BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-53190High confidence

wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read efuse in case of failures

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.123-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-53190 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 67 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2024-53190
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read efuse in case of failures Syzkaller reported a hung task with uevent_show() on stack trace. That specific issue was addressed by another commit [0], but even with that fix applied (for example, running v6.12-rc5) we face another type of hung task that comes from the same reproducer [1]. By investigating that, we could narrow it to the following path: (a) Syzkaller emulates a Realtek USB WiFi adapter using raw-gadget and dummy_hcd infrastructure. (b) During the probe of rtl8192cu, the driver ends-up performing an efuse read procedure (which is related to EEPROM load IIUC), and here lies the issue: the function read_efuse() calls read_efuse_byte() many times, as loop iterations depending on the efuse size (in our example, 512 in total). This procedure for reading efuse bytes relies in a loop that performs an I/O read up to *10k* times in case of failures. We measured the time of the loop inside read_efuse_byte() alone, and in this reproducer (which involves the dummy_hcd emulation layer), it takes 15 seconds each. As a consequence, we have the driver stuck in its probe routine for big time, exposing a stack trace like below if we attempt to reboot the system, for example: task:kworker/0:3 state:D stack:0 pid:662 tgid:662 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Call Trace: __schedule+0xe22/0xeb6 schedule_timeout+0xe7/0x132 __wait_for_common+0xb5/0x12e usb_start_wait_urb+0xc5/0x1ef ? usb_alloc_urb+0x95/0xa4 usb_control_msg+0xff/0x184 _usbctrl_vendorreq_sync+0xa0/0x161 _usb_read_sync+0xb3/0xc5 read_efuse_byte+0x13c/0x146 read_efuse+0x351/0x5f0 efuse_read_all_map+0x42/0x52 rtl_efuse_shadow_map_update+0x60/0xef rtl_get_hwinfo+0x5d/0x1c2 rtl92cu_read_eeprom_info+0x10a/0x8d5 ? rtl92c_read_chip_version+0x14f/0x17e rtl_usb_probe+0x323/0x851 usb_probe_interface+0x278/0x34b really_probe+0x202/0x4a4 __driver_probe_device+0x166/0x1b2 driver_probe_device+0x2f/0xd8 [...] We propose hereby to drastically reduce the attempts of doing the I/O reads in case of failures, restricted to USB devices (given that they're inherently slower than PCIe ones). By retrying up to 10 times (instead of 10000), we got reponsiveness in the reproducer, while seems reasonable to believe that there's no sane USB device implementation in the field requiring this amount of retries at every I/O read in order to properly work. Based on that assumption, it'd be good to have it backported to stable but maybe not since driver implementation (the 10k number comes from day 0), perhaps up to 6.x series makes sense. [0] Commit 15fffc6a5624 ("driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race") [1] A note about that: this syzkaller report presents multiple reproducers that differs by the type of emulated USB device. For this specific case, check the entry from 2024/08/08 06:23 in the list of crashes; the C repro is available at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=1521fc83980000.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-51862

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read efuse in case of failures Syzkaller reported a hung task with uevent_show() on stack trace. That specific issue was addressed by another commit [0], but even with that fix applied (for example, running v6.12-rc5) we face another type of hung task that comes from the same reproducer [1]. By investigating that, we could narrow it to the following path: (a) Syzkaller emulates a Realtek USB WiFi adapter using raw-gadget and dummy_hcd infrastructure. (b) During the probe of rtl8192cu, the driver ends-up performing an efuse read procedure (which is related to EEPROM load IIUC), and here lies the issue: the function read_efuse() calls read_efuse_byte() many times, as loop iterations depending on the efuse size (in our example, 512 in total). This procedure for reading efuse bytes relies in a loop that performs an I/O read up to *10k* times in case of failures. We measured the time of the