BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57884High confidence

mm: vmscan: account for free pages to prevent infinite Loop in throttle_direct_reclaim()

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.124-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
mm: vmscan: account for free pages to prevent infinite Loop in throttle_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53787

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: account for free pages to prevent infinite Loop in throttle_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false. #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac #1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c #2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c #3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550 #4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68 #5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660 #6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98 #7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8 #8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974 #9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4 At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones: NODE: 4 ZONE: 0 ADDR: ffff00817fffe540 NAME: "DMA32" SIZE: 20480 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 359 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 NODE: 4 ZONE: 1 ADDR: ffff00817fffec00 NAME: "Normal" SIZE: 8454144 PRESENT: 98304 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 146 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages() based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero. Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/ active anonymous pages is skipped. crash> p nr_swap_pages nr_swap_pages = $1937 = { counter = 0 } As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark. The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented. crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures $1935 = 0x0 This is because the node deemed balanced. The node balancing logic in balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively. If one or more zones (e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the entire node is deemed balanced. This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain under significant pressure. The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages). This change prevents zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being mistakenly deemed unreclaimable. By doing so, the patch ensures proper node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL, and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false. The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL. This issue arises from zone_reclaimable_pages ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: account for free pages to prevent infinite Loop in throttle_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false. #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac #1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c #2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c #3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550 #4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68 #5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660 #6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98 #7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8 #8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974 #9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4 At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones: NODE: 4 ZONE: 0 ADDR: ffff00817fffe540 NAME: "DMA32" SIZE: 20480 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 359 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 NODE: 4 ZONE: 1 ADDR: ffff00817fffec00 NAME: "Normal" SIZE: 8454144 PRESENT: 98304 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 146 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages() based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero. Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/ active anonymous pages is skipped. crash> p nr_swap_pages nr_swap_pages = $1937 = { counter = 0 } As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark. The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented. crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures $1935 = 0x0 This is because the node deemed balanced. The node balancing logic in balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively. If one or more zones (e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the entire node is deemed balanced. This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain under significant pressure. The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages). This change prevents zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being mistakenly deemed unreclaimable. By doing so, the patch ensures proper node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL, and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false. The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL. This issue arises from zone_reclaimable_pages ---truncated---

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: vmscan: account for free pages to prevent infinite Loop in throttle_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false. #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac #1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c #2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c #3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550 #4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68 #5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660 #6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98 #7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8 #8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974 #9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4 At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones: NODE: 4 ZONE: 0 ADDR: ffff00817fffe540 NAME: "DMA32" SIZE: 20480 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 359 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 NODE: 4 ZONE: 1 ADDR: ffff00817fffec00 NAME: "Normal" SIZE: 8454144 PRESENT: 98304 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 146 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages() based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero. Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/ active anonymous pages is skipped. crash> p nr_swap_pages nr_swap_pages = $1937 = { counter = 0 } As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark. The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented. crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures $1935 = 0x0 This is because the node deemed balanced. The node balancing logic in balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively. If one or more zones (e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the entire node is deemed balanced. This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain under significant pressure. The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages). This change prevents zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being mistakenly deemed unreclaimable. By doing so, the patch ensures proper node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL, and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false. The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL. This issue arises from zone_reclaimable_pages ---truncated---

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835 ↗

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0105Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250122Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Jan 2025, published on 22 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0308Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57885 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57894 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028924Linux の Linux Kernel における無限ループに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、無限ループに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.8, 5.4.289 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.233 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.176 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.124 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.70 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.9 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Jan 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:59 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53787
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57884 · cve.blacktree.nl