BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21821High confidence

fbdev: omap: use threaded IRQ for LCD DMA

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.129-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.16-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-21821 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 54 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-21821
357 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: omap: use threaded IRQ for LCD DMA When using touchscreen and framebuffer, Nokia 770 crashes easily with: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/144-ads7846/82/0x00010000 Modules linked in: usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs omap_udc ohci_omap ohci_hcd CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 82 Comm: irq/144-ads7846 Not tainted 6.12.7-770 #2 Hardware name: Nokia 770 Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x5c dump_stack_lvl from __schedule_bug+0x50/0x70 __schedule_bug from __schedule+0x4d4/0x5bc __schedule from schedule+0x34/0xa0 schedule from schedule_preempt_disabled+0xc/0x10 schedule_preempt_disabled from __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x218/0x3b4 __mutex_lock.constprop.0 from clk_prepare_lock+0x38/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_set_rate+0x18/0x154 clk_set_rate from sossi_read_data+0x4c/0x168 sossi_read_data from hwa742_read_reg+0x5c/0x8c hwa742_read_reg from send_frame_handler+0xfc/0x300 send_frame_handler from process_pending_requests+0x74/0xd0 process_pending_requests from lcd_dma_irq_handler+0x50/0x74 lcd_dma_irq_handler from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x44/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu from handle_irq_event+0x28/0x68 handle_irq_event from handle_level_irq+0x9c/0x170 handle_level_irq from generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c generic_handle_domain_irq from omap1_handle_irq+0x40/0x8c omap1_handle_irq from generic_handle_arch_irq+0x28/0x3c generic_handle_arch_irq from call_with_stack+0x1c/0x24 call_with_stack from __irq_svc+0x94/0xa8 Exception stack(0xc5255da0 to 0xc5255de8) 5da0: 00000001 c22fc620 00000000 00000000 c08384a8 c106fc00 00000000 c240c248 5dc0: c113a600 c3f6ec30 00000001 00000000 c22fc620 c5255df0 c22fc620 c0279a94 5de0: 60000013 ffffffff __irq_svc from clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_get_rate+0x10/0x74 clk_get_rate from uwire_setup_transfer+0x40/0x180 uwire_setup_transfer from spi_bitbang_transfer_one+0x2c/0x9c spi_bitbang_transfer_one from spi_transfer_one_message+0x2d0/0x664 spi_transfer_one_message from __spi_pump_transfer_message+0x29c/0x498 __spi_pump_transfer_message from __spi_sync+0x1f8/0x2e8 __spi_sync from spi_sync+0x24/0x40 spi_sync from ads7846_halfd_read_state+0x5c/0x1c0 ads7846_halfd_read_state from ads7846_irq+0x58/0x348 ads7846_irq from irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread_fn from irq_thread+0x120/0x228 irq_thread from kthread+0xc8/0xe8 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 As a quick fix, switch to a threaded IRQ which provides a stable system.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5985

