BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-57876High confidence

drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal

Linux · Linux

7.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.123-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-57876 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 72 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-57876
19 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-livepatch as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-livepatch-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP5
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal If the MST topology is removed during the reception of an MST down reply or MST up request sideband message, the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::up_req_recv/down_rep_recv states could be reset from one thread via drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(false), racing with the reading/parsing of the message from another thread via drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() or drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(). The race is possible since the reader/parser doesn't hold any lock while accessing the reception state. This in turn can lead to a memory corruption in the reader/parser as described by commit bd2fccac61b4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length check"). Fix the above by resetting the message reception state if needed before reading/parsing a message. Another solution would be to hold the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::lock for the whole duration of the message reception/parsing in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(), however this would require a bigger change. Since the fix is also needed for stable, opting for the simpler solution in this patch.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2024-57876 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal
200 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal If the MST topology is removed during the reception of an MST down reply or MST up request sideband message, the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::up_req_recv/down_rep_recv states could be reset from one thread via drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(false), racing with the reading/parsing of the message from another thread via drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() or drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(). The race is possible since the reader/parser doesn't hold any lock while accessing the reception state. This in turn can lead to a memory corruption in the reader/parser as described by commit bd2fccac61b4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length check"). Fix the above by resetting the message reception state if needed before reading/parsing a message. Another solution would be to hold the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::lock for the whole duration of the message reception/parsing in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(), however this would require a bigger change. Since the fix is also needed for stable, opting for the simpler solution in this patch.
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53779

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal If the MST topology is removed during the reception of an MST down reply or MST up request sideband message, the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::up_req_recv/down_rep_recv states could be reset from one thread via drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(false), racing with the reading/parsing of the message from another thread via drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() or drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(). The race is possible since the reader/parser doesn't hold any lock while accessing the reception state. This in turn can lead to a memory corruption in the reader/parser as described by commit bd2fccac61b4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length check"). Fix the above by resetting the message reception state if needed before reading/parsing a message. Another solution would be to hold the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::lock for the whole duration of the message reception/parsing in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(), however this would require a bigger change. Since the fix is also needed for stable, opting for the simpler solution in this patch.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal If the MST topology is removed during the reception of an MST down reply or MST up request sideband message, the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::up_req_recv/down_rep_recv states could be reset from one thread via drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(false), racing with the reading/parsing of the message from another thread via drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() or drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(). The race is possible since the reader/parser doesn't hold any lock while accessing the reception state. This in turn can lead to a memory corruption in the reader/parser as described by commit bd2fccac61b4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length check"). Fix the above by resetting the message reception state if needed before reading/parsing a message. Another solution would be to hold the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::lock for the whole duration of the message reception/parsing in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(), however this would require a bigger change. Since the fix is also needed for stable, opting for the simpler solution in this patch.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp_mst: Fix resetting msg rx state after topology removal If the MST topology is removed during the reception of an MST down reply or MST up request sideband message, the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::up_req_recv/down_rep_recv states could be reset from one thread via drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(false), racing with the reading/parsing of the message from another thread via drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() or drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(). The race is possible since the reader/parser doesn't hold any lock while accessing the reception state. This in turn can lead to a memory corruption in the reader/parser as described by commit bd2fccac61b4 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix MST sideband message body length check"). Fix the above by resetting the message reception state if needed before reading/parsing a message. Another solution would be to hold the drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr::lock for the whole duration of the message reception/parsing in drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep() and drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(), however this would require a bigger change. Since the fix is also needed for stable, opting for the simpler solution in this patch.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0047Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen und weitere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe zu starten.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250115Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025, published on 15 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-56788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-56788 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57895 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0466Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-57839 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57878 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57878 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57879 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57880 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57894 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028537Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.3, 6.1.120 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.66 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.5 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Jan 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:56 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53779
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-57876 · cve.blacktree.nl