BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-58099High confidence

vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame

Linux · Linux

8.6HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.33% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-14197

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame Andrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium's service load-balancing in case of vmxnet3. If a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as IPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case of vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped on the path. vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp() through vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address: page = virt_to_page(xdpf->data); tbi->dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM; dma_sync_single_for_device(&adapter->pdev->dev, tbi->dma_addr, buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); The above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP BPF program could have moved xdp->data. While the passed buf_size is correct (xdpf->len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which can be calculated as xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame Andrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium's service load-balancing in case of vmxnet3. If a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as IPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case of vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped on the path. vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp() through vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address: page = virt_to_page(xdpf->data); tbi->dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM; dma_sync_single_for_device(&adapter->pdev->dev, tbi->dma_addr, buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); The above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP BPF program could have moved xdp->data. While the passed buf_size is correct (xdpf->len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which can be calculated as xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame Andrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium's service load-balancing in case of vmxnet3. If a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as IPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case of vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped on the path. vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp() through vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address: page = virt_to_page(xdpf->data); tbi->dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM; dma_sync_single_for_device(&adapter->pdev->dev, tbi->dma_addr, buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); The above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP BPF program could have moved xdp->data. While the passed buf_size is correct (xdpf->len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which can be calculated as xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0904Linux Kernel: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0723Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56613 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56699 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57995 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58015 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21713 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0561Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2024-26669 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26939 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104 Gestion détaillée du document le 04 juillet 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-58083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58091 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58099 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-023987Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 54f00cce11786742bd11e5e68c3bf85e6dc048c9 < 59ba6cdadb9c26b606a365eb9c9b25eb2052622d, 54f00cce11786742bd11e5e68c3bf85e6dc048c9 < f82eb34fb59a8fb96c19f4f492c20eb774140bb5, 54f00cce11786742bd11e5e68c3bf85e6dc048c9 < 4678adf94da4a9e9683817b246b58ce15fb81782, 6.6
Fixed
Linux: < 6.6, 6.6.59 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.6 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Apr 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-14197
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-58099 · cve.blacktree.nl