BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-56592High confidence

bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

19 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-53240

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket() For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However, bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock (raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock (spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted ----------------------------- test_maps/4881 is trying to lock: ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by test_maps/4881: #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270 #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0 lock_acquire+0x182/0x450 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70 bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110 bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0 free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380 __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60 x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is still a spinlock. Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion. Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map. There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr: (1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(), because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems. It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old element as well. (2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(), htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(). For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these elements have been removed from the hash llist. Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation, __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept it as ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket() For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However, bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock (raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock (spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted ----------------------------- test_maps/4881 is trying to lock: ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by test_maps/4881: #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270 #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0 lock_acquire+0x182/0x450 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70 bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110 bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0 free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380 __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60 x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is still a spinlock. Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion. Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map. There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr: (1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(), because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems. It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old element as well. (2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(), htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(). For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these elements have been removed from the hash llist. Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation, __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept it as ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket() For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However, bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock (raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock (spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted ----------------------------- test_maps/4881 is trying to lock: ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by test_maps/4881: #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270 #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0 lock_acquire+0x182/0x450 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70 bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110 bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0 free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380 __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60 x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is still a spinlock. Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion. Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map. There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr: (1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(), because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems. It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old element as well. (2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(), htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(). For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these elements have been removed from the hash llist. Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation, __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept it as ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-3762Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht näher beschriebene Effekte zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-56433 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-56433 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56557 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56607 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0899Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

CVE-2022-48816 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-40966 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-40989 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-56641 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-49844 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61984 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61985 du 08 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-53195 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-53196 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-53234 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-56592 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39955 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-39957 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-46817 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-46818 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-46819 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-8291 du 10 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-41079 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-42321 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2024-46717 du 11 octobre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-11412

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56581 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56581 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-56582 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56579 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56574 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-5660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-56574 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56589 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56592 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
f3f1c054c288bb6e503005e6d73611151ed20e91 < 10e8a2dec9ff1b81de8e892b0850924038adbc6d; f3f1c054c288bb6e503005e6d73611151ed20e91 < a50b4aa3007e63a590d501341f304676ebc74b3b; f3f1c054c288bb6e503005e6d73611151ed20e91 < b9e9ed90b10c82a4e9d4d70a2890f06bfcdd3b78; 4.13
Fixed
< 4.13; 6.6.66 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.5 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Dec 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:55 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-53240
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-56592 · cve.blacktree.nl