BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-0395High confidence

The GNU C Library glibc — Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size

The GNU C Library · glibc

Official source article: Siemens SSA-577017 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.2MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 0.36% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs The GNU C Library glibc and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.40-6Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.36-9+deb12u10Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.40-6Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceglibcVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.40-6Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveglibcVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.2.39-0ubuntu8.4Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2025-0395 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 68 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-0395
268 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • glibc as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-32bit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-devel-32bit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-html as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-i18ndata as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-info as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-locale as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-locale-32bit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-profile as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • glibc-profile-32bit as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • nscd as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
Summary
When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-577017 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-577017: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ruggedcom Rox Before 2.17.1
11 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536
  • RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000
Summary
When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.
Remediation
Update to V2.17.1 or later version
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-1642

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 16 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.

What

When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.

Why

The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

When the assert() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 fails, it does not allocate enough space for the assertion failure message string and size information, which may lead to a buffer overflow if the message string size aligns to page size.

Why

The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.

Likely attack path
local access → Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-131 ↗

CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size. The product does not correctly calculate the size to be used when allocating a buffer, which could lead to a buffer overflow.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-131Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1559Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1365IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen, um beliebige Befehle auszuführen und um nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0172GNU libc: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in GNU libc ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250129Security Bulletin 29 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 29 Jan 2025, published on 29 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7264 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8244 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0665 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0840 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-109

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8508 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0306 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0838 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-10911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535 Référence CVE CVE-2024-5642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21492 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21494 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21497 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0434 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0435 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0438 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0439 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0440 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0441 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

ERecord?id=CVE-2024-43802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45306 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47814 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52533 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52533 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57360 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1371 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0530Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2024-12088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-12747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12747 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40906 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7254 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-24528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24528 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-31651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-33121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36050 Référence CVE CVE-2025-46701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0524Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

e.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56827 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6716 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6716 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7348 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-9287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-1390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21490 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21491 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21491 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21497 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21500 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-202

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0147Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens-producten

Multiple vulnerabilities including a buffer overflow in glibc's assert() function (CVE-2025-0395) affect GNU C Library versions 2.13 to 2.40 and various products like NetApp, Oracle Communications, and HPE Brocade, leading to potential DoS, data modification, and unauthorized access.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0246Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: * Denial-of-Service (DoS) * Cross-Site Scripting * Manipulatie van gegevens * Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel * (Remote) code execution (SYSTEM rechten) * (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) * Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens * Verhogen van rechten De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V2.17.1 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Jan 2025 · Last source change 12 May 2026, 12:02 UTC · CWE-131 · Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-1642
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2.13 ≤ 2.40 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    2.13 ≤ 2.40 · Fixed: Update to V2.17.1 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-1642↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗Siemens ProductCERT security advisory · Siemens SSA-577017↗CISA Vulnrichment SSVC evidence↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-0395 · cve.blacktree.nl