BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-1416High confidence

Password disclosure in Proget MDM

Proget · Proget

7.0HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Proget Proget and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-16000

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

In Proget MDM, a low-privileged user can retrieve passwords for managed devices and subsequently use functionalities restricted by the MDM (Mobile Device Management). For it to happen, they must know the UUIDs of targetted devices, which might be obtained by exploiting CVE-2025-1415 or CVE-2025-1417. This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite).

What

In Proget MDM, a low-privileged user can retrieve passwords for managed devices and subsequently use functionalities restricted by the MDM (Mobile Device Management). For it to happen, they must know the UUIDs of targetted devices, which might be obtained by exploiting CVE-2025-1415 or CVE-2025-1417. This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite).

Why

The application performs an authorisation check, but it does not correctly enforce the required permission boundary.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In Proget MDM, a low-privileged user can retrieve passwords for managed devices and subsequently use functionalities restricted by the MDM (Mobile Device Management). For it to happen, they must know the UUIDs of targetted devices, which might be obtained by exploiting CVE-2025-1415 or CVE-2025-1417. This issue has been fixed in 2.17.5 version of Konsola Proget (server part of the MDM suite).

Why

The application performs an authorisation check, but it does not correctly enforce the required permission boundary.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Incorrect Authorization → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-863 ↗

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization. The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCHighVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCHighSubsequent-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SIHighSubsequent-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
CWE-863
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250528Security Bulletin 28 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 28 May 2025, published on 28 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT Polska · Polish · CVE-2025-1415CERT Polska w social mediach

CERT Polska otrzymał zgłoszenie o podatnościach w oprogramowaniu Konsola Proget (część serwerowa pakietu MDM) i koordynował proces ujawniania informacji. Podatność CVE-2025-1415 : Użytkownik z niskimi uprawnieniami może uzyskać informacje o zadaniach wykonywanych na urządzeniach zarządzanych przez Proget MDM, a także szczegóły dotyczące tych urządzeń, takie jak ich UUID, które są niezbędne do wykorzystania podatności CVE-2025-1416 . Aby przeprowadzić atak, konieczna jest znajomość task_id , jednak ponieważ są to zazwyczaj niskie liczby całkowite i nie ma limitu zapytań kierowanych do podatnego endpointu, task_id może zostać łatwo odgadnięte metodą brute force. Podatność CVE-2025-1416 : Użytkownik z niskimi uprawnieniami może pobrać hasła do zarządzanych urządzeń i następnie korzystać z funkcji ograniczonych przez MDM. Aby to było możliwe, musi znać UUID docelowych urządzeń, które mogą zostać pozyskane przez wykorzystanie CVE-2025-1415 lub CVE-2025-1417 . Podatność CVE-2025-1417 : Użytkownik z niskimi uprawnieniami może uzyskać dostęp do informacji o zmianach zawartych w kopiach zapasowych wszystkich urządzeń zarządzanych przez MDM. Informacje te obejmują identyfikatory użytkowników, adresy e-mail, imiona, nazwiska oraz UUID urządzeń. Te ostatnie mogą zostać wykorzystane do eksploatacji CVE-2025-1416 . Skuteczne wykorzystanie podatności wymaga znajomości UUID konkretnej kopii zapasowej, który nie może zostać odgadnięty metodą brute force. Podatność CVE-2025-1418 : Użytkownik z niskimi uprawnieniami może uzyskać dostęp do informacji o profilach utworzonych w Proget MDM, które zawierają dane dotyczące dozwolonych oraz niedozwolonych funkcji. Profile nie ujawniają żadnych wrażliwych informacji (w tym ich wykorzystania na podłączonych urządzeniach). Podatność CVE-2025-1419 : Dane wprowadzane w sekcji komentarzy Konsoli Proget nie są poprawnie oczyszczane, co pozwala użytkownikowi z wysokimi uprawnieniami przeprowadzić atak Stored Cross-Site Scripting. Podatność CVE-2025-1420 : Dane wprowadzane w polu zawierającym activationMessage w Konsoli Proget nie są poprawnie oczyszczane, co pozwala użytkownikowi z wysokimi uprawnieniami przeprowadzić atak Stored Cross-Site Scripting. Podatność CVE-2025-1421 : Dane przesyłane w żądaniu do serwera podczas aktywacji nowego urządzenia są zapisywane w bazie danych. Inni użytkownicy z wysokimi uprawnieniami mogą pobrać te dane jako plik CSV i narazić swój komputer na infekcję po jego otwarciu w narzędziu takim jak Microsoft Excel. Atakujący może w ten sposób uzyskać zdalny dostęp do komputera ofiary. Wszystkie wymienione podatności zostały naprawione w wersji 2.17.5 oprogramowania Proget.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Proget: < 2.17.5
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 May 2025 · Last source change 21 May 2025, 13:31 UTC · CWE-863 · Incorrect Authorization

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-16000
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-16000↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-1416 · cve.blacktree.nl