpf_int_jit_compile+0xb30/0xdec [c2437880] [c0280394] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x15c/0x478 [c24378d0] [c1263428] bpf_prepare_filter+0xbf8/0xc14 [c2437990] [c12677ec] bpf_prog_create_from_user+0x258/0x2b4 [c24379d0] [c027111c] do_seccomp+0x3dc/0x1890 [c2437ac0] [c001d8e0] system_call_exception+0x2dc/0x420 [c2437f30] [c00281ac] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2c --- interrupt: c00 at 0x5a1274 NIP: 005a1274 LR: 006a3b3c CTR: 005296c8 REGS: c2437f40 TRAP: 0c00 Tainted: G W (6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4) MSR: 0200f932 <VEC,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24004422 XER: 00000000 GPR00: 00000166 af8f3fa0 a7ee3540 00000001 00000000 013b6500 005a5858 0200f932 GPR08: 00000000 00001fe9 013d5fc8 005296c8 2822244c 00b2fcd8 00000000 af8f4b57 GPR16: 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000002 GPR24: 00afdbb0 00000000 00000000 00000000 006e0004 013ce060 006e7c1c 00000001 NIP [005a1274] 0x5a1274 LR [006a3b3c] 0x6a3b3c --- interrupt: c00 The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [f1000000, f1002000) created by: text_area_cpu_up+0x20/0x190 The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x76e30 flags: 0x80000000(zone=2) raw: 80000000 00000000 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 raw: 00000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: f0ffff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0ffff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >f1000000: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ f1000080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f1000100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ================================================================== f8 corresponds to KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID which means the area is not initialised hence not supposed to be used yet. Powerpc text patching infrastructure allocates a virtual memory area using get_vm_area() and flags it as VM_ALLOC. But that flag is meant to be used for vmalloc() and vmalloc() allocated memory is not supposed to be used before a call to __vmalloc_node_range() which is never called for that area. That went undetected until commit e4137f08816b ("mm, kasan, kmsan: instrument copy_from/to_kernel_nofault") The area allocated by text_area_cpu_up() is not vmalloc memory, it is mapped directly on demand when needed by map_kernel_page(). There is no VM flag corresponding to such usage, so just pass no flag. That way the area will be unpoisonned and usable immediately.

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/code-patching: Fix KASAN hit by not flagging text patching area as VM_ALLOC Erhard reported the following KASAN hit while booting his PowerMac G4 with a KASAN-enabled kernel 6.13-rc6: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 Write of size 8 at addr f1000000 by task chronyd/1293 CPU: 0 UID: 123 PID: 1293 Comm: chronyd Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4 #2 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: PowerMac3,6 7455 0x80010303 PowerMac Call Trace: [c2437590] [c1631a84] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x8c (unreliable) [c24375b0] [c0504998] print_report+0xdc/0x504 [c2437610] [c050475c] kasan_report+0xf8/0x108 [c2437690] [c0505a3c] kasan_check_range+0x24/0x18c [c24376a0] [c03fb5e4] copy_to_kernel_nofault+0xd8/0x1c8 [c24376c0] [c004c014] patch_instructions+0x15c/0x16c [c2437710] [c00731a8] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x60/0x7c [c2437730] [c0281168] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x50/0xac [c2437750] [c0073cf4] bpf_int_jit_compile+0xb30/0xdec [c2437880] [c0280394] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x15c/0x478 [c24378d0] [c1263428] bpf_prepare_filter+0xbf8/0xc14 [c2437990] [c12677ec] bpf_prog_create_from_user+0x258/0x2b4 [c24379d0] [c027111c] do_seccomp+0x3dc/0x1890 [c2437ac0] [c001d8e0] system_call_exception+0x2dc/0x420 [c2437f30] [c00281ac] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2c --- interrupt: c00 at 0x5a1274 NIP: 005a1274 LR: 006a3b3c CTR: 005296c8 REGS: c2437f40 TRAP: 0c00 Tainted: G W (6.13.0-rc6-PMacG4) MSR: 0200f932 <VEC,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24004422 XER: 00000000 GPR00: 00000166 af8f3fa0 a7ee3540 00000001 00000000 013b6500 005a5858 0200f932 GPR08: 00000000 00001fe9 013d5fc8 005296c8 2822244c 00b2fcd8 00000000 af8f4b57 GPR16: 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000002 GPR24: 00afdbb0 00000000 00000000 00000000 006e0004 013ce060 006e7c1c 00000001 NIP [005a1274] 0x5a1274 LR [006a3b3c] 0x6a3b3c --- interrupt: c00 The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [f1000000, f1002000) created by: text_area_cpu_up+0x20/0x190 The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x76e30 flags: 0x80000000(zone=2) raw: 80000000 00000000 00000122 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001 raw: 00000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: f0ffff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0ffff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >f1000000: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ f1000080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f1000100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ================================================================== f8 corresponds to KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID which means the area is not initialised hence not supposed to be used yet. Powerpc text patching infrastructure allocates a virtual memory area using get_vm_area() and flags it as VM_ALLOC. But that flag is meant to be used for vmalloc() and vmalloc() allocated memory is not supposed to be used before a call to __vmalloc_node_range() which is never called for that area. That went undetected until commit e4137f08816b ("mm, kasan, kmsan: instrument copy_from/to_kernel_nofault") The area allocated by text_area_cpu_up() is not vmalloc memory, it is mapped directly on demand when needed by map_kernel_page(). There is no VM flag corresponding to such usage, so just pass no flag. That way the area will be unpoisonned and usable immediately.

Why

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-770 ↗

CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling. The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-770
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0545Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen und um nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22027 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0721Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0605Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21898 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21904 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21909 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21910 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21893 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0333Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21862 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21877 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21878 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-002412Linux の Linux Kernel における制限またはスロットリング無しのリソースの割り当てに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、制限またはスロットリング無しのリソースの割り当てに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < 97de5852058a299ba447cd9782fe96488d30108b, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < f8d4c5b653c1bc0df56e15658bbf64fc359adc4e, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < 6847b3e40bb963e57b61d1cc6fe84cb37b9d3d4c, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < c905a3053518212a1017e50bd2be3bee59305bb0, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < 2d542f13d26344e3452eee77613026ce9b653065, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < 8d06e9208184b2851fa79a3a39d6860320c8bdf8, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < 2e6c80423f201405fd65254e52decd21663896f3, 37bc3e5fd764fb258ff4fcbb90b6d1b67fb466c1 < d262a192d38e527faa5984629aabda2e0d1c4f54, 4.13
Fixed
Linux: < 4.13, 5.4.291 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.235 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.130 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.80 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.17 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.5 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 12 Mar 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:08 UTC · CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-6283
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21866 · cve.blacktree.nl