BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-58238High confidence

Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Resolve TX timeout error in power save stress test

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 18 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 18 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

22 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 18 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.9.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.8Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-54861

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 18 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Resolve TX timeout error in power save stress test This fixes the tx timeout issue seen while running a stress test on btnxpuart for couple of hours, such that the interval between two HCI commands coincide with the power save timeout value of 2 seconds. Test procedure using bash script: <load btnxpuart.ko> hciconfig hci0 up //Enable Power Save feature hcitool -i hci0 cmd 3f 23 02 00 00 while (true) do hciconfig hci0 leadv sleep 2 hciconfig hci0 noleadv sleep 2 done Error log, after adding few more debug prints: Bluetooth: btnxpuart_queue_skb(): 01 0A 20 01 00 Bluetooth: hci0: Set UART break: on, status=0 Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() tx_work scheduled Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_work() dequeue: 01 0A 20 01 00 Can't set advertise mode on hci0: Connection timed out (110) Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x200a tx timeout When the power save mechanism turns on UART break, and btnxpuart_tx_work() is scheduled simultaneously, psdata->ps_state is read as PS_STATE_AWAKE, which prevents the psdata->work from being scheduled, which is responsible to turn OFF UART break. This issue is fixed by adding a ps_lock mutex around UART break on/off as well as around ps_state read/write. btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() will now read updated ps_state value. If ps_state is PS_STATE_SLEEP, it will first schedule psdata->work, and then it will reschedule itself once UART break has been turned off and ps_state is PS_STATE_AWAKE. Tested above script for 50,000 iterations and TX timeout error was not observed anymore.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Resolve TX timeout error in power save stress test This fixes the tx timeout issue seen while running a stress test on btnxpuart for couple of hours, such that the interval between two HCI commands coincide with the power save timeout value of 2 seconds. Test procedure using bash script: <load btnxpuart.ko> hciconfig hci0 up //Enable Power Save feature hcitool -i hci0 cmd 3f 23 02 00 00 while (true) do hciconfig hci0 leadv sleep 2 hciconfig hci0 noleadv sleep 2 done Error log, after adding few more debug prints: Bluetooth: btnxpuart_queue_skb(): 01 0A 20 01 00 Bluetooth: hci0: Set UART break: on, status=0 Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() tx_work scheduled Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_work() dequeue: 01 0A 20 01 00 Can't set advertise mode on hci0: Connection timed out (110) Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x200a tx timeout When the power save mechanism turns on UART break, and btnxpuart_tx_work() is scheduled simultaneously, psdata->ps_state is read as PS_STATE_AWAKE, which prevents the psdata->work from being scheduled, which is responsible to turn OFF UART break. This issue is fixed by adding a ps_lock mutex around UART break on/off as well as around ps_state read/write. btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() will now read updated ps_state value. If ps_state is PS_STATE_SLEEP, it will first schedule psdata->work, and then it will reschedule itself once UART break has been turned off and ps_state is PS_STATE_AWAKE. Tested above script for 50,000 iterations and TX timeout error was not observed anymore.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btnxpuart: Resolve TX timeout error in power save stress test This fixes the tx timeout issue seen while running a stress test on btnxpuart for couple of hours, such that the interval between two HCI commands coincide with the power save timeout value of 2 seconds. Test procedure using bash script: <load btnxpuart.ko> hciconfig hci0 up //Enable Power Save feature hcitool -i hci0 cmd 3f 23 02 00 00 while (true) do hciconfig hci0 leadv sleep 2 hciconfig hci0 noleadv sleep 2 done Error log, after adding few more debug prints: Bluetooth: btnxpuart_queue_skb(): 01 0A 20 01 00 Bluetooth: hci0: Set UART break: on, status=0 Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() tx_work scheduled Bluetooth: hci0: btnxpuart_tx_work() dequeue: 01 0A 20 01 00 Can't set advertise mode on hci0: Connection timed out (110) Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x200a tx timeout When the power save mechanism turns on UART break, and btnxpuart_tx_work() is scheduled simultaneously, psdata->ps_state is read as PS_STATE_AWAKE, which prevents the psdata->work from being scheduled, which is responsible to turn OFF UART break. This issue is fixed by adding a ps_lock mutex around UART break on/off as well as around ps_state read/write. btnxpuart_tx_wakeup() will now read updated ps_state value. If ps_state is PS_STATE_SLEEP, it will first schedule psdata->work, and then it will reschedule itself once UART break has been turned off and ps_state is PS_STATE_AWAKE. Tested above script for 50,000 iterations and TX timeout error was not observed anymore.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1754Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-86

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-86

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-53531 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21969 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22023 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0841Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-4515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0827Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42265 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22045 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0805Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-28956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21971 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-49053 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3867 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4130 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4515 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37890 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38000 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38001 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029444Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 689ca16e523278470c38832a3010645a78c544d8 < 9d5df94ce0e213d5b549633f528f96114c736190, 689ca16e523278470c38832a3010645a78c544d8 < e4db90e4eb8d5487098712ffb1048f3fa6d25e98, 6.4
Fixed
Linux: < 6.4, 6.6.49 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.9 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Aug 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-54861
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-58238 · cve.blacktree.nl