BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-53140High confidence

netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 222 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 222 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.119-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-53140 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close
198 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Netlink subsystem. When an application terminates a Netlink socket while an asynchronous data dump operation is in progress, the socket cleanup routines are handled incorrectly. A local user can exploit this issue by closing a socket during an active dump, causing cleanup functions to execute in an atomic context where sleeping is not permitted. This flaw leads to a system crash, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close Netlink supports iterative dumping of data. It provides the families the following ops: - start - (optional) kicks off the dumping process - dump - actual dump helper, keeps getting called until it returns 0 - done - (optional) pairs with .start, can be used for cleanup The whole process is asynchronous and the repeated calls to .dump don't actually happen in a tight loop, but rather are triggered in response to recvmsg() on the socket. This gives the user full control over the dump, but also means that the user can close the socket without getting to the end of the dump. To make sure .start is always paired with .done we check if there is an ongoing dump before freeing the socket, and if so call .done. The complication is that sockets can get freed from BH and .done is allowed to sleep. So we use a workqueue to defer the call, when needed. Unfortunately this does not work correctly. What we defer is not the cleanup but rather releasing a reference on the socket. We have no guarantee that we own the last reference, if someone else holds the socket they may release it in BH and we're back to square one. The whole dance, however, appears to be unnecessary. Only the user can interact with dumps, so we can clean up when socket is closed. And close always happens in process context. Some async code may still access the socket after close, queue notification skbs to it etc. but no dumps can start, end or otherwise make progress. Delete the workqueue and flush the dump state directly from the release handler. Note that further cleanup is possible in -next, for instance we now always call .done before releasing the main module reference, so dump doesn't have to take a reference of its own.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-51812

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 222 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close Netlink supports iterative dumping of data. It provides the families the following ops: - start - (optional) kicks off the dumping process - dump - actual dump helper, keeps getting called until it returns 0 - done - (optional) pairs with .start, can be used for cleanup The whole process is asynchronous and the repeated calls to .dump don't actually happen in a tight loop, but rather are triggered in response to recvmsg() on the socket. This gives the user full control over the dump, but also means that the user can close the socket without getting to the end of the dump. To make sure .start is always paired with .done we check if there is an ongoing dump before freeing the socket, and if so call .done. The complication is that sockets can get freed from BH and .done is allowed to sleep. So we use a workqueue to defer the call, when needed. Unfortunately this does not work correctly. What we defer is not the cleanup but rather releasing a reference on the socket. We have no guarantee that we own the last reference, if someone else holds the socket they may release it in BH and we're back to square one. The whole dance, however, appears to be unnecessary. Only the user can interact with dumps, so we can clean up when socket is closed. And close always happens in process context. Some async code may still access the socket after close, queue notification skbs to it etc. but no dumps can start, end or otherwise make progress. Delete the workqueue and flush the dump state directly from the release handler. Note that further cleanup is possible in -next, for instance we now always call .done before releasing the main module reference, so dump doesn't have to take a reference of its own.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close Netlink supports iterative dumping of data. It provides the families the following ops: - start - (optional) kicks off the dumping process - dump - actual dump helper, keeps getting called until it returns 0 - done - (optional) pairs with .start, can be used for cleanup The whole process is asynchronous and the repeated calls to .dump don't actually happen in a tight loop, but rather are triggered in response to recvmsg() on the socket. This gives the user full control over the dump, but also means that the user can close the socket without getting to the end of the dump. To make sure .start is always paired with .done we check if there is an ongoing dump before freeing the socket, and if so call .done. The complication is that sockets can get freed from BH and .done is allowed to sleep. So we use a workqueue to defer the call, when needed. Unfortunately this does not work correctly. What we defer is not the cleanup but rather releasing a reference on the socket. We have no guarantee that we own the last reference, if someone else holds the socket they may release it in BH and we're back to square one. The whole dance, however, appears to be unnecessary. Only the user can interact with dumps, so we can clean up when socket is closed. And close always happens in process context. Some async code may still access the socket after close, queue notification skbs to it etc. but no dumps can start, end or otherwise make progress. Delete the workqueue and flush the dump state directly from the release handler. Note that further cleanup is possible in -next, for instance we now always call .done before releasing the main module reference, so dump doesn't have to take a reference of its own.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: terminate outstanding dump on socket close Netlink supports iterative dumping of data. It provides the families the following ops: - start - (optional) kicks off the dumping process - dump - actual dump helper, keeps getting called until it returns 0 - done - (optional) pairs with .start, can be used for cleanup The whole process is asynchronous and the repeated calls to .dump don't actually happen in a tight loop, but rather are triggered in response to recvmsg() on the socket. This gives the user full control over the dump, but also means that the user can close the socket without getting to the end of the dump. To make sure .start is always paired with .done we check if there is an ongoing dump before freeing the socket, and if so call .done. The complication is that sockets can get freed from BH and .done is allowed to sleep. So we use a workqueue to defer the call, when needed. Unfortunately this does not work correctly. What we defer is not the cleanup but rather releasing a reference on the socket. We have no guarantee that we own the last reference, if someone else holds the socket they may release it in BH and we're back to square one. The whole dance, however, appears to be unnecessary. Only the user can interact with dumps, so we can clean up when socket is closed. And close always happens in process context. Some async code may still access the socket after close, queue notification skbs to it etc. but no dumps can start, end or otherwise make progress. Delete the workqueue and flush the dump state directly from the release handler. Note that further cleanup is possible in -next, for instance we now always call .done before releasing the main module reference, so dump doesn't have to take a reference of its own.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3608Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241211Security Bulletin 11 Dec 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 11 Dec 2024, published on 11 December 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50162 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50223 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0387Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50248 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-41090 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0308Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0276Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0254Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-48881 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51729 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52319 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53681 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53682 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53685 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53690 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53690 Référence CVE CVE-2024-54191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0184Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53132 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53137 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53143 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2024-50267 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50274 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50275 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53047 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53677 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53677 Référence CVE CVE-2024-5569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201 Référence CVE CVE-2024-56326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326 Référence CVE CVE-2024-7348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7348 Gestion détaillée du document le 07 février 2025 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-8805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805 Gestion détaillée du document le 03 janvier 2025 Version initiale le 06 janvier 2025 Changement référence Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-014705Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.9, 4.19.325 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.287 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.231 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.174 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.119 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.63 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.11.10 ≤ 6.11.*, 6.12 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Dec 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-51812
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-53140 · cve.blacktree.nl