BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57977High confidence

memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.133-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-265688 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 13 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-265688: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP V1.1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem
Summary
memcg: A soft lockup vulnerability in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-5274

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 31 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5274Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0453Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ions Desigo CC toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-15467 Desigo CC versions antérieures à 9.0.1 SIMATIC S7-1500 versions supérieures ou égales à 3.1.6 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-26783, CVE-2024-27056, CVE-2024-28956, CVE-2024-36903, CVE-2024-36927, CVE-2024-42079, CVE-2024-46786, CVE-2024-47736, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-49968, CVE-2024-49994, CVE-2024-49998, CVE-2024-50014, CVE-2024-50063, CVE-2024-50164, CVE-2024-50298, CVE-2024-53124, CVE-2024-53170, CVE-2024-54458, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56703, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57973, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57979, CVE-2024-58011, CVE-2024-58016, CVE-2024-58020, CVE-2024-58056, CVE-2024-58058, CVE-2024-58061, CVE-2024-58086, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57970 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0758Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57953 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57984 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0743Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-50280 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53203 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0721Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-38541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38541 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49950 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0605Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-26996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58007 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56721 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0492Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

périeures ou égales àV3.1.5 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-4527, CVE-2023-4806, CVE-2023-4911, CVE-2023-5363, CVE-2023-6246, CVE-2023-6779, CVE-2023-6780, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-38545, CVE-2023-38546, CVE-2023-44487, CVE-2023-46218, CVE-2023-46219, CVE-2023-48795, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-51385, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-2961, CVE-2024-6119, CVE-2024-6387, CVE-2024-12133, CVE-2024-12243, CVE-2024-24855, CVE-2024-26596, CVE-2024-28085, CVE-2024-33599, CVE-2024-33600, CVE-2024-33601, CVE-2024-33602, CVE-2024-34397, CVE-2024-37370, CVE-2024-37371, CVE-2024-45490, CVE-2024-45491, CVE-2024-45492, CVE-2024-50246, CVE-2024-53166, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57996, CVE-2024-58005, CVE-2025-4373, CVE-2025-4598, CVE-2025-21701, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21724, CVE-2025-21728, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21756, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21766, CVE-2025-21767, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21848, CVE-2025-21862, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21865, CVE-2025-26465, CVE-2025-31115 et CVE-2025-46836. Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance. Solutions Se

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57981 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57986 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58001 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0333Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-40973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-020227Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0187Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Manipulatie van gegevens - Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (root/admin rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - Toegang tot systeemgegevens - Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens - Spoofing De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.6, 5.4.291 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.235 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.130 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.80 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.13 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.2 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Feb 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-5274
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 72f2c0b7c152c2983ed51d48c3272cab4f34d965; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 110399858194c71f11afefad6e7be9e3876b284f; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < a9042dbc1ed4bf25a5f5c699d10c3d676abf8ca2; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 0a09d56e1682c951046bf15542b3e9553046c9f6; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 972486d37169fe85035e81b8c5dff21f70df1173; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < c3a3741db8c1202aa959c77df3a4c361612d1eb1; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 46576834291869457d4772bb7df72d7c2bb3d57f; 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < ade81479c7dda1ce3eedb215c78bc615bbd04f06 · Fixed: < 3.6; 5.4.291 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.235 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.130 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.80 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.13 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13.2 ≤ 6.13.*
    After
    Linux: 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 72f2c0b7c152c2983ed51d48c3272cab4f34d965, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 110399858194c71f11afefad6e7be9e3876b284f, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < a9042dbc1ed4bf25a5f5c699d10c3d676abf8ca2, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 0a09d56e1682c951046bf15542b3e9553046c9f6, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 972486d37169fe85035e81b8c5dff21f70df1173, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < c3a3741db8c1202aa959c77df3a4c361612d1eb1, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < 46576834291869457d4772bb7df72d7c2bb3d57f, 9cbb78bb314360a860a8b23723971cb6fcb54176 < ade81479c7dda1ce3eedb215c78bc615bbd04f06, 3.6 · Fixed: Linux: < 3.6, 5.4.291 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.235 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.179 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.130 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.80 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.13 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13.2 ≤ 6.13.*, 6.14 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57977 · cve.blacktree.nl