BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-58006High confidence

PCI: dwc: ep: Prevent changing BAR size/flags in pci_epc_set_bar()

Linux · Linux

9.6CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Critical technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

19 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5196

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Critical technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: dwc: ep: Prevent changing BAR size/flags in pci_epc_set_bar() In commit 4284c88fff0e ("PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address") set_bar() was modified to support dynamically changing the backing physical address of a BAR that was already configured. This means that set_bar() can be called twice, without ever calling clear_bar() (as calling clear_bar() would clear the BAR's PCI address assigned by the host). This can only be done if the new BAR size/flags does not differ from the existing BAR configuration. Add these missing checks. If we allow set_bar() to set e.g. a new BAR size that differs from the existing BAR size, the new address translation range will be smaller than the BAR size already determined by the host, which would mean that a read past the new BAR size would pass the iATU untranslated, which could allow the host to read memory not belonging to the new struct pci_epf_bar. While at it, add comments which clarifies the support for dynamically changing the physical address of a BAR. (Which was also missing.)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: dwc: ep: Prevent changing BAR size/flags in pci_epc_set_bar() In commit 4284c88fff0e ("PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address") set_bar() was modified to support dynamically changing the backing physical address of a BAR that was already configured. This means that set_bar() can be called twice, without ever calling clear_bar() (as calling clear_bar() would clear the BAR's PCI address assigned by the host). This can only be done if the new BAR size/flags does not differ from the existing BAR configuration. Add these missing checks. If we allow set_bar() to set e.g. a new BAR size that differs from the existing BAR size, the new address translation range will be smaller than the BAR size already determined by the host, which would mean that a read past the new BAR size would pass the iATU untranslated, which could allow the host to read memory not belonging to the new struct pci_epf_bar. While at it, add comments which clarifies the support for dynamically changing the physical address of a BAR. (Which was also missing.)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI: dwc: ep: Prevent changing BAR size/flags in pci_epc_set_bar() In commit 4284c88fff0e ("PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address") set_bar() was modified to support dynamically changing the backing physical address of a BAR that was already configured. This means that set_bar() can be called twice, without ever calling clear_bar() (as calling clear_bar() would clear the BAR's PCI address assigned by the host). This can only be done if the new BAR size/flags does not differ from the existing BAR configuration. Add these missing checks. If we allow set_bar() to set e.g. a new BAR size that differs from the existing BAR size, the new address translation range will be smaller than the BAR size already determined by the host, which would mean that a read past the new BAR size would pass the iATU untranslated, which could allow the host to read memory not belonging to the new struct pci_epf_bar. While at it, add comments which clarifies the support for dynamically changing the physical address of a BAR. (Which was also missing.)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Unauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0453Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58003 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57998 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57997 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58006 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58011 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58012 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58014 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58014 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58017 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
4284c88fff0efc4e418abb53d78e02dc4f099d6c < b5cacfd067060c75088363ed3e19779078be2755; 4284c88fff0efc4e418abb53d78e02dc4f099d6c < 3229c15d6267de8e704b4085df8a82a5af2d63eb; 4284c88fff0efc4e418abb53d78e02dc4f099d6c < 3708acbd5f169ebafe1faa519cb28adc56295546; 6.0
Fixed
< 6.0; 6.12.14 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.3 ≤ 6.13.*; 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Feb 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5196
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-58006 · cve.blacktree.nl