BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21725High confidence

smb: client: fix oops due to unset link speed

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 127 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.39% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 127 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.129-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-21725 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: smb: client: fix oops due to unset link speed
108 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • bpftool as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-internal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Summary
A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's Server Message Block (SMB) client implementation, specifically within the Common Internet File System (CIFS) module. The issue arises when the client attempts to process network interface information provided by the server, particularly the LinkSpeed parameter. If the server omits this parameter or provides an unexpected value, the client may attempt to perform a division operation with a zero value, leading to a divide-by-zero error and subsequent kernel crash. This misconfiguration on the server could lead to system failure.
Remediation
Affected
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5220

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 127 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix oops due to unset link speed It isn't guaranteed that NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO::LinkSpeed will always be set by the server, so the client must handle any values and then prevent oopses like below from happening: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1323 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] Code: 00 00 48 89 df e8 3b cd 1b c1 41 f6 44 24 2c 04 0f 84 50 01 00 00 48 89 ef e8 e7 d0 1b c1 49 8b 44 24 18 31 d2 49 8d 7c 24 28 <48> f7 74 24 18 48 89 c3 e8 6e cf 1b c1 41 8b 6c 24 28 49 8d 7c 24 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001817be0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811230022c RCX: ffffffffc041bd99 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000567 RDI: ffff888112300228 RBP: ffff888112300218 R08: fffff52000302f5f R09: ffffed1022fa58ac R10: ffff888117d2c566 R11: 00000000fffffffe R12: ffff888112300200 R13: 000000012a15343f R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff888113f2db58 FS: 00007fe27119e740(0000) GS:ffff888148600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe2633c5000 CR3: 0000000124da0000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0x159/0x1b0 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? do_error_trap+0x90/0x130 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? exc_divide_error+0x39/0x50 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? asm_exc_divide_error+0x1a/0x20 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa39/0x1460 [cifs] ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? seq_read_iter+0x42e/0x790 seq_read_iter+0x19a/0x790 proc_reg_read_iter+0xbe/0x110 ? __pfx_proc_reg_read_iter+0x10/0x10 vfs_read+0x469/0x570 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x398/0x760 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x8a/0xa0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ksys_read+0xd3/0x170 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10 ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x50/0x270 ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe271288911 Code: 00 48 8b 15 01 25 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd e8 20 ad 01 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d b5 a7 10 00 00 74 13 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 4f c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec RSP: 002b:00007ffe87c079d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000040000 RCX: 00007fe271288911 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: 00007fe2633c6000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffe87c07a00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe2713e6380 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000040000 R13: 00007fe2633c6000 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Fix this by setting cifs_server_iface::speed to a sane value (1Gbps) by default when link speed is unset.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix oops due to unset link speed It isn't guaranteed that NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO::LinkSpeed will always be set by the server, so the client must handle any values and then prevent oopses like below from happening: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1323 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] Code: 00 00 48 89 df e8 3b cd 1b c1 41 f6 44 24 2c 04 0f 84 50 01 00 00 48 89 ef e8 e7 d0 1b c1 49 8b 44 24 18 31 d2 49 8d 7c 24 28 <48> f7 74 24 18 48 89 c3 e8 6e cf 1b c1 41 8b 6c 24 28 49 8d 7c 24 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001817be0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811230022c RCX: ffffffffc041bd99 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000567 RDI: ffff888112300228 RBP: ffff888112300218 R08: fffff52000302f5f R09: ffffed1022fa58ac R10: ffff888117d2c566 R11: 00000000fffffffe R12: ffff888112300200 R13: 000000012a15343f R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff888113f2db58 FS: 00007fe27119e740(0000) GS:ffff888148600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe2633c5000 CR3: 0000000124da0000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0x159/0x1b0 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? do_error_trap+0x90/0x130 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? exc_divide_error+0x39/0x50 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? asm_exc_divide_error+0x1a/0x20 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa39/0x1460 [cifs] ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? seq_read_iter+0x42e/0x790 seq_read_iter+0x19a/0x790 proc_reg_read_iter+0xbe/0x110 ? __pfx_proc_reg_read_iter+0x10/0x10 vfs_read+0x469/0x570 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x398/0x760 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x8a/0xa0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ksys_read+0xd3/0x170 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10 ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x50/0x270 ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe271288911 Code: 00 48 8b 15 01 25 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd e8 20 ad 01 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d b5 a7 10 00 00 74 13 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 4f c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec RSP: 002b:00007ffe87c079d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000040000 RCX: 00007fe271288911 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: 00007fe2633c6000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffe87c07a00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe2713e6380 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000040000 R13: 00007fe2633c6000 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Fix this by setting cifs_server_iface::speed to a sane value (1Gbps) by default when link speed is unset.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix oops due to unset link speed It isn't guaranteed that NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO::LinkSpeed will always be set by the server, so the client must handle any values and then prevent oopses like below from happening: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1323 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] Code: 00 00 48 89 df e8 3b cd 1b c1 41 f6 44 24 2c 04 0f 84 50 01 00 00 48 89 ef e8 e7 d0 1b c1 49 8b 44 24 18 31 d2 49 8d 7c 24 28 <48> f7 74 24 18 48 89 c3 e8 6e cf 1b c1 41 8b 6c 24 28 49 8d 7c 24 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001817be0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811230022c RCX: ffffffffc041bd99 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000567 RDI: ffff888112300228 RBP: ffff888112300218 R08: fffff52000302f5f R09: ffffed1022fa58ac R10: ffff888117d2c566 R11: 00000000fffffffe R12: ffff888112300200 R13: 000000012a15343f R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff888113f2db58 FS: 00007fe27119e740(0000) GS:ffff888148600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe2633c5000 CR3: 0000000124da0000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0x159/0x1b0 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? do_error_trap+0x90/0x130 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? exc_divide_error+0x39/0x50 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? asm_exc_divide_error+0x1a/0x20 ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa39/0x1460 [cifs] ? cifs_debug_data_proc_show+0xa45/0x1460 [cifs] ? seq_read_iter+0x42e/0x790 seq_read_iter+0x19a/0x790 proc_reg_read_iter+0xbe/0x110 ? __pfx_proc_reg_read_iter+0x10/0x10 vfs_read+0x469/0x570 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x398/0x760 ? __pfx_vfs_read+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x8a/0xa0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ksys_read+0xd3/0x170 ? __pfx_ksys_read+0x10/0x10 ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x50/0x270 ? mark_held_locks+0x1a/0x90 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fe271288911 Code: 00 48 8b 15 01 25 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd e8 20 ad 01 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d b5 a7 10 00 00 74 13 31 c0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 4f c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec RSP: 002b:00007ffe87c079d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000040000 RCX: 00007fe271288911 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: 00007fe2633c6000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffe87c07a00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe2713e6380 R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000040000 R13: 00007fe2633c6000 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Fix this by setting cifs_server_iface::speed to a sane value (1Gbps) by default when link speed is unset.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0453Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21694 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21807 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0277Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-21707 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802 Gestion détaillée du document le 21 mars 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-21692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21699 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-017353Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.7, 6.1.129 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.76 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.13 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.2 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Feb 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5220
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5220↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21725 · cve.blacktree.nl