BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21820High confidence

tty: xilinx_uartps: split sysrq handling

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.129-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5974

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tty: xilinx_uartps: split sysrq handling lockdep detects the following circular locking dependency: CPU 0 CPU 1 ========================== ============================ cdns_uart_isr() printk() uart_port_lock(port) console_lock() cdns_uart_console_write() if (!port->sysrq) uart_port_lock(port) uart_handle_break() port->sysrq = ... uart_handle_sysrq_char() printk() console_lock() The fixed commit attempts to avoid this situation by only taking the port lock in cdns_uart_console_write if port->sysrq unset. However, if (as shown above) cdns_uart_console_write runs before port->sysrq is set, then it will try to take the port lock anyway. This may result in a deadlock. Fix this by splitting sysrq handling into two parts. We use the prepare helper under the port lock and defer handling until we release the lock.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tty: xilinx_uartps: split sysrq handling lockdep detects the following circular locking dependency: CPU 0 CPU 1 ========================== ============================ cdns_uart_isr() printk() uart_port_lock(port) console_lock() cdns_uart_console_write() if (!port->sysrq) uart_port_lock(port) uart_handle_break() port->sysrq = ... uart_handle_sysrq_char() printk() console_lock() The fixed commit attempts to avoid this situation by only taking the port lock in cdns_uart_console_write if port->sysrq unset. However, if (as shown above) cdns_uart_console_write runs before port->sysrq is set, then it will try to take the port lock anyway. This may result in a deadlock. Fix this by splitting sysrq handling into two parts. We use the prepare helper under the port lock and defer handling until we release the lock.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tty: xilinx_uartps: split sysrq handling lockdep detects the following circular locking dependency: CPU 0 CPU 1 ========================== ============================ cdns_uart_isr() printk() uart_port_lock(port) console_lock() cdns_uart_console_write() if (!port->sysrq) uart_port_lock(port) uart_handle_break() port->sysrq = ... uart_handle_sysrq_char() printk() console_lock() The fixed commit attempts to avoid this situation by only taking the port lock in cdns_uart_console_write if port->sysrq unset. However, if (as shown above) cdns_uart_console_write runs before port->sysrq is set, then it will try to take the port lock anyway. This may result in a deadlock. Fix this by splitting sysrq handling into two parts. We use the prepare helper under the port lock and defer handling until we release the lock.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0461Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21848 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21793 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0277Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-21796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21826 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21835 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 avril 2025 Version initial

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-002057Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < e22a97700901ba5e8bf8db68056a0d50f9440cae, 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < de5bd24197bd9ee37ec1e379a3d882bbd15c5065, 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < 8ea0e7b3d7b8f2f0fc9db491ff22a0abe120801c, 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < 9b88a7c4584ba67267a051069b8abe44fc9595b2, 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < 4410dba9807a17a93f649a9f5870ceaf30a675a3, 74ea66d4ca061a3cd4c0e924e51b60e924644852 < b06f388994500297bb91be60ffaf6825ecfd2afe, 4.6
Fixed
Linux: < 4.6, 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.129 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.78 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.14 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.3 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:07 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5974
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21820 · cve.blacktree.nl