BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21647High confidence

sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-265688 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.3HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.28% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

22 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 18 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.128-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-503939 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-503939: Vulnerabilities in the BIOS of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - BIOS
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Remediation
Only build and run applications from trusted sources
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-2596

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access. To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error). As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access. To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error). As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access. To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error). As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2253IBM Security Verify Access: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Security Verify Access ausnutzen, um erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, sensible Informationen offenzulegen und andere, nicht näher bezeichnete Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250122Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025, published on 22 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0168Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2022-50673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50865 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53833 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38024 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22036 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39993 Gestion détaillée du document le 30 janvier 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21663 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21671 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0605Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-58058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58069 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21719 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21719 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21722 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21722 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

ord?id=CVE-2024-58086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58092 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21666 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21669 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-58058 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58069 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58071 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21708 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21711 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21711 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21715 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21642 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21644 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21652 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21654 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21666 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21669 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-57951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21655 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21660 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21662 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21664 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0183Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21684 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21684 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21687 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21688 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21688 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21689 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21690 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0134Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21655 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21655 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21660 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21662 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21664 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-015160Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Fixed
Linux: < 6.11, 5.4.291 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.235 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.125 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.72 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.10 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 19 Jan 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-2596
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21647 · cve.blacktree.nl