BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-53166High confidence

block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth()

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-082556 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.133-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth() Set new allocated bfqq to bic or remove freed bfqq from bic are both protected by bfqd->lock, however bfq_limit_depth() is deferencing bfqq from bic without the lock, this can lead to UAF if the io_context is shared by multiple tasks. For example, test bfq with io_uring can trigger following UAF in v6.6: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x66/0x300 print_report+0x3e/0x70 kasan_report+0xb4/0xf0 bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 bfqq_request_over_limit+0x130/0x9a0 bfq_limit_depth+0x1b5/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x2b5/0xa00 blk_mq_get_new_requests+0x11d/0x1d0 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x286/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __block_write_full_folio+0x3d0/0x640 writepage_cb+0x3b/0xc0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 do_writepages+0x192/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Allocated by task 808602: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x83/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b1/0x6d0 bfq_get_queue+0x138/0xfa0 bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split+0xe3/0x2c0 bfq_init_rq+0x196/0xbb0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0xb5/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_insert_request+0x15d/0x440 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a4/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __blkdev_direct_IO_async+0x2dd/0x330 blkdev_write_iter+0x39a/0x450 io_write+0x22a/0x840 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Freed by task 808589: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40 __kasan_slab_free+0x126/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0x10c/0x750 bfq_put_queue+0x2dd/0x770 __bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x155/0x7a0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x122/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list+0x528/0x7e0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0xe5/0x590 __blk_flush_plug+0x3b/0x90 blk_finish_plug+0x40/0x60 do_writepages+0x19d/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fix the problem by protecting bic_to_bfqq() with bfqd->lock.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-51838

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 24 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth() Set new allocated bfqq to bic or remove freed bfqq from bic are both protected by bfqd->lock, however bfq_limit_depth() is deferencing bfqq from bic without the lock, this can lead to UAF if the io_context is shared by multiple tasks. For example, test bfq with io_uring can trigger following UAF in v6.6: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x66/0x300 print_report+0x3e/0x70 kasan_report+0xb4/0xf0 bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 bfqq_request_over_limit+0x130/0x9a0 bfq_limit_depth+0x1b5/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x2b5/0xa00 blk_mq_get_new_requests+0x11d/0x1d0 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x286/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __block_write_full_folio+0x3d0/0x640 writepage_cb+0x3b/0xc0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 do_writepages+0x192/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 808602: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x83/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b1/0x6d0 bfq_get_queue+0x138/0xfa0 bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split+0xe3/0x2c0 bfq_init_rq+0x196/0xbb0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0xb5/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_insert_request+0x15d/0x440 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a4/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __blkdev_direct_IO_async+0x2dd/0x330 blkdev_write_iter+0x39a/0x450 io_write+0x22a/0x840 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Freed by task 808589: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40 __kasan_slab_free+0x126/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0x10c/0x750 bfq_put_queue+0x2dd/0x770 __bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x155/0x7a0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x122/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list+0x528/0x7e0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0xe5/0x590 __blk_flush_plug+0x3b/0x90 blk_finish_plug+0x40/0x60 do_writepages+0x19d/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fix the problem by protecting bic_to_bfqq() with bfqd->lock.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth() Set new allocated bfqq to bic or remove freed bfqq from bic are both protected by bfqd->lock, however bfq_limit_depth() is deferencing bfqq from bic without the lock, this can lead to UAF if the io_context is shared by multiple tasks. For example, test bfq with io_uring can trigger following UAF in v6.6: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x66/0x300 print_report+0x3e/0x70 kasan_report+0xb4/0xf0 bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 bfqq_request_over_limit+0x130/0x9a0 bfq_limit_depth+0x1b5/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x2b5/0xa00 blk_mq_get_new_requests+0x11d/0x1d0 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x286/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __block_write_full_folio+0x3d0/0x640 writepage_cb+0x3b/0xc0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 do_writepages+0x192/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 808602: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x83/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b1/0x6d0 bfq_get_queue+0x138/0xfa0 bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split+0xe3/0x2c0 bfq_init_rq+0x196/0xbb0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0xb5/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_insert_request+0x15d/0x440 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a4/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __blkdev_direct_IO_async+0x2dd/0x330 blkdev_write_iter+0x39a/0x450 io_write+0x22a/0x840 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Freed by task 808589: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40 __kasan_slab_free+0x126/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0x10c/0x750 bfq_put_queue+0x2dd/0x770 __bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x155/0x7a0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x122/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list+0x528/0x7e0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0xe5/0x590 __blk_flush_plug+0x3b/0x90 blk_finish_plug+0x40/0x60 do_writepages+0x19d/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fix the problem by protecting bic_to_bfqq() with bfqd->lock.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block, bfq: fix bfqq uaf in bfq_limit_depth() Set new allocated bfqq to bic or remove freed bfqq from bic are both protected by bfqd->lock, however bfq_limit_depth() is deferencing bfqq from bic without the lock, this can lead to UAF if the io_context is shared by multiple tasks. For example, test bfq with io_uring can trigger following UAF in v6.6: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x66/0x300 print_report+0x3e/0x70 kasan_report+0xb4/0xf0 bfqq_group+0x15/0x50 bfqq_request_over_limit+0x130/0x9a0 bfq_limit_depth+0x1b5/0x480 __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x2b5/0xa00 blk_mq_get_new_requests+0x11d/0x1d0 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x286/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __block_write_full_folio+0x3d0/0x640 writepage_cb+0x3b/0xc0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 write_cache_pages+0x254/0x6c0 do_writepages+0x192/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 808602: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x83/0x90 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b1/0x6d0 bfq_get_queue+0x138/0xfa0 bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split+0xe3/0x2c0 bfq_init_rq+0x196/0xbb0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0xb5/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_insert_request+0x15d/0x440 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x8a4/0xb00 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x331/0x400 __blkdev_direct_IO_async+0x2dd/0x330 blkdev_write_iter+0x39a/0x450 io_write+0x22a/0x840 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Freed by task 808589: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40 __kasan_slab_free+0x126/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0x10c/0x750 bfq_put_queue+0x2dd/0x770 __bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x155/0x7a0 bfq_insert_request.isra.0+0x122/0x480 bfq_insert_requests+0x156/0x180 blk_mq_dispatch_plug_list+0x528/0x7e0 blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0xe5/0x590 __blk_flush_plug+0x3b/0x90 blk_finish_plug+0x40/0x60 do_writepages+0x19d/0x310 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x95/0xc0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x99/0xd0 filemap_write_and_wait_range.part.0+0x4d/0xa0 blkdev_read_iter+0xef/0x1e0 io_read+0x1b6/0x8a0 io_issue_sqe+0x87/0x300 io_wq_submit_work+0xeb/0x390 io_worker_handle_work+0x24d/0x550 io_wq_worker+0x27f/0x6c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fix the problem by protecting bic_to_bfqq() with bfqd->lock.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2855IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DataPower Gateway ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere, nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250101Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 01 Jan 2025, published on 1 January 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0668Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-26643 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26809 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0624Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0492Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

1500 versions supérieures ou égales àV3.1.5 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-4527, CVE-2023-4806, CVE-2023-4911, CVE-2023-5363, CVE-2023-6246, CVE-2023-6779, CVE-2023-6780, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-38545, CVE-2023-38546, CVE-2023-44487, CVE-2023-46218, CVE-2023-46219, CVE-2023-48795, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-51385, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-2961, CVE-2024-6119, CVE-2024-6387, CVE-2024-12133, CVE-2024-12243, CVE-2024-24855, CVE-2024-26596, CVE-2024-28085, CVE-2024-33599, CVE-2024-33600, CVE-2024-33601, CVE-2024-33602, CVE-2024-34397, CVE-2024-37370, CVE-2024-37371, CVE-2024-45490, CVE-2024-45491, CVE-2024-45492, CVE-2024-50246, CVE-2024-53166, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57996, CVE-2024-58005, CVE-2025-4373, CVE-2025-4598, CVE-2025-21701, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21724, CVE-2025-21728, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21756, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21766, CVE-2025-21767, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21848, CVE-2025-21862, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21865, CVE-2025-26465, CVE-2025-31115 et CVE-2025-46836. Résumé De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distan

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-47754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56608 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56608 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57834 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0333Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-38611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40973 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40973 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46772 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47754 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-57977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58002 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58005 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53172 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53154 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-016872Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0187Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Manipulatie van gegevens - Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (root/admin rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - Toegang tot systeemgegevens - Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens - Spoofing De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.17, 6.1.130 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.64 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.11 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12.2 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.13 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 27 Dec 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-51838
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-53166 · cve.blacktree.nl