BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-13227High confidence

Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page

Google · Chrome

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.25% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Google Chrome and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcechromiumVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.142.0.7444.59-1~deb13u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcechromiumVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.142.0.7444.59-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcechromiumVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.142.0.7444.59-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcechromiumVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.142.0.7444.59-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-197887

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

What

Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-843 ↗

CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'). The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-843
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2445Google Chrome/Microsoft Edge: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Google Chrome/Microsoft Edge ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise um beliebigen Code auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder Spoofing- oder Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251119Security Bulletin 19 Nov 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 19 Nov 2025, published on 19 November 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0281Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

d?id=CVE-2025-12728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13033 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13042 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

tre Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft Date de la première version 04 décembre 2025 Date de la dernière version 04 décembre 2025 Source(s) Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-10158 du 19 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64324 du 20 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2022-50233 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11230 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11731 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13193 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13226 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13227 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13230 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-54770 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-54771 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61661 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61662 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61663 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61664 du 21 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40210 du 22 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-40211 du 22 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-019597Google の Google Chrome における型の取り違えに関する脆弱性

Google の Google Chrome には、型の取り違えに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6641MS 12월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

드에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13633 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13633 디지털 자격 증명에서 UaF(Use after free) | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13632 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13632 DevTools에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13631 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13631 Google Updater에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13630 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13630 V8에서 유형 혼란 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-13230 | Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | | Mariner | CVE-2025-13227 | Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | | Mariner | CVE-2025-13226 | Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13224 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13224 Type Confusion in V8 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-13223 | Chromium: CVE-2025-13223 Type Confusion in V8 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-13193 | Libvirt: in

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Chrome: 142.0.7444.59 < 142.0.7444.59
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 Nov 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 16:56 UTC · CWE-843 · Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-197887
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-13227 · cve.blacktree.nl