BlackTreeIndependent security intelligenceSAP SE · SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.
Patch availableSAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform does not check for authorization when a user executes some RFC function modules. This could lead to an attacker with basic user privileges to gain control over the data in Informix database, leading to complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability.
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform does not check for authorization when a user executes some RFC function modules. This could lead to an attacker with basic user privileges to gain control over the data in Informix database, leading to complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability.
Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP and ABAP Platform does not check for authorization when a user executes some RFC function modules. This could lead to an attacker with basic user privileges to gain control over the data in Informix database, leading to complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability.
Attacker-controlled data is not kept separate from SQL query syntax, allowing the intended database operation to be changed.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection'). The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 14 Jan 2025 · Last source change 14 Jan 2025, 14:51 UTC · CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.