BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-56644High confidence

net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.69% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.123-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2024-56644 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 80 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-56644
384 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table. There are several conditions that must be fulfilled for the leak to occur: * an ICMPv6 packet indicating a change of the MTU for the path is received, resulting in an exception dst being created * a TCP connection that uses the exception dst for routing packets must start timing out so that TCP begins retransmissions * after the exception dst expires, the FIB6 garbage collector must not run before TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for the expired exception dst When TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for an exception dst that has expired and if no other socket holds a reference to the exception dst, the refcount of the exception dst is 2, which corresponds to the increment made by dst_init() and the increment made by the TCP socket for which the connection is timing out. The refcount made by the socket is never released. The refcount of the dst is decremented in sk_dst_reset() but that decrement is counteracted by a dst_hold() intentionally placed just before the sk_dst_reset() in ip6_negative_advice(). After ip6_negative_advice() has finished, there is no other object tied to the dst. The socket lost its reference stored in sk_dst_cache and the dst is no longer in the exception table. The exception dst becomes a leaked object. As a result of this dst leak, an unbalanced refcount is reported for the loopback device of a net namespace being destroyed under kernels that do not contain e5f80fcf869a ("ipv6: give an IPv6 dev to blackhole_netdev"): unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 2 Fix the dst leak by removing the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice(). The patch that introduced the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice() was 92f1655aa2b22 ("net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race"). But 92f1655aa2b22 merely refactored the code with regards to the dst refcount so the issue was present even before 92f1655aa2b22. The bug was introduced in 54c1a859efd9f ("ipv6: Don't drop cache route entry unless timer actually expired.") where the expired cached route is deleted and the sk_dst_cache member of the socket is set to NULL by calling dst_negative_advice() but the refcount belonging to the socket is left unbalanced. The IPv4 version - ipv4_negative_advice() - is not affected by this bug. When the TCP connection times out ipv4_negative_advice() merely resets the sk_dst_cache of the socket while decrementing the refcount of the exception dst.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53292

