BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57889High confidence

pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fix sleeping in atomic context due to regmap locking

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.124-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53792

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fix sleeping in atomic context due to regmap locking If a device uses MCP23xxx IO expander to receive IRQs, the following bug can happen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, ... preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 ... Call Trace: ... __might_resched+0x104/0x10e __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62 mutex_lock+0x20/0x4c regmap_lock_mutex+0x10/0x18 regmap_update_bits_base+0x2c/0x66 mcp23s08_irq_set_type+0x1ae/0x1d6 __irq_set_trigger+0x56/0x172 __setup_irq+0x1e6/0x646 request_threaded_irq+0xb6/0x160 ... We observed the problem while experimenting with a touchscreen driver which used MCP23017 IO expander (I2C). The regmap in the pinctrl-mcp23s08 driver uses a mutex for protection from concurrent accesses, which is the default for regmaps without .fast_io, .disable_locking, etc. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() calls regmap_update_bits_base(), and the latter locks the mutex. However, __setup_irq() locks desc->lock spinlock before calling these functions. As a result, the system tries to lock the mutex whole holding the spinlock. It seems, the internal regmap locks are not needed in this driver at all. mcp->lock seems to protect the regmap from concurrent accesses already, except, probably, in mcp_pinconf_get/set. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() and mcp23s08_irq_mask/unmask() are called under chip_bus_lock(), which calls mcp23s08_irq_bus_lock(). The latter takes mcp->lock and enables regmap caching, so that the potentially slow I2C accesses are deferred until chip_bus_unlock(). The accesses to the regmap from mcp23s08_probe_one() do not need additional locking. In all remaining places where the regmap is accessed, except mcp_pinconf_get/set(), the driver already takes mcp->lock. This patch adds locking in mcp_pinconf_get/set() and disables internal locking in the regmap config. Among other things, it fixes the sleeping in atomic context described above.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fix sleeping in atomic context due to regmap locking If a device uses MCP23xxx IO expander to receive IRQs, the following bug can happen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, ... preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 ... Call Trace: ... __might_resched+0x104/0x10e __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62 mutex_lock+0x20/0x4c regmap_lock_mutex+0x10/0x18 regmap_update_bits_base+0x2c/0x66 mcp23s08_irq_set_type+0x1ae/0x1d6 __irq_set_trigger+0x56/0x172 __setup_irq+0x1e6/0x646 request_threaded_irq+0xb6/0x160 ... We observed the problem while experimenting with a touchscreen driver which used MCP23017 IO expander (I2C). The regmap in the pinctrl-mcp23s08 driver uses a mutex for protection from concurrent accesses, which is the default for regmaps without .fast_io, .disable_locking, etc. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() calls regmap_update_bits_base(), and the latter locks the mutex. However, __setup_irq() locks desc->lock spinlock before calling these functions. As a result, the system tries to lock the mutex whole holding the spinlock. It seems, the internal regmap locks are not needed in this driver at all. mcp->lock seems to protect the regmap from concurrent accesses already, except, probably, in mcp_pinconf_get/set. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() and mcp23s08_irq_mask/unmask() are called under chip_bus_lock(), which calls mcp23s08_irq_bus_lock(). The latter takes mcp->lock and enables regmap caching, so that the potentially slow I2C accesses are deferred until chip_bus_unlock(). The accesses to the regmap from mcp23s08_probe_one() do not need additional locking. In all remaining places where the regmap is accessed, except mcp_pinconf_get/set(), the driver already takes mcp->lock. This patch adds locking in mcp_pinconf_get/set() and disables internal locking in the regmap config. Among other things, it fixes the sleeping in atomic context described above.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinctrl: mcp23s08: Fix sleeping in atomic context due to regmap locking If a device uses MCP23xxx IO expander to receive IRQs, the following bug can happen: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, ... preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 ... Call Trace: ... __might_resched+0x104/0x10e __might_sleep+0x3e/0x62 mutex_lock+0x20/0x4c regmap_lock_mutex+0x10/0x18 regmap_update_bits_base+0x2c/0x66 mcp23s08_irq_set_type+0x1ae/0x1d6 __irq_set_trigger+0x56/0x172 __setup_irq+0x1e6/0x646 request_threaded_irq+0xb6/0x160 ... We observed the problem while experimenting with a touchscreen driver which used MCP23017 IO expander (I2C). The regmap in the pinctrl-mcp23s08 driver uses a mutex for protection from concurrent accesses, which is the default for regmaps without .fast_io, .disable_locking, etc. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() calls regmap_update_bits_base(), and the latter locks the mutex. However, __setup_irq() locks desc->lock spinlock before calling these functions. As a result, the system tries to lock the mutex whole holding the spinlock. It seems, the internal regmap locks are not needed in this driver at all. mcp->lock seems to protect the regmap from concurrent accesses already, except, probably, in mcp_pinconf_get/set. mcp23s08_irq_set_type() and mcp23s08_irq_mask/unmask() are called under chip_bus_lock(), which calls mcp23s08_irq_bus_lock(). The latter takes mcp->lock and enables regmap caching, so that the potentially slow I2C accesses are deferred until chip_bus_unlock(). The accesses to the regmap from mcp23s08_probe_one() do not need additional locking. In all remaining places where the regmap is accessed, except mcp_pinconf_get/set(), the driver already takes mcp->lock. This patch adds locking in mcp_pinconf_get/set() and disables internal locking in the regmap config. Among other things, it fixes the sleeping in atomic context described above.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0105Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250122Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025, published on 22 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0308Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0183Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028925Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < 788d9e9a41b81893d6bb8faa05f045c975278318, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < c55d186376a87b468c9ee30f2195e0f3857f61a0, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < 9372e160d8211a7e17f2abff8370794f182df785, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < 0310cbad163a908d09d99c26827859365cd71fcb, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < 8c6fd5803b988a5e78c9b9e42c70a936d7cfc6ec, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < 830f838589522404cd7c2f0f540602f25034af61, 8f38910ba4f662222157ce07a0d5becc4328c46a < a37eecb705f33726f1fb7cd2a67e514a15dfe693, 4.13
Fixed
Linux: < 4.13, 5.4.289 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.233 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.176 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.124 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.70 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.9 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Jan 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:59 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53792
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57889 · cve.blacktree.nl