BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-21629High confidence

net: reenable NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM offload for BIG TCP packets

Linux · Linux

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.43% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 3 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.124-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-2578

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: reenable NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM offload for BIG TCP packets The blamed commit disabled hardware offoad of IPv6 packets with extension headers on devices that advertise NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM, based on the definition of that feature in skbuff.h: * * - %NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM * - Driver (device) is only able to checksum plain * TCP or UDP packets over IPv6. These are specifically * unencapsulated packets of the form IPv6|TCP or * IPv6|UDP where the Next Header field in the IPv6 * header is either TCP or UDP. IPv6 extension headers * are not supported with this feature. This feature * cannot be set in features for a device with * NETIF_F_HW_CSUM also set. This feature is being * DEPRECATED (see below). The change causes skb_warn_bad_offload to fire for BIG TCP packets. [ 496.310233] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 23472 at net/core/dev.c:3129 skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310297] ? skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310300] skb_checksum_help+0x129/0x1f0 [ 496.310303] skb_csum_hwoffload_help+0x150/0x1b0 [ 496.310306] validate_xmit_skb+0x159/0x270 [ 496.310309] validate_xmit_skb_list+0x41/0x70 [ 496.310312] sch_direct_xmit+0x5c/0x250 [ 496.310317] __qdisc_run+0x388/0x620 BIG TCP introduced an IPV6_TLV_JUMBO IPv6 extension header to communicate packet length, as this is an IPv6 jumbogram. But, the feature is only enabled on devices that support BIG TCP TSO. The header is only present for PF_PACKET taps like tcpdump, and not transmitted by physical devices. For this specific case of extension headers that are not transmitted, return to the situation before the blamed commit and support hardware offload. ipv6_has_hopopt_jumbo() tests not only whether this header is present, but also that it is the only extension header before a terminal (L4) header.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: reenable NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM offload for BIG TCP packets The blamed commit disabled hardware offoad of IPv6 packets with extension headers on devices that advertise NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM, based on the definition of that feature in skbuff.h: * * - %NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM * - Driver (device) is only able to checksum plain * TCP or UDP packets over IPv6. These are specifically * unencapsulated packets of the form IPv6|TCP or * IPv6|UDP where the Next Header field in the IPv6 * header is either TCP or UDP. IPv6 extension headers * are not supported with this feature. This feature * cannot be set in features for a device with * NETIF_F_HW_CSUM also set. This feature is being * DEPRECATED (see below). The change causes skb_warn_bad_offload to fire for BIG TCP packets. [ 496.310233] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 23472 at net/core/dev.c:3129 skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310297] ? skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310300] skb_checksum_help+0x129/0x1f0 [ 496.310303] skb_csum_hwoffload_help+0x150/0x1b0 [ 496.310306] validate_xmit_skb+0x159/0x270 [ 496.310309] validate_xmit_skb_list+0x41/0x70 [ 496.310312] sch_direct_xmit+0x5c/0x250 [ 496.310317] __qdisc_run+0x388/0x620 BIG TCP introduced an IPV6_TLV_JUMBO IPv6 extension header to communicate packet length, as this is an IPv6 jumbogram. But, the feature is only enabled on devices that support BIG TCP TSO. The header is only present for PF_PACKET taps like tcpdump, and not transmitted by physical devices. For this specific case of extension headers that are not transmitted, return to the situation before the blamed commit and support hardware offload. ipv6_has_hopopt_jumbo() tests not only whether this header is present, but also that it is the only extension header before a terminal (L4) header.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: reenable NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM offload for BIG TCP packets The blamed commit disabled hardware offoad of IPv6 packets with extension headers on devices that advertise NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM, based on the definition of that feature in skbuff.h: * * - %NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM * - Driver (device) is only able to checksum plain * TCP or UDP packets over IPv6. These are specifically * unencapsulated packets of the form IPv6|TCP or * IPv6|UDP where the Next Header field in the IPv6 * header is either TCP or UDP. IPv6 extension headers * are not supported with this feature. This feature * cannot be set in features for a device with * NETIF_F_HW_CSUM also set. This feature is being * DEPRECATED (see below). The change causes skb_warn_bad_offload to fire for BIG TCP packets. [ 496.310233] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 23472 at net/core/dev.c:3129 skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310297] ? skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc4/0xe0 [ 496.310300] skb_checksum_help+0x129/0x1f0 [ 496.310303] skb_csum_hwoffload_help+0x150/0x1b0 [ 496.310306] validate_xmit_skb+0x159/0x270 [ 496.310309] validate_xmit_skb_list+0x41/0x70 [ 496.310312] sch_direct_xmit+0x5c/0x250 [ 496.310317] __qdisc_run+0x388/0x620 BIG TCP introduced an IPV6_TLV_JUMBO IPv6 extension header to communicate packet length, as this is an IPv6 jumbogram. But, the feature is only enabled on devices that support BIG TCP TSO. The header is only present for PF_PACKET taps like tcpdump, and not transmitted by physical devices. For this specific case of extension headers that are not transmitted, return to the situation before the blamed commit and support hardware offload. ipv6_has_hopopt_jumbo() tests not only whether this header is present, but also that it is the only extension header before a terminal (L4) header.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0105Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250122Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025, published on 22 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-14178 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rd?id=CVE-2025-1376 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0899Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2025-39985 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39987 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39990 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39994 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39998 du 16 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-49124 du 17 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-49133 du 17 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-49568 du 17 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-53687 du 17 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-56709 du 17 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-21629 du 18 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-21645 du 18 octobre 2025 Une gestion de version détaillée se trouve à la fin de ce document. Risques Atteinte à la confidentialité des données Contournement de la politique de sécurité Déni de service Exécution de code arbitraire à distance Non spécifié par l'éditeur Systèmes affectés azl3 binutils 2.41-7 azl3 kernel 6.6.104.2-1 azl3 kernel 6.6.96.2-2 azl3 openssh 9.8p1-4 azl3 python3 3.12.9-4 versions antérieures à 3.12.9-5 azl3 pytorch 2.2.2-7 azl3 qemu 8.2.0-19 azl3 qtsvg 6.6.1-2 versions antérieures à 6.6.1-3 azl3 ruby 3.3.5-5 azl3 rubygem-elasticsearch 8.9.0-1 azl3 valkey 8.0.4-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56699 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-58004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-58004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21713 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21696 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

ord?id=CVE-2024-57935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0927 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21633 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-57930 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-016866Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a84978a9cda68f0afe3f01d476c68db21526baf1 < ac9cfef69565021c9e1022a493a9c40b03e2caf9, c69bc67c1cb211aa390bea6e512bb01b1241fefb < 95ccf006bbc8b59044313b8c309dcf29c546abd4, 04c20a9356f283da623903e81e7c6d5df7e4dc3c < d3b7a9c7597b779039a51d7b34116fbe424bf2b7, 04c20a9356f283da623903e81e7c6d5df7e4dc3c < 68e068cabd2c6c533ef934c2e5151609cf6ecc6d, bcefc3cd7f592a70fcbbbfd7ad1fbc69172ea78b, 477b35d94a21530046fe91589960732fcf2b29ed, a27a5c40ee4cbe00294e2c76160de5f2589061ba, 9f605135a5c0fe614c2b15197b9ced1e217eca59, 705350fbd6ed4b5d89ee045fa57a0594a72b17d7, 6.1.116 < 6.1.124, 6.6.60 < 6.6.70, 4.19.323 < 4.20, 5.4.285 < 5.5, 5.10.229 < 5.11, 5.15.171 < 5.16, 6.11.7 < 6.12, 6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 6.12, 6.1.124 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.70 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.9 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Jan 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-2578
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-21629 · cve.blacktree.nl