BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-13601High confidence

Glib: integer overflow in in g_escape_uri_string()

Unknown · Unknown

Official source articles: Red Hat RHSA-2026:0936 ↗ · Red Hat RHSA-2026:0975 ↗ · Red Hat RHSA-2026:0991 ↗ · Red Hat RHSA-2026:1323 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.7HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 0.32% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceglib2.0Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.84.4-3~deb13u2Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceglib2.0Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.74.6-2+deb12u8Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceglib2.0Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.86.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceglib2.0Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.86.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveglib2.0Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.2.80.0-6ubuntu3.6Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2025-13601 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityglib: Integer overflow in in g_escape_uri_string()
11 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • glib2-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • glib2-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • mingw-glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • mingw32-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • mingw32-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • mingw64-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • mingw64-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
SSA-253495 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-253495: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC OS before V4.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.
Remediation
Update to V4.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-199720

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.7 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

What

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

Why

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
local access → Integer Overflow or Wraparound → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-190 ↗

CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound. The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-190Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-199720Official EUVD mapping

A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0778Dell Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0544IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen, Daten zu manipulieren oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, darunter potenzielle Codeausführung oder Speicherbeschädigung.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1730Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1210Oracle Siebel CRM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Siebel CRM ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0187Red Hat Enterprise Linux (glib): Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in der glib Bibliothek von Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251203Security Bulletin 03 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 03 Dec 2025, published on 3 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0450Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

du 15 avril 2026 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0405 Bulletin de sécurité Splunk SVD-2026-0406 du 15 avril 2026 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0406 Bulletin de sécurité Splunk SVD-2026-0407 du 15 avril 2026 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0407 Bulletin de sécurité Splunk SVD-2026-0408 du 15 avril 2026 https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0281Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

d?id=CVE-2025-13033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0224Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

/7261794 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7261887 du 25 février 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7261887 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7261890 du 25 février 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7261890 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7261935 du 26 février 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7261935 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7261959 du 26 février 2026 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7261959 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-29371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29371 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14847 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39993 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2025-12084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12383 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1377 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0209Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2024-56538 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0199Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-10543 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11468 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0112Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rd?id=CVE-2025-0913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11413 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11413 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11414 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11414 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11494 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21855 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

0211 du 22 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64505 du 26 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64506 du 27 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64720 du 27 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-65018 du 27 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-38656 du 28 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12816 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12969 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12970 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12977 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13601 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64704 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64713 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66030 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66031 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66382 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58436 du 30 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61915 du 30 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12638 du 03 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66221 du 03 décembre 2025 Une gestion de version détaillée se

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025896GNOME Project等の複数ベンダの製品における整数オーバーフローの脆弱性

glibのg_escape_uri_string()関数において、バッファサイズの誤った計算によりヒープベースのバッファオーバーフローの問題が発見されました。エスケープ対象の文字列に非常に多くの不正な文字（エスケープが必要な文字）が含まれている場合、エスケープ後の文字列の長さの計算がオーバーフローし、新しく割り当てられた文字列の末尾に書き込みが発生する可能性があります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Nov 2025 · Last source change 31 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC · CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-199720
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; mingw-glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw32-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw32-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw64-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw64-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 · Fixed: glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-doc-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); and 816 more
    After
    glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; mingw-glib2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw32-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw32-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw64-glib2 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; mingw64-glib2-static as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 · Fixed: glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-devel-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-debuginfo-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); glib2-doc-0:2.56.1-11.el7_9.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS); and 816 more
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    < 2.86.3 · Fixed: 0:2.80.4-10.el10_1.12 < *; 0:2.87.0-1.el10 < *; 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.8 < *; 0:2.56.1-11.el7_9 < *; 0:2.56.4-168.el8_10 < *; 0:2.56.4-8.el8_2.4 < *; 0:2.56.4-10.el8_4.4 < *
    After
    < 2.86.3 · Fixed: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10: 0:2.80.4-10.el10_1.12 < *, 0:2.87.0-1.el10 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support: 0:2.80.4-4.el10_0.8 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support: 0:2.56.1-11.el7_9 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8: 0:2.56.4-168.el8_10 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support: 0:2.56.4-8.el8_2.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support: 0:2.56.4-10.el8_4.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On: 0:2.56.4-10.el8_4.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support: 0:2.56.4-158.el8_6.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service: 0:2.56.4-158.el8_6.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions: 0:2.56.4-158.el8_6.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service: 0:2.56.4-164.el8_8 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions: 0:2.56.4-164.el8_8 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9: 0:2.68.4-18.el9_7.1 < *, 0:2.78.6-3.el9 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions: 0:2.68.4-5.el9_0.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions: 0:2.68.4-7.el9_2.4 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support: 0:2.68.4-14.el9_4.5 < *; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support: 0:2.68.4-16.el9_6.4 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12: 412.86.202602021310-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13: 413.92.202602240113-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14: 414.92.202602171627-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15: 415.92.202603101737-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16: 416.94.202602101357-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17: 417.94.202602090846-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18: 418.94.202602022246-0 < *; Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19: 4.19.9.6.202602112047-0 < *; Red Hat Ceph Storage 8: 1769512383 < *; Red Hat Discovery 2: 1769104765 < *, 1769111774 < *; Red Hat Hardened Images: 2.88.0-1.1.hum1 < *; Red Hat Insights proxy 1.5: 1770740405 < *; Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5: 1770808689 < *, 1770807477 < *, 1770646925 < *, 1770808765 < *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-199720↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference · Red Hat RHSA-2026:0936↗Vendor advisory · Red Hat RHSA-2026:0975↗Vendor advisory · Red Hat RHSA-2026:0991↗Vendor advisory · Red Hat RHSA-2026:1323↗Public exploit reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-13601 · cve.blacktree.nl