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 27 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table. There are several conditions that must be fulfilled for the leak to occur: * an ICMPv6 packet indicating a change of the MTU for the path is received, resulting in an exception dst being created * a TCP connection that uses the exception dst for routing packets must start timing out so that TCP begins retransmissions * after the exception dst expires, the FIB6 garbage collector must not run before TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for the expired exception dst When TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for an exception dst that has expired and if no other socket holds a reference to the exception dst, the refcount of the exception dst is 2, which corresponds to the increment made by dst_init() and the increment made by the TCP socket for which the connection is timing out. The refcount made by the socket is never released. The refcount of the dst is decremented in sk_dst_reset() but that decrement is counteracted by a dst_hold() intentionally placed just before the sk_dst_reset() in ip6_negative_advice(). After ip6_negative_advice() has finished, there is no other object tied to the dst. The socket lost its reference stored in sk_dst_cache and the dst is no longer in the exception table. The exception dst becomes a leaked object. As a result of this dst leak, an unbalanced refcount is reported for the loopback device of a net namespace being destroyed under kernels that do not contain e5f80fcf869a ("ipv6: give an IPv6 dev to blackhole_netdev"): unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 2 Fix the dst leak by removing the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice(). The patch that introduced the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice() was 92f1655aa2b22 ("net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race"). But 92f1655aa2b22 merely refactored the code with regards to the dst refcount so the issue was present even before 92f1655aa2b22. The bug was introduced in 54c1a859efd9f ("ipv6: Don't drop cache route entry unless timer actually expired.") where the expired cached route is deleted and the sk_dst_cache member of the socket is set to NULL by calling dst_negative_advice() but the refcount belonging to the socket is left unbalanced. The IPv4 version - ipv4_negative_advice() - is not affected by this bug. When the TCP connection times out ipv4_negative_advice() merely resets the sk_dst_cache of the socket while decrementing the refcount of the exception dst.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table. There are several conditions that must be fulfilled for the leak to occur: * an ICMPv6 packet indicating a change of the MTU for the path is received, resulting in an exception dst being created * a TCP connection that uses the exception dst for routing packets must start timing out so that TCP begins retransmissions * after the exception dst expires, the FIB6 garbage collector must not run before TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for the expired exception dst When TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for an exception dst that has expired and if no other socket holds a reference to the exception dst, the refcount of the exception dst is 2, which corresponds to the increment made by dst_init() and the increment made by the TCP socket for which the connection is timing out. The refcount made by the socket is never released. The refcount of the dst is decremented in sk_dst_reset() but that decrement is counteracted by a dst_hold() intentionally placed just before the sk_dst_reset() in ip6_negative_advice(). After ip6_negative_advice() has finished, there is no other object tied to the dst. The socket lost its reference stored in sk_dst_cache and the dst is no longer in the exception table. The exception dst becomes a leaked object. As a result of this dst leak, an unbalanced refcount is reported for the loopback device of a net namespace being destroyed under kernels that do not contain e5f80fcf869a ("ipv6: give an IPv6 dev to blackhole_netdev"): unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 2 Fix the dst leak by removing the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice(). The patch that introduced the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice() was 92f1655aa2b22 ("net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race"). But 92f1655aa2b22 merely refactored the code with regards to the dst refcount so the issue was present even before 92f1655aa2b22. The bug was introduced in 54c1a859efd9f ("ipv6: Don't drop cache route entry unless timer actually expired.") where the expired cached route is deleted and the sk_dst_cache member of the socket is set to NULL by calling dst_negative_advice() but the refcount belonging to the socket is left unbalanced. The IPv4 version - ipv4_negative_advice() - is not affected by this bug. When the TCP connection times out ipv4_negative_advice() merely resets the sk_dst_cache of the socket while decrementing the refcount of the exception dst.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/ipv6: release expired exception dst cached in socket Dst objects get leaked in ip6_negative_advice() when this function is executed for an expired IPv6 route located in the exception table. There are several conditions that must be fulfilled for the leak to occur: * an ICMPv6 packet indicating a change of the MTU for the path is received, resulting in an exception dst being created * a TCP connection that uses the exception dst for routing packets must start timing out so that TCP begins retransmissions * after the exception dst expires, the FIB6 garbage collector must not run before TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for the expired exception dst When TCP executes ip6_negative_advice() for an exception dst that has expired and if no other socket holds a reference to the exception dst, the refcount of the exception dst is 2, which corresponds to the increment made by dst_init() and the increment made by the TCP socket for which the connection is timing out. The refcount made by the socket is never released. The refcount of the dst is decremented in sk_dst_reset() but that decrement is counteracted by a dst_hold() intentionally placed just before the sk_dst_reset() in ip6_negative_advice(). After ip6_negative_advice() has finished, there is no other object tied to the dst. The socket lost its reference stored in sk_dst_cache and the dst is no longer in the exception table. The exception dst becomes a leaked object. As a result of this dst leak, an unbalanced refcount is reported for the loopback device of a net namespace being destroyed under kernels that do not contain e5f80fcf869a ("ipv6: give an IPv6 dev to blackhole_netdev"): unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 2 Fix the dst leak by removing the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice(). The patch that introduced the dst_hold() in ip6_negative_advice() was 92f1655aa2b22 ("net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race"). But 92f1655aa2b22 merely refactored the code with regards to the dst refcount so the issue was present even before 92f1655aa2b22. The bug was introduced in 54c1a859efd9f ("ipv6: Don't drop cache route entry unless timer actually expired.") where the expired cached route is deleted and the sk_dst_cache member of the socket is set to NULL by calling dst_negative_advice() but the refcount belonging to the socket is left unbalanced. The IPv4 version - ipv4_negative_advice() - is not affected by this bug. When the TCP connection times out ipv4_negative_advice() merely resets the sk_dst_cache of the socket while decrementing the refcount of the exception dst.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2043IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Denial of Service Zustand zu erzeugen, um Dateien zu manipulieren und um nicht nächer spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3762Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher beschriebene Effekte zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250101Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025, published on 1 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0789Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

entation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7244264 du 08 septembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7244264 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7244494 du 10 septembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7244494 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7244786 du 12 septembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7244786 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-49083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083 Référence CVE CVE-2024-12797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-6119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-26791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26791 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2024-56623 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56630 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0308Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56646 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56623 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-56630 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028474Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.34, 5.4.287 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.231 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.174 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.120 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.66 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.5 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Dec 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53292
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-56644 · cve.blacktree.nl