loop inside read_efuse_byte() alone, and in this reproducer (which involves the dummy_hcd emulation layer), it takes 15 seconds each. As a consequence, we have the driver stuck in its probe routine for big time, exposing a stack trace like below if we attempt to reboot the system, for example: task:kworker/0:3 state:D stack:0 pid:662 tgid:662 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Call Trace: __schedule+0xe22/0xeb6 schedule_timeout+0xe7/0x132 __wait_for_common+0xb5/0x12e usb_start_wait_urb+0xc5/0x1ef ? usb_alloc_urb+0x95/0xa4 usb_control_msg+0xff/0x184 _usbctrl_vendorreq_sync+0xa0/0x161 _usb_read_sync+0xb3/0xc5 read_efuse_byte+0x13c/0x146 read_efuse+0x351/0x5f0 efuse_read_all_map+0x42/0x52 rtl_efuse_shadow_map_update+0x60/0xef rtl_get_hwinfo+0x5d/0x1c2 rtl92cu_read_eeprom_info+0x10a/0x8d5 ? rtl92c_read_chip_version+0x14f/0x17e rtl_usb_probe+0x323/0x851 usb_probe_interface+0x278/0x34b really_probe+0x202/0x4a4 __driver_probe_device+0x166/0x1b2 driver_probe_device+0x2f/0xd8 [...] We propose hereby to drastically reduce the attempts of doing the I/O reads in case of failures, restricted to USB devices (given that they're inherently slower than PCIe ones). By retrying up to 10 times (instead of 10000), we got reponsiveness in the reproducer, while seems reasonable to believe that there's no sane USB device implementation in the field requiring this amount of retries at every I/O read in order to properly work. Based on that assumption, it'd be good to have it backported to stable but maybe not since driver implementation (the 10k number comes from day 0), perhaps up to 6.x series makes sense. [0] Commit 15fffc6a5624 ("driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race") [1] A note about that: this syzkaller report presents multiple reproducers that differs by the type of emulated USB device. For this specific case, check the entry from 2024/08/08 06:23 in the list of crashes; the C repro is available at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=1521fc83980000.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read efuse in case of failures Syzkaller reported a hung task with uevent_show() on stack trace. That specific issue was addressed by another commit [0], but even with that fix applied (for example, running v6.12-rc5) we face another type of hung task that comes from the same reproducer [1]. By investigating that, we could narrow it to the following path: (a) Syzkaller emulates a Realtek USB WiFi adapter using raw-gadget and dummy_hcd infrastructure. (b) During the probe of rtl8192cu, the driver ends-up performing an efuse read procedure (which is related to EEPROM load IIUC), and here lies the issue: the function read_efuse() calls read_efuse_byte() many times, as loop iterations depending on the efuse size (in our example, 512 in total). This procedure for reading efuse bytes relies in a loop that performs an I/O read up to *10k* times in case of failures. We measured the time of the loop inside read_efuse_byte() alone, and in this reproducer (which involves the dummy_hcd emulation layer), it takes 15 seconds each. As a consequence, we have the driver stuck in its probe routine for big time, exposing a stack trace like below if we attempt to reboot the system, for example: task:kworker/0:3 state:D stack:0 pid:662 tgid:662 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Call Trace: __schedule+0xe22/0xeb6 schedule_timeout+0xe7/0x132 __wait_for_common+0xb5/0x12e usb_start_wait_urb+0xc5/0x1ef ? usb_alloc_urb+0x95/0xa4 usb_control_msg+0xff/0x184 _usbctrl_vendorreq_sync+0xa0/0x161 _usb_read_sync+0xb3/0xc5 read_efuse_byte+0x13c/0x146 read_efuse+0x351/0x5f0 efuse_read_all_map+0x42/0x52 rtl_efuse_shadow_map_update+0x60/0xef rtl_get_hwinfo+0x5d/0x1c2 rtl92cu_read_eeprom_info+0x10a/0x8d5 ? rtl92c_read_chip_version+0x14f/0x17e rtl_usb_probe+0x323/0x851 usb_probe_interface+0x278/0x34b really_probe+0x202/0x4a4 __driver_probe_device+0x166/0x1b2 driver_probe_device+0x2f/0xd8 [...] We propose hereby to drastically reduce the attempts of doing the I/O reads in case of failures, restricted to USB devices (given that they're inherently slower than PCIe ones). By retrying up to 10 times (instead of 10000), we got reponsiveness in the reproducer, while seems reasonable to believe that there's no sane USB device implementation in the field requiring this amount of retries at every I/O read in order to properly work. Based on that assumption, it'd be good to have it backported to stable but maybe not since driver implementation (the 10k number comes from day 0), perhaps up to 6.x series makes sense. [0] Commit 15fffc6a5624 ("driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race") [1] A note about that: this syzkaller report presents multiple reproducers that differs by the type of emulated USB device. For this specific case, check the entry from 2024/08/08 06:23 in the list of crashes; the C repro is available at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=1521fc83980000.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read efuse in case of failures Syzkaller reported a hung task with uevent_show() on stack trace. That specific issue was addressed by another commit [0], but even with that fix applied (for example, running v6.12-rc5) we face another type of hung task that comes from the same reproducer [1]. By investigating that, we could narrow it to the following path: (a) Syzkaller emulates a Realtek USB WiFi adapter using raw-gadget and dummy_hcd infrastructure. (b) During the probe of rtl8192cu, the driver ends-up performing an efuse read procedure (which is related to EEPROM load IIUC), and here lies the issue: the function read_efuse() calls read_efuse_byte() many times, as loop iterations depending on the efuse size (in our example, 512 in total). This procedure for reading efuse bytes relies in a loop that performs an I/O read up to *10k* times in case of failures. We measured the time of the loop inside read_efuse_byte() alone, and in this reproducer (which involves the dummy_hcd emulation layer), it takes 15 seconds each. As a consequence, we have the driver stuck in its probe routine for big time, exposing a stack trace like below if we attempt to reboot the system, for example: task:kworker/0:3 state:D stack:0 pid:662 tgid:662 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event Call Trace: __schedule+0xe22/0xeb6 schedule_timeout+0xe7/0x132 __wait_for_common+0xb5/0x12e usb_start_wait_urb+0xc5/0x1ef ? usb_alloc_urb+0x95/0xa4 usb_control_msg+0xff/0x184 _usbctrl_vendorreq_sync+0xa0/0x161 _usb_read_sync+0xb3/0xc5 read_efuse_byte+0x13c/0x146 read_efuse+0x351/0x5f0 efuse_read_all_map+0x42/0x52 rtl_efuse_shadow_map_update+0x60/0xef rtl_get_hwinfo+0x5d/0x1c2 rtl92cu_read_eeprom_info+0x10a/0x8d5 ? rtl92c_read_chip_version+0x14f/0x17e rtl_usb_probe+0x323/0x851 usb_probe_interface+0x278/0x34b really_probe+0x202/0x4a4 __driver_probe_device+0x166/0x1b2 driver_probe_device+0x2f/0xd8 [...] We propose hereby to drastically reduce the attempts of doing the I/O reads in case of failures, restricted to USB devices (given that they're inherently slower than PCIe ones). By retrying up to 10 times (instead of 10000), we got reponsiveness in the reproducer, while seems reasonable to believe that there's no sane USB device implementation in the field requiring this amount of retries at every I/O read in order to properly work. Based on that assumption, it'd be good to have it backported to stable but maybe not since driver implementation (the 10k number comes from day 0), perhaps up to 6.x series makes sense. [0] Commit 15fffc6a5624 ("driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race") [1] A note about that: this syzkaller report presents multiple reproducers that differs by the type of emulated USB device. For this specific case, check the entry from 2024/08/08 06:23 in the list of crashes; the C repro is available at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=1521fc83980000.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250101Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025, published on 1 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53189 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53193 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-028100Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.38, 6.1.120 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.64 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.11 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12.2 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Dec 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 20:52 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-51862
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-53190 · cve.blacktree.nl