BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-53123High confidence

mptcp: error out earlier on disconnect

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.18% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

23 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 19 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.119-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.11.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2024-53123 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: mptcp: error out earlier on disconnect
22 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-rt as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-kvm as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-internal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • kernel-rt-debug-modules-partner as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's Multipath TCP (MPTCP) implementation. Due to improper handling of racing socket disconnect events, the kernel fails to handle error returns appropriately, leading to a division-by-zero error during TCP window calculations. A local attacker can exploit this issue to trigger a system crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS).
Remediation
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-51795

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 19 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: error out earlier on disconnect Eric reported a division by zero splat in the MPTCP protocol: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6094 Comm: syz-executor317 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00291-g05b92660cdfe #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x5b4/0x1310 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3163 Code: f6 44 01 e3 89 df e8 9b 75 09 f8 44 39 f3 0f 8d 11 ff ff ff e8 0d 74 09 f8 45 89 f4 e9 04 ff ff ff e8 00 74 09 f8 44 89 f0 99 <f7> 7c 24 14 41 29 d6 45 89 f4 e9 ec fe ff ff e8 e8 73 09 f8 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc900041f7930 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000017e67 RBX: 0000000000017e67 RCX: ffffffff8983314b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff898331b0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00000000005d6000 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000017e67 R10: 0000000000003e80 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000003e80 R13: ffff888031d9b440 R14: 0000000000017e67 R15: 00000000002eb000 FS: 00007feb5d7f16c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007feb5d8adbb8 CR3: 0000000074e4c000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x3e7/0x4b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1493 mptcp_rcv_space_adjust net/mptcp/protocol.c:2085 [inline] mptcp_recvmsg+0x2156/0x2600 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2289 inet_recvmsg+0x469/0x6a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:885 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1051 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x1b2/0x250 net/socket.c:1073 __sys_recvfrom+0x1a5/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2265 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2283 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2279 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe0/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2279 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7feb5d857559 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007feb5d7f1208 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007feb5d8e1318 RCX: 00007feb5d857559 RDX: 000000800000000e RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007feb5d8e1310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff81000000 R10: 0000000000000100 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007feb5d8e131c R13: 00007feb5d8ae074 R14: 000000800000000e R15: 00000000fffffdef and provided a nice reproducer. The root cause is the current bad handling of racing disconnect. After the blamed commit below, sk_wait_data() can return (with error) with the underlying socket disconnected and a zero rcv_mss. Catch the error and return without performing any additional operations on the current socket.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: error out earlier on disconnect Eric reported a division by zero splat in the MPTCP protocol: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6094 Comm: syz-executor317 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00291-g05b92660cdfe #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x5b4/0x1310 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3163 Code: f6 44 01 e3 89 df e8 9b 75 09 f8 44 39 f3 0f 8d 11 ff ff ff e8 0d 74 09 f8 45 89 f4 e9 04 ff ff ff e8 00 74 09 f8 44 89 f0 99 <f7> 7c 24 14 41 29 d6 45 89 f4 e9 ec fe ff ff e8 e8 73 09 f8 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc900041f7930 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000017e67 RBX: 0000000000017e67 RCX: ffffffff8983314b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff898331b0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00000000005d6000 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000017e67 R10: 0000000000003e80 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000003e80 R13: ffff888031d9b440 R14: 0000000000017e67 R15: 00000000002eb000 FS: 00007feb5d7f16c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007feb5d8adbb8 CR3: 0000000074e4c000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x3e7/0x4b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1493 mptcp_rcv_space_adjust net/mptcp/protocol.c:2085 [inline] mptcp_recvmsg+0x2156/0x2600 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2289 inet_recvmsg+0x469/0x6a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:885 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1051 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x1b2/0x250 net/socket.c:1073 __sys_recvfrom+0x1a5/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2265 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2283 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2279 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe0/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2279 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7feb5d857559 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007feb5d7f1208 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007feb5d8e1318 RCX: 00007feb5d857559 RDX: 000000800000000e RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007feb5d8e1310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff81000000 R10: 0000000000000100 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007feb5d8e131c R13: 00007feb5d8ae074 R14: 000000800000000e R15: 00000000fffffdef and provided a nice reproducer. The root cause is the current bad handling of racing disconnect. After the blamed commit below, sk_wait_data() can return (with error) with the underlying socket disconnected and a zero rcv_mss. Catch the error and return without performing any additional operations on the current socket.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: error out earlier on disconnect Eric reported a division by zero splat in the MPTCP protocol: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6094 Comm: syz-executor317 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-syzkaller-00291-g05b92660cdfe #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 RIP: 0010:__tcp_select_window+0x5b4/0x1310 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:3163 Code: f6 44 01 e3 89 df e8 9b 75 09 f8 44 39 f3 0f 8d 11 ff ff ff e8 0d 74 09 f8 45 89 f4 e9 04 ff ff ff e8 00 74 09 f8 44 89 f0 99 <f7> 7c 24 14 41 29 d6 45 89 f4 e9 ec fe ff ff e8 e8 73 09 f8 48 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc900041f7930 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000017e67 RBX: 0000000000017e67 RCX: ffffffff8983314b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff898331b0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00000000005d6000 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000017e67 R10: 0000000000003e80 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000003e80 R13: ffff888031d9b440 R14: 0000000000017e67 R15: 00000000002eb000 FS: 00007feb5d7f16c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b8700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007feb5d8adbb8 CR3: 0000000074e4c000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0x3e7/0x4b0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1493 mptcp_rcv_space_adjust net/mptcp/protocol.c:2085 [inline] mptcp_recvmsg+0x2156/0x2600 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2289 inet_recvmsg+0x469/0x6a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:885 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1051 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0x1b2/0x250 net/socket.c:1073 __sys_recvfrom+0x1a5/0x2e0 net/socket.c:2265 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2283 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:2279 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe0/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2279 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7feb5d857559 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 51 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007feb5d7f1208 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007feb5d8e1318 RCX: 00007feb5d857559 RDX: 000000800000000e RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007feb5d8e1310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff81000000 R10: 0000000000000100 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007feb5d8e131c R13: 00007feb5d8ae074 R14: 000000800000000e R15: 00000000fffffdef and provided a nice reproducer. The root cause is the current bad handling of racing disconnect. After the blamed commit below, sk_wait_data() can return (with error) with the underlying socket disconnected and a zero rcv_mss. Catch the error and return without performing any additional operations on the current socket.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3575Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241204Security Bulletin 04 Dec 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 04 Dec 2024, published on 4 December 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2024-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53109 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50294 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-53103 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0185Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0152Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2024-53114 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53116 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0151Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-50299 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304 Référence CVE CVE-2024-52332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0002Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2024-53104 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53106 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138 Référence CVE CVE-2024-53140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-014701Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Dec 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:55 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-51795
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-51795↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-53123 · cve.blacktree.nl