BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2024-56787High confidence

soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform driver

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.123-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-56787 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 59 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-56787
227 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform driver With driver_async_probe=* on kernel command line, the following trace is produced because on i.MX8M Plus hardware because the soc-imx8m.c driver calls of_clk_get_by_name() which returns -EPROBE_DEFER because the clock driver is not yet probed. This was not detected during regular testing without driver_async_probe. Convert the SoC code to platform driver and instantiate a platform device in its current device_initcall() to probe the platform driver. Rework .soc_revision callback to always return valid error code and return SoC revision via parameter. This way, if anything in the .soc_revision callback return -EPROBE_DEFER, it gets propagated to .probe and the .probe will get retried later. " ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c:115 imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-next-20240924-00002-g2062bb554dea #603 Hardware name: DH electronics i.MX8M Plus DHCOM Premium Developer Kit (3) (DT) pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 lr : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xd0/0x180 sp : ffff8000821fbcc0 x29: ffff8000821fbce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800081810120 x26: ffff8000818a9970 x25: 0000000000000006 x24: 0000000000824311 x23: ffff8000817f42c8 x22: ffff0000df8be210 x21: fffffffffffffdfb x20: ffff800082780000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffff800081fff418 x16: ffff8000823e1000 x15: ffff0000c03b65e8 x14: ffff0000c00051b0 x13: ffff800082790000 x12: 0000000000000801 x11: ffff80008278ffff x10: ffff80008209d3a6 x9 : ffff80008062e95c x8 : ffff8000821fb9a0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 00000000000080e3 x5 : ffff0000df8c03d8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : fffffffffffffdfb x0 : fffffffffffffdfb Call trace: imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 imx8_soc_init+0xb0/0x1e0 do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1a8 kernel_init_freeable+0x240/0x2a8 kernel_init+0x28/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- SoC: i.MX8MP revision 1.1 "
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53430

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform driver With driver_async_probe=* on kernel command line, the following trace is produced because on i.MX8M Plus hardware because the soc-imx8m.c driver calls of_clk_get_by_name() which returns -EPROBE_DEFER because the clock driver is not yet probed. This was not detected during regular testing without driver_async_probe. Convert the SoC code to platform driver and instantiate a platform device in its current device_initcall() to probe the platform driver. Rework .soc_revision callback to always return valid error code and return SoC revision via parameter. This way, if anything in the .soc_revision callback return -EPROBE_DEFER, it gets propagated to .probe and the .probe will get retried later. " ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c:115 imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-next-20240924-00002-g2062bb554dea #603 Hardware name: DH electronics i.MX8M Plus DHCOM Premium Developer Kit (3) (DT) pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 lr : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xd0/0x180 sp : ffff8000821fbcc0 x29: ffff8000821fbce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800081810120 x26: ffff8000818a9970 x25: 0000000000000006 x24: 0000000000824311 x23: ffff8000817f42c8 x22: ffff0000df8be210 x21: fffffffffffffdfb x20: ffff800082780000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffff800081fff418 x16: ffff8000823e1000 x15: ffff0000c03b65e8 x14: ffff0000c00051b0 x13: ffff800082790000 x12: 0000000000000801 x11: ffff80008278ffff x10: ffff80008209d3a6 x9 : ffff80008062e95c x8 : ffff8000821fb9a0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 00000000000080e3 x5 : ffff0000df8c03d8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : fffffffffffffdfb x0 : fffffffffffffdfb Call trace: imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 imx8_soc_init+0xb0/0x1e0 do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1a8 kernel_init_freeable+0x240/0x2a8 kernel_init+0x28/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- SoC: i.MX8MP revision 1.1 "

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform driver With driver_async_probe=* on kernel command line, the following trace is produced because on i.MX8M Plus hardware because the soc-imx8m.c driver calls of_clk_get_by_name() which returns -EPROBE_DEFER because the clock driver is not yet probed. This was not detected during regular testing without driver_async_probe. Convert the SoC code to platform driver and instantiate a platform device in its current device_initcall() to probe the platform driver. Rework .soc_revision callback to always return valid error code and return SoC revision via parameter. This way, if anything in the .soc_revision callback return -EPROBE_DEFER, it gets propagated to .probe and the .probe will get retried later. " ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c:115 imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-next-20240924-00002-g2062bb554dea #603 Hardware name: DH electronics i.MX8M Plus DHCOM Premium Developer Kit (3) (DT) pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 lr : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xd0/0x180 sp : ffff8000821fbcc0 x29: ffff8000821fbce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800081810120 x26: ffff8000818a9970 x25: 0000000000000006 x24: 0000000000824311 x23: ffff8000817f42c8 x22: ffff0000df8be210 x21: fffffffffffffdfb x20: ffff800082780000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffff800081fff418 x16: ffff8000823e1000 x15: ffff0000c03b65e8 x14: ffff0000c00051b0 x13: ffff800082790000 x12: 0000000000000801 x11: ffff80008278ffff x10: ffff80008209d3a6 x9 : ffff80008062e95c x8 : ffff8000821fb9a0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 00000000000080e3 x5 : ffff0000df8c03d8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : fffffffffffffdfb x0 : fffffffffffffdfb Call trace: imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 imx8_soc_init+0xb0/0x1e0 do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1a8 kernel_init_freeable+0x240/0x2a8 kernel_init+0x28/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- SoC: i.MX8MP revision 1.1 "

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: soc: imx8m: Probe the SoC driver as platform driver With driver_async_probe=* on kernel command line, the following trace is produced because on i.MX8M Plus hardware because the soc-imx8m.c driver calls of_clk_get_by_name() which returns -EPROBE_DEFER because the clock driver is not yet probed. This was not detected during regular testing without driver_async_probe. Convert the SoC code to platform driver and instantiate a platform device in its current device_initcall() to probe the platform driver. Rework .soc_revision callback to always return valid error code and return SoC revision via parameter. This way, if anything in the .soc_revision callback return -EPROBE_DEFER, it gets propagated to .probe and the .probe will get retried later. " ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c:115 imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-next-20240924-00002-g2062bb554dea #603 Hardware name: DH electronics i.MX8M Plus DHCOM Premium Developer Kit (3) (DT) pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 lr : imx8mm_soc_revision+0xd0/0x180 sp : ffff8000821fbcc0 x29: ffff8000821fbce0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800081810120 x26: ffff8000818a9970 x25: 0000000000000006 x24: 0000000000824311 x23: ffff8000817f42c8 x22: ffff0000df8be210 x21: fffffffffffffdfb x20: ffff800082780000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: ffff800081fff418 x16: ffff8000823e1000 x15: ffff0000c03b65e8 x14: ffff0000c00051b0 x13: ffff800082790000 x12: 0000000000000801 x11: ffff80008278ffff x10: ffff80008209d3a6 x9 : ffff80008062e95c x8 : ffff8000821fb9a0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 00000000000080e3 x5 : ffff0000df8c03d8 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : fffffffffffffdfb x0 : fffffffffffffdfb Call trace: imx8mm_soc_revision+0xdc/0x180 imx8_soc_init+0xb0/0x1e0 do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1a8 kernel_init_freeable+0x240/0x2a8 kernel_init+0x28/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- SoC: i.MX8MP revision 1.1 "

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0035Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250115Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Jan 2025, published on 15 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0308Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56770 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56784 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56786 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57799 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56767 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-016785Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.2, 5.15.174 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.120 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.66 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.5 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Jan 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:59 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53430
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-56787 · cve.blacktree.nl