BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57965High confidence

NOTE: some parties feel that the code change only addresses a warning message from a SAST tool and does not fix a vulnerability

axios · axios

0.0NoneCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Monitor

The structured sources do not provide enough evidence for a stronger action window. Track vendor updates and assess local exposure.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityNoneOperational priority:None, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.38% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs axios axios and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenode-axiosVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.7.9+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenode-axiosVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.2.1+dfsg-1+deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenode-axiosVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.7.9+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenode-axiosVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.1.7.9+dfsg-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appsnode-axiosUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53865

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionMonitor

The structured sources do not provide enough evidence for a stronger action window. Track vendor updates and assess local exposure.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In axios before 1.7.8, lib/helpers/isURLSameOrigin.js does not use a URL object when determining an origin, and has a potentially unwanted setAttribute('href',href) call. NOTE: some parties feel that the code change only addresses a warning message from a SAST tool and does not fix a vulnerability.

What

In axios before 1.7.8, lib/helpers/isURLSameOrigin.js does not use a URL object when determining an origin, and has a potentially unwanted setAttribute('href',href) call. NOTE: some parties feel that the code change only addresses a warning message from a SAST tool and does not fix a vulnerability.

Why

The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In axios before 1.7.8, lib/helpers/isURLSameOrigin.js does not use a URL object when determining an origin, and has a potentially unwanted setAttribute('href',href) call. NOTE: some parties feel that the code change only addresses a warning message from a SAST tool and does not fix a vulnerability.

Why

The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Origin Validation Error → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-346 ↗

CWE-346: Origin Validation Error. The product does not properly verify that the source of data or communication is valid.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-346
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0841IBM App Connect Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM App Connect Enterprise ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Informationen auszuspähen oder seine Privilegien zu eskalieren

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0580IBM License Metric Tool: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im IBM License Metric Tool ausnutzen, um Daten (Protokolldateien) zu manipulieren, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder SSRF-Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0109Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-45338 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47072 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-48949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57699 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6763 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-11083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-12758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0512Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-47535 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47561 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49761 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51744 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52046 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53382 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57965 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6827 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0917 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0923 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-014295axios project の Node.js 用 axios における同一生成元ポリシー違反に関する脆弱性

axios project の Node.js 用 axios には、同一生成元ポリシー違反に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
axios: < 1.7.8
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Jan 2025 · Last source change 29 Jan 2025, 14:14 UTC · CWE-346 · Origin Validation Error

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53865
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57965 · cve.blacktree.nl