BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-1180High confidence

GNU Binutils ld elf-eh-frame.c _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame memory corruption

GNU · Binutils

2.3LowCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Low technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivebinutilsVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.2.42-4ubuntu2.5Canonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-2054

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Low technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43. This affects the function _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

What

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43. This affects the function _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43. This affects the function _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component ld. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Passive interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-119

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIPassiveUser interaction: A user must unknowingly interact with the vulnerable system.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-119Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1730Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0304binutils: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in binutils ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250213Security Bulletin 13 February 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 February 2025, published on 13 February 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

e.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11495 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1178 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1179 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11839 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11966 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-005436GNU Project の GNU Binutils におけるバッファエラーの脆弱性

GNU Project の GNU Binutils には、バッファエラーの脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Binutils: 2.43
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 Feb 2025, 14:55 UTC · CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-2054
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-1180 · cve.blacktree.nl