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: omap: use threaded IRQ for LCD DMA When using touchscreen and framebuffer, Nokia 770 crashes easily with: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/144-ads7846/82/0x00010000 Modules linked in: usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs omap_udc ohci_omap ohci_hcd CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 82 Comm: irq/144-ads7846 Not tainted 6.12.7-770 #2 Hardware name: Nokia 770 Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x5c dump_stack_lvl from __schedule_bug+0x50/0x70 __schedule_bug from __schedule+0x4d4/0x5bc __schedule from schedule+0x34/0xa0 schedule from schedule_preempt_disabled+0xc/0x10 schedule_preempt_disabled from __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x218/0x3b4 __mutex_lock.constprop.0 from clk_prepare_lock+0x38/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_set_rate+0x18/0x154 clk_set_rate from sossi_read_data+0x4c/0x168 sossi_read_data from hwa742_read_reg+0x5c/0x8c hwa742_read_reg from send_frame_handler+0xfc/0x300 send_frame_handler from process_pending_requests+0x74/0xd0 process_pending_requests from lcd_dma_irq_handler+0x50/0x74 lcd_dma_irq_handler from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x44/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu from handle_irq_event+0x28/0x68 handle_irq_event from handle_level_irq+0x9c/0x170 handle_level_irq from generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c generic_handle_domain_irq from omap1_handle_irq+0x40/0x8c omap1_handle_irq from generic_handle_arch_irq+0x28/0x3c generic_handle_arch_irq from call_with_stack+0x1c/0x24 call_with_stack from __irq_svc+0x94/0xa8 Exception stack(0xc5255da0 to 0xc5255de8) 5da0: 00000001 c22fc620 00000000 00000000 c08384a8 c106fc00 00000000 c240c248 5dc0: c113a600 c3f6ec30 00000001 00000000 c22fc620 c5255df0 c22fc620 c0279a94 5de0: 60000013 ffffffff __irq_svc from clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_get_rate+0x10/0x74 clk_get_rate from uwire_setup_transfer+0x40/0x180 uwire_setup_transfer from spi_bitbang_transfer_one+0x2c/0x9c spi_bitbang_transfer_one from spi_transfer_one_message+0x2d0/0x664 spi_transfer_one_message from __spi_pump_transfer_message+0x29c/0x498 __spi_pump_transfer_message from __spi_sync+0x1f8/0x2e8 __spi_sync from spi_sync+0x24/0x40 spi_sync from ads7846_halfd_read_state+0x5c/0x1c0 ads7846_halfd_read_state from ads7846_irq+0x58/0x348 ads7846_irq from irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread_fn from irq_thread+0x120/0x228 irq_thread from kthread+0xc8/0xe8 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 As a quick fix, switch to a threaded IRQ which provides a stable system.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: omap: use threaded IRQ for LCD DMA When using touchscreen and framebuffer, Nokia 770 crashes easily with: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/144-ads7846/82/0x00010000 Modules linked in: usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs omap_udc ohci_omap ohci_hcd CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 82 Comm: irq/144-ads7846 Not tainted 6.12.7-770 #2 Hardware name: Nokia 770 Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x5c dump_stack_lvl from __schedule_bug+0x50/0x70 __schedule_bug from __schedule+0x4d4/0x5bc __schedule from schedule+0x34/0xa0 schedule from schedule_preempt_disabled+0xc/0x10 schedule_preempt_disabled from __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x218/0x3b4 __mutex_lock.constprop.0 from clk_prepare_lock+0x38/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_set_rate+0x18/0x154 clk_set_rate from sossi_read_data+0x4c/0x168 sossi_read_data from hwa742_read_reg+0x5c/0x8c hwa742_read_reg from send_frame_handler+0xfc/0x300 send_frame_handler from process_pending_requests+0x74/0xd0 process_pending_requests from lcd_dma_irq_handler+0x50/0x74 lcd_dma_irq_handler from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x44/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu from handle_irq_event+0x28/0x68 handle_irq_event from handle_level_irq+0x9c/0x170 handle_level_irq from generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c generic_handle_domain_irq from omap1_handle_irq+0x40/0x8c omap1_handle_irq from generic_handle_arch_irq+0x28/0x3c generic_handle_arch_irq from call_with_stack+0x1c/0x24 call_with_stack from __irq_svc+0x94/0xa8 Exception stack(0xc5255da0 to 0xc5255de8) 5da0: 00000001 c22fc620 00000000 00000000 c08384a8 c106fc00 00000000 c240c248 5dc0: c113a600 c3f6ec30 00000001 00000000 c22fc620 c5255df0 c22fc620 c0279a94 5de0: 60000013 ffffffff __irq_svc from clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_get_rate+0x10/0x74 clk_get_rate from uwire_setup_transfer+0x40/0x180 uwire_setup_transfer from spi_bitbang_transfer_one+0x2c/0x9c spi_bitbang_transfer_one from spi_transfer_one_message+0x2d0/0x664 spi_transfer_one_message from __spi_pump_transfer_message+0x29c/0x498 __spi_pump_transfer_message from __spi_sync+0x1f8/0x2e8 __spi_sync from spi_sync+0x24/0x40 spi_sync from ads7846_halfd_read_state+0x5c/0x1c0 ads7846_halfd_read_state from ads7846_irq+0x58/0x348 ads7846_irq from irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread_fn from irq_thread+0x120/0x228 irq_thread from kthread+0xc8/0xe8 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 As a quick fix, switch to a threaded IRQ which provides a stable system.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: omap: use threaded IRQ for LCD DMA When using touchscreen and framebuffer, Nokia 770 crashes easily with: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/144-ads7846/82/0x00010000 Modules linked in: usb_f_ecm g_ether usb_f_rndis u_ether libcomposite configfs omap_udc ohci_omap ohci_hcd CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 82 Comm: irq/144-ads7846 Not tainted 6.12.7-770 #2 Hardware name: Nokia 770 Call trace: unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x5c dump_stack_lvl from __schedule_bug+0x50/0x70 __schedule_bug from __schedule+0x4d4/0x5bc __schedule from schedule+0x34/0xa0 schedule from schedule_preempt_disabled+0xc/0x10 schedule_preempt_disabled from __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x218/0x3b4 __mutex_lock.constprop.0 from clk_prepare_lock+0x38/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_set_rate+0x18/0x154 clk_set_rate from sossi_read_data+0x4c/0x168 sossi_read_data from hwa742_read_reg+0x5c/0x8c hwa742_read_reg from send_frame_handler+0xfc/0x300 send_frame_handler from process_pending_requests+0x74/0xd0 process_pending_requests from lcd_dma_irq_handler+0x50/0x74 lcd_dma_irq_handler from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x44/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu from handle_irq_event+0x28/0x68 handle_irq_event from handle_level_irq+0x9c/0x170 handle_level_irq from generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c generic_handle_domain_irq from omap1_handle_irq+0x40/0x8c omap1_handle_irq from generic_handle_arch_irq+0x28/0x3c generic_handle_arch_irq from call_with_stack+0x1c/0x24 call_with_stack from __irq_svc+0x94/0xa8 Exception stack(0xc5255da0 to 0xc5255de8) 5da0: 00000001 c22fc620 00000000 00000000 c08384a8 c106fc00 00000000 c240c248 5dc0: c113a600 c3f6ec30 00000001 00000000 c22fc620 c5255df0 c22fc620 c0279a94 5de0: 60000013 ffffffff __irq_svc from clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xe4 clk_prepare_lock from clk_get_rate+0x10/0x74 clk_get_rate from uwire_setup_transfer+0x40/0x180 uwire_setup_transfer from spi_bitbang_transfer_one+0x2c/0x9c spi_bitbang_transfer_one from spi_transfer_one_message+0x2d0/0x664 spi_transfer_one_message from __spi_pump_transfer_message+0x29c/0x498 __spi_pump_transfer_message from __spi_sync+0x1f8/0x2e8 __spi_sync from spi_sync+0x24/0x40 spi_sync from ads7846_halfd_read_state+0x5c/0x1c0 ads7846_halfd_read_state from ads7846_irq+0x58/0x348 ads7846_irq from irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x78 irq_thread_fn from irq_thread+0x120/0x228 irq_thread from kthread+0xc8/0xe8 kthread from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28 As a quick fix, switch to a threaded IRQ which provides a stable system.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0461Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0721Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21787 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21837 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21858 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21877 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0277Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-21799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 avril 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-017907Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.129 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.79 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.16 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.4 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:07 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5985
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21821 · cve.blacktree.nl