BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57936High confidence

RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix max SGEs for the Work Request

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.40% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53839

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix max SGEs for the Work Request Gen P7 supports up to 13 SGEs for now. WQE software structure can hold only 6 now. Since the max send sge is reported as 13, the stack can give requests up to 13 SGEs. This is causing traffic failures and system crashes. Use the define for max SGE supported for variable size. This will work for both static and variable WQEs.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix max SGEs for the Work Request Gen P7 supports up to 13 SGEs for now. WQE software structure can hold only 6 now. Since the max send sge is reported as 13, the stack can give requests up to 13 SGEs. This is causing traffic failures and system crashes. Use the define for max SGE supported for variable size. This will work for both static and variable WQEs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix max SGEs for the Work Request Gen P7 supports up to 13 SGEs for now. WQE software structure can hold only 6 now. Since the max send sge is reported as 13, the stack can give requests up to 13 SGEs. This is causing traffic failures and system crashes. Use the define for max SGE supported for variable size. This will work for both static and variable WQEs.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0155Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250122Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025, published on 22 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-57852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57914 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57985 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57987 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57988 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57989 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57931 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57913 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57915 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57916 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57926 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21650 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-029007Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 36e1b6890f228ccfc867031ecedffe50958b25e4 < 3de1b50f055dc2ca7072a526cdda21f691c22dd9, 227f51743b61fe3f6fc481f0fb8086bf8c49b8c9 < 9a479088e0c8f6140b8c7752b563bc8c6c6dcc8c, 227f51743b61fe3f6fc481f0fb8086bf8c49b8c9 < 79d330fbdffd8cee06d8bdf38d82cb62d8363a27, 6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 6.12, 6.12.9 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Jan 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53839
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57936 · cve.blacktree